| Literature DB >> 29666402 |
Takashi Fukuyama1, Nobue Futawatari2, Rui Yamamura3, Taiga Yamazaki3, Yoshinobu Ichiki4, Akira Ema5, Hideki Ushiku5,6, Yatsushi Nishi6, Yoshihito Takahashi5,6, Toshikazu Otsuka7, Hitoshi Yamazaki8, Wasaburo Koizumi9, Kosei Yasumoto10, Noritada Kobayashi3.
Abstract
Kita-Kyushu lung cancer antigen-1 (KK-LC-1) is a cancer/testis antigen (CTA) and predominant target for cancer immunotherapy. Our previous study indicated that KK-LC-1 was expressed in 82% of gastric cancers, and also in 79% of early stage of gastric cancers, with a correlation to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. In addition, we found that KK-LC-1 was occasionally expressed at non-tumour sites of stomachs carrying tumours. Here, we investigated the characteristics of KK-LC-1 expression at non-tumour sites and the clinical utility of these phenomena. The gene expression of KK-LC-1 was detected at the non-tumour sites including pyloric glands. The most detectable corpus/gland subset had a KK-LC-1 expression rate of 77% in the pyloric gland of the lower corpus where H. pylori preferentially exists. KK-LC-1 expression rates were 67% or 32% with or without intestinal metaplasia, which also induced by H. pylori, respectively. Consequently, KK-LC-1 would be detected at the pre-cancerous condition of the stomach, and may be a useful marker to predict gastric cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29666402 PMCID: PMC5904109 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24514-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Expression of CTAs in tumour area of 82 specimens.
| CTA | Positive | Negative | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| KK-LC-1 | 66 | 16 | 80.5 |
| MAGE-A1 | 22 | 60 | 26.8 |
| MAGE-A3 | 34 | 48 | 41.5 |
| MAGE-A4 | 17 | 65 | 20.7 |
| SSX4 | 18 | 64 | 22.0 |
| NY-ESO-1 | 14 | 68 | 17.1 |
Figure 1Expression of CTAs in tumour and normal areas of each gastric cancer patient. Each gastric specimen carrying a tumour was sampled in one tumour area and one (a) or two (b) non-tumour areas that were distant from the tumour and random. Each specimen was evaluated for the expression of CTAs in a tumour area and non-tumour area(s). Open or closed squares indicate no expression or expression of the CTA in a tumour area. Double circles represent expression of the CTA in a non-tumour area (a) or one or both non-tumour areas (b).
Figure 2Expression of KK-LC-1 in normal areas evaluated in the corpus and gastric gland. Gastric specimens carrying a tumour were assessed for the expression of KK-LC-1 in two or four non-tumour areas. Each non-tumour area was distinguished as the upper (U), middle (M), or lower (L) corpus, and fundic (F), borderline (B), pyloric (P), or undistinguished (−) gastric glands.
Expression of KK-LC-1 in gastric corpus. *p < 0.01 by Fisher’s exact test.
Expression of KK-LC-1 in gastric gland. ND: not distinguishable. *p < 0.01 by Fisher’s exact test.
Expression of KK-LC-1 in gastric gland and corpus.
| corpus | The expression of KK-LC-1 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fundic gland (F) | Border line (B) | Pyloric gland (P) | All | |||||||||
| Positive | Negative | rate (%) | Positive | Negative | rate (%) | Positive | Negative | rate (%) | Positive | Negative | rate (%) | |
| Upper (U) | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 2 | 6 | 25.0 | 2 | 5 | 28.6 | 4 | 14 | 22.2 |
| Middle (M) | 0 | 10 | 0.0 | 6 | 9 | 40.0 | 7 | 15 | 31.8 | 13 | 34 | 27.7 |
| Lower (L) | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | 4 | 42.9 | 36 | 11 | 76.6* | 39 | 15 | 72.2 |
| All | 0 | 13 | 0.0 | 11 | 19 | 36.7 | 45 | 31 | 59.2 | 56 | 63 | 47.1 |
The significant difference of L/P subset was compared to whole specimens except those in L/P subset.
*p<0.01 by Fisher’s exact test.
Expression of KK-LC-1 with intestinal metaplasia in pyloric gland. IM, Intestinal metaplasia. *p < 0.01 by Fisher’s exact test.
Figure 3Haematoxylin and eosin staining to assess gastric glands. All non-tumour areas including the sampled area were subjected to haematoxylin and eosin staining. The adjacent sampled gland area was distinguished as the pyloric gland (P), fundic gland (F), or their combination (borderline; B). When both ends were all P or F glands, the sampled area was considered as P or F. When one end was observed as a combination of P and F glands, the sampled area was considered as B. If one end was P and the other was F, the sampled area was considered as B.