Literature DB >> 26008626

Current Protocols of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking: Visual, Refractive, and Tomographic Outcomes.

Rohit Shetty1, Natasha Kishore Pahuja1, Rudy M M A Nuijts2, Amrita Ajani1, Chaitra Jayadev1, Chetna Sharma1, Harsha Nagaraja3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the effect of different protocols of collagen cross-linking on visual, refractive, and tomographic parameters in patients with progressive keratoconus.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized interventional study.
METHODS: In this study, 138 eyes of 138 patients with progressive keratoconus underwent corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL). Following detailed preoperative examination, Group I underwent conventional cross-linking (36 patients, 3 mW/cm(2) for 30 min); Group II (36 patients, 9 mW/cm(2) for 10 min), Group III (33 patients, 18 mW/cm(2) for 5 min), and Group IV (33 patients, 30 mW/cm(2) for 3 min) underwent accelerated cross-linking. Changes in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), flat keratometry, steep keratometry, thinnest pachymetry, specular microscopy, and demarcation line were studied at 6 and 12 months.
RESULTS: Improvement in the mean CDVA and SE were statistically significant in all groups except Group IV (P = .15 at 6 months, P = .17 at 12 months), with Group III (P = .01 at 6 and 12 months) showing the best results. Flattening of steep and flat keratometry was significant in Groups I (P = .01) and II (P = .01) as compared to the other groups. There was no significant difference in the pachymetry or specular microscopy in any of the groups. Groups I and II demonstrated a good demarcation line when compared to other groups.
CONCLUSION: Conventional CXL (Group I) and accelerated CXL with irradiations of 9 mW/cm(2) (Group II) and 18 mW/cm(2) (Group III) showed better visual, refractive, and tomographic improvements at the end of 12 months.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26008626     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  49 in total

1.  The efficacy of standard versus accelerated epi-off corneal cross-linking protocols: a systematic review and sub-group analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Miraftab; Hassan Hashemi; Mohammad Abdollahi; Shekoufeh Nikfar; Soheila Asgari
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Effectiveness and safety of accelerated (9 mW/cm2) corneal collagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus: a 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Darren Shu Jeng Ting; Romeela Rana-Rahman; Yunzi Chen; Dugald Bell; Jean-Pierre Danjoux; Stephen J Morgan; Saurabh Ghosh; Oliver Baylis
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Systematic review and Meta-analysis comparing modified cross-linking and standard cross-linking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yi Liu; Ying-Nan Zhang; Ai-Peng Li; Jing Zhang; Qing-Feng Liang; Ying Jie; Zhi-Qiang Pan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Comparative study of long-term outcomes of accelerated and conventional collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  J J Males; D Viswanathan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Corneal crosslinking (CXL) with 18-mW/cm2 irradiance and 5.4-J/cm2 radiant exposure-early postoperative safety.

Authors:  Isaak Fischinger; Theo G Seiler; Karthiga Santhirasegaram; Moritz Pettenkofer; Chris P Lohmann; Daniel Zapp
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Accelerated versus standard corneal cross linking in the treatment of ectasia post refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty: a medium term randomized trial.

Authors:  Hany A Khairy; Moataz F Elsawy; Khaled Said-Ahmed; Marwa A Zaki; Sameh S Mandour
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Long-term database analysis of conventional and accelerated crosslinked keratoconic mid-European eyes.

Authors:  Efstathios Vounotrypidis; Alexis Athanasiou; Karsten Kortüm; Daniel Kook; Mehdi Shajari; Siegfried Priglinger; Wolfgang J Mayer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  [Treatment indications for corneal crosslinking and clinical results of new corneal crosslinking techniques].

Authors:  Klara Borgardts; Johannes Menzel-Severing; Gerd Geerling; Theo G Seiler
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Accelerated versus Standard Corneal Cross-linking for Progressive Keratoconus in Syria.

Authors:  Abdelrahman M Salman; Taym R Darwish; Yusra H Haddad; Rafea H Shabaan; Mohammad Z Askar
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2021-07-29

10.  Accelerated, Pulsed Collagen Cross-Linking versus the Dresden Protocol in Keratoconus: A Case Series.

Authors:  Nikolaos Dervenis; Panagiotis Dervenis; Nikolaos Dragoumis; Andreas Papandroudis; Zachos Zachariadis; Miltos Balidis
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 1.927

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.