Literature DB >> 29665297

Esmolol acutely alters oxygen supply-demand balance in exercising muscles of healthy humans.

David N Proctor1,2, J Carter Luck2, Stephan R Maman2, Urs A Leuenberger2, Matthew D Muller2,3.   

Abstract

Beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists (β blockers) reduce systemic O2 delivery and blood pressure (BP) during exercise, but the subsequent effects on O2 extraction within the active limb muscles are unknown. In this study, we examined the effects of the fast-acting, β1 selective blocker esmolol on systemic hemodynamics and leg muscle O2 saturation (near infrared spectroscopy, NIRS) during submaximal leg ergometry. Our main hypothesis was that esmolol would augment exercise-induced reductions in leg muscle O2 saturation. Eight healthy adults (6 men, 2 women; 23-67 year) performed light and moderate intensity bouts of recumbent leg cycling before (PRE), during (β1 -blocked), and 45 min following (POST) intravenous infusion of esmolol. Oxygen uptake, heart rate (HR), BP, and O2 saturation (SmO2 ) of the vastus lateralis (VL) and medial gastrocnemius (MG) muscles were measured continuously. Esmolol attenuated the increases in HR and systolic BP during light (-12 ± 9 bpm and -26 ± 12 mmHg vs. PRE) and moderate intensity (-20 ± 10 bpm and -40 ± 18 mmHg vs. PRE) cycling (all P < 0.01). Exercise-induced reductions in SmO2 occurred to a greater extent during the β1 -blockade trial in both the VL (P = 0.001 vs. PRE) and MG muscles (P = 0.022 vs. PRE). HR, SBP and SmO2 were restored during POST (all P < 0.01 vs. β1 -blocked). In conclusion, esmolol rapidly and reversibly increases O2 extraction within exercising muscles of healthy humans.
© 2018 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beta-adrenergic blockade; blood pressure; heart rate; near-infrared spectroscopy; oxygen uptake

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29665297      PMCID: PMC5903697          DOI: 10.14814/phy2.13673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Rep        ISSN: 2051-817X


Introduction

Beta‐adrenoreceptor antagonist drugs (β blockers) are the standard of care for patients with cardiac diseases such as previous myocardial infarction, stable angina, and heart failure (Freemantle et al. 1999; Frishman 2013; de Shu et al. 2012). Beta blockers reduce myocardial oxygen demand by reducing HR (Wellstein et al. 1987) and contractility (Weidemann et al. 2002). However, these cardiac effects can also reduce the exercise tolerance in people taking these medications due to limitations in systemic O2 delivery (via an impaired ability to raise heart rate and cardiac output) and active muscle blood flow (via a reduction in local perfusion pressure and/or augmented sympathetic vasoconstriction) (Hughson and Kowalchuk 1991; Pawelczyk et al. 1992; Tesch 1985). These hemodynamic effects are particularly evident during whole body exercise when compensatory increases in stroke volume are insufficient to preserve cardiac output and when sympathetic outflow increases to active skeletal muscles (Gullestad et al. 1996; Hughson and Kowalchuk 1991; MacFarlane et al. 1983; Tesch 1985). For people taking β blockers and performing activities of daily living (e.g. walking, climbing stairs, yard/house work), further widening of the arteriovenous O2 difference becomes an important compensatory mechanism for meeting O2 demand in peripheral tissues (Hughson and Kowalchuk 1991). Compensatory widening of the systemic arterial‐venous O2 difference in response to acute β blockade in exercising humans has been recognized since the 1960s (Epstein et al. 1965; Hamer and Sowton 1965). This response is thought to reflect, in large part, augmented extraction of O2 within the active muscle groups secondary to a reduction in muscle blood flow and O2 delivery (Hughson and Kowalchuk 1991; Tesch 1985). To the best of our knowledge only two studies have measured active limb venous O2 content/O2 extraction during large muscle mass exercise in β‐blocked humans (Pawelczyk et al. 1992; Pirnay et al. 1972); both studies reported lower venous O2 content in the femoral vein of healthy adults following systemic β 1 blockade, during submaximal cycling (Pawelczyk et al. 1992) and maximal treadmill (Pirnay et al. 1972) exercise. Pawelczyk and colleagues further showed that β 1 blockade reduced whole leg blood flow and O2 delivery and that the augmented O2 extraction across the exercising legs served to maintain leg O2 uptake. These findings suggest that β 1 blockade does indeed affect O2 delivery and O2 extraction (in a reciprocal manner) within the active limbs of β‐blocked humans. While direct, these whole limb measures of O2 extraction/venous O2 content do not indicate specifically where these β 1‐induced alterations in limb O2 supply‐demand are taking place (i.e., active vs. less active tissues), nor do they provide insight into the dynamic nature (onset, maintenance, reversibility, exercise intensity dependence) of these responses. Insight into these questions would advance our understanding of the local compensatory effects of these widely used drugs. In this study, we addressed these gaps in knowledge using esmolol, a fast‐acting β 1 selective blocker, in combination with the high temporal resolution of near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Specifically, we investigated the effects of esmolol on deoxygenation in two leg muscles (vastus lateralis, VL; medial gastrocnemius, MG) and systemic O2 uptake and hemodynamics during light and moderately intense cycle exercise in healthy adults. Esmolol hydrochloride (Brevibloc, Baxter Healthcare) is commonly used in clinical practice, with an elimination half‐life of <10 min due to metabolism by red blood cell esterases (Harless et al. 2015; Sum et al. 1983). We recently established that infusion of ~160 mg of esmolol (range 110–200 mg in the 5 min before exercise) acutely and selectively blocks β 1 receptors (Muller et al. 2017). The rapid half‐life of esmolol permitted us to assess SmO2 in the presence and subsequent absence of esmolol in a single visit, while keeping the NIRS probes in a constant location. We intentionally studied acute responses in healthy adults who were normally active to avoid the potentially confounding effects of chronic disease and β‐blocker use (Eynon et al. 2008), as well as aerobic exercise training (Proctor et al. 2001), on exercising muscle O2 extraction. In this way the intrinsic responses of exercising human muscle to an acute reduction in systemic O2 supply could be elucidated. We hypothesized that esmolol would attenuate exercise‐induced increases in HR and BP and evoke a rapid augmentation of O2 extraction in the active muscles of healthy humans, and that these effects would be quickly reversed due to the short half‐life of this drug.

Methods

Subjects and study design

Subjects in this study were part of a larger investigation examining the HR lowering effects of esmolol versus propranolol (Muller et al. 2017) and included healthy men and women who had undergone clinical screening tests (medical history, physical exam, and blood draw) and a graded treadmill test to maximal exertion prior to participating in the present protocol. Subjects who screened into this study ranged from 23 to 67 years of age, were nonsmokers, nonobese, and not taking any medications. Exclusion criteria included: pregnant and nursing women, individuals with a resting HR <45 beats/min, fat free mass (FFM) >100 kg, a history of cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, or endocrine disease. Physical characteristics are provided in Table 1.
Table 1

Subject characteristics

Variable
Sample, male/female6/2
Age, years40 (23–68)
Height, m1.77 (1.55–1.93)
Weight, kg79.9 (58.2–101.9)
Body mass index25.1 (22.4–30.0)
Body fat, %19.5 (10.5–28.2)
Fat‐free mass, kg64.1 (45.0–81.3)
Peak VO2, mL/kg per min43.2 (27.5–55.6)
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg113 (104–130)
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg69 (61–83)
Mean arterial pressure, mmHg83 (75–91)
Heart rate, beats/min60 (44–76)
Hemoglobin, g/dl13.9 (12.7–15.6)
Hematocrit, %40.1 (37.5–44.3)
Adipose tissue thickness, mm
Vastus lateralis6.15 (3.54–9.23)
Medial gastrocnemius4.15 (2.99–6.29)

Values are means with min‐max values in parentheses.

Subject characteristics Values are means with min‐max values in parentheses. These laboratory experiments used a repeated‐measures design where each participant served as his/her own control. Participants performed exercise bouts before (PRE), during (β 1‐blocked), and 45 min following (POST) intravenous infusion of esmolol hydrochloride (Brevibloc, Baxter Healthcare). This “Off‐On‐Off” paradigm was facilitated by the rapid onset (<2 min) and short half‐life (<10 min) of esmolol. All drug doses were calculated using FFM determined by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DEXA). The two women in this study were both premenopausal. All protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Penn State University College of Medicine, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Each subject voluntarily gave their written, informed consent prior to participation in this study.

Protocol and methods

These experiments were conducted in a thermoneutral (20–22°C) Clinical Research Center laboratory after subjects fasted ≥4 h. Subjects were instructed to refrain from exercise, caffeine, and alcohol for a minimum of 24 h before the experimental visit. BP was measured in triplicate using an automated oscillometric cuff (vital signs monitor SureSigns VS3, Philips) following a ten to fifteen minute rest period in the supine posture. Subjects were transitioned to the semi‐recumbent position on a cycle ergometer (Nautilus NR 2000; Fig. 1) and were instrumented with a three‐lead electrocardiogram (Cardiocap/5, GE Healthcare) and noninvasive brachial BP measured by an automated auscultatory cuff (SunTech Tango). A finger BP cuff (Finometer, Finapres Medical Systems) was attached for beat‐to‐beat analysis. A 22 g intravenous catheter was placed in the deep antecubital fossa of each subject's left arm. Two arm tables were raised to heart level and supported both arms to reduce motion artifact and optimize comfort. Pulmonary gas exchange was measured using an automated metabolic gas analyzer (ParvoMedics). Oxygen pulse, an index of stroke volume, was calculated as systemic O2 consumption expressed in mL/min divided by HR expressed in beats/min (Crisafulli et al. 2007). Two continuous wave NIRS devices (Moxy, Fortiori Design LLC) were attached to the right calf and right thigh at the region of the medial gastrocnemius and vastus lateralis muscles, respectively. The NIRS provides a measure of microvascular muscle oxygen saturation (SmO2) where SmO2 is the ratio of oxygenated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin expressed as a percentage. The NIRS technique has been extensively reviewed (Ferrari et al. 2011; Grassi and Quaresima 2016; Hamaoka et al. 2011; Jones et al. 2016) and previously described by our lab (Luck et al. 2017). Briefly, the NIRS device used in this study utilizes a four layer (epidermis, dermis, adipose, and muscle) Monte Carlo simulated model to trace the propagation of photons through a tissue medium. Wavelengths of 680, 720, 760, and 800 nm with a source‐detector separation of 12.5 and 25 mm were used. The NIRS signal penetration depth (~12.5 mm) was approximately half of the source‐detector separation distance. Penetrating light absorbed primarily by oxygenated hemoglobin, deoxygenated hemoglobin, and myoglobin was detected using the NIRS optical absorbance spectrum. The absorption spectrum of Mb is reported to overlap with Hb and therefore both molecules contributed to changes in the NIRS signal (Grassi and Quaresima 2016). Adipose tissue thicknesses (ATT) were obtained using ultrasound imaging (iE33, Philips) at each NIRS probe site to ensure proper signal penetration depth. In 2D mode, an average of three manually selected distances were measured from the epidermis to the superficial aponeurosis using a L11‐3 linear array transducer.
Figure 1

Diagram of experimental setup and timeline. VO 2, oxygen uptake; HR, heart rate; BP, blood pressure; VL, vastus lateralis muscle; MG, medial gastrocnemius muscle; SmO2, skeletal muscle oxygenation.

Diagram of experimental setup and timeline. VO 2, oxygen uptake; HR, heart rate; BP, blood pressure; VL, vastus lateralis muscle; MG, medial gastrocnemius muscle; SmO2, skeletal muscle oxygenation. Following a three minute baseline and 30‐sec passive warm‐up at 30 rpm (to overcome initial inertia on the belt drive mechanism), participants performed 3 min of light and three and a half minutes of moderately intense bouts of steady‐state recumbent leg cycling before (PRE), during (β 1‐blocked), and 45‐min following (POST) intravenous infusion of esmolol. Pedaling cadence was 60 rpm and was monitored by the participant and laboratory personnel via digital display. Light and moderately intense bouts of exercise were determined by a target HR of 110 beats/min and 150 beats/min, respectively. Exercise and infusion protocols have been previously described (Muller et al. 2017) and are outlined in Figure 1. Based on data obtained in previous studies and clinical guidelines (Muller et al. 2017), we chose to administer esmolol hydrochloride (2500 mg in 250 mL) intravenously as 0.5 mg/kg FFM/min for 3 min followed by 0.25 mg/kg FFM/min maintenance dose.

Data collection and statistical analysis

HR and BP were collected continuously at 200 Hz and analyzed offline (Powerlab 16SP, ADInstruments). NIRS SmO2 was measured continuously at 2 Hz and transmitted wirelessly via ANT+ to a laptop computer for offline analysis (PeriPedal v2.4.8). Pulmonary gas exchange was measured and analyzed offline (ParvoMedics). Statistics were performed using IBM SPSS 24.0. A 3 drug treatment (PRE, β‐blocked, POST) × 3 intensity (baseline, light intensity, moderate intensity) repeated measures ANOVA was conducted on the raw physiological measures. When a significant drug x intensity interaction was observed, paired t‐tests were conducted for the moderate intensity time point only. To determine effect sizes, Cohen's d values were calculated as t‐statistic/square root of the sample size. Cohen's d values > 0.8 were considered to be “strong” effect sizes. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise noted. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Eight subjects participated in this study. Physical characteristics and peak cycle exercise responses are provided in Table 1 and reflect the fact that these participants were healthy with average levels of cardiorespiratory fitness. As expected, the steady state respiratory and RPE responses to exercise were similar before, during, and after β1 blockade with esmolol (Table 2, all P > 0.5). However, compared to preblockade conditions, O2 pulse was greater with β‐1 blockade (i.e., suggestive of greater stroke volume) at both light (P = 0.008, Cohen's d = 1.60) and moderate (P = 0.009, Cohen's d = 1.10) workloads. As noted in Figure 2, the HR response to exercise was attenuated by esmolol (P < 0.001 compared to the Pretrial) and this HR response was restored 45 min after ending the esmolol infusion (P < 0.001 compared to beta‐blocked trial). In a similar way, the systolic BP response was attenuated by esmolol (P < 0.001 compared to the Pretrial) and was restored 45 min after ending the esmolol infusion (P = 0.001 compared to beta‐blocked trial). As noted in Figure 2, NIRS responses in the VL and MG muscle were lower (i.e., more oxygen extraction) during beta‐blockade with esmolol compared to preblockade (P = 0.001 for the VL and P = 0.022 for the MG, Cohen's d = 0.76 and 1.86, respectively). These NIRS responses were restored 45 min after ending the esmolol infusion in both the VL muscle (P = 0.001, Cohen's d = 2.22) and MG muscle (P = 0.001, Cohen's d = 3.60). NIRS responses for each subject are shown in Figure 3.
Table 2

Effect of esmolol on systemic responses to light and moderate intensity leg cycling

PRE β1 blockadePOST
VO2 (L/min)
Light1.35 ± 0.131.37 ± 0.091.42 ± 0.10
Moderate1.75 ± 0.131.73 ± 0.181.76 ± 0.14
Oxygen pulse (mL O2/beat)
Light11.5 ± 1.413.1 ± 2.2a 12.1 ± 1.8
Moderate12.9 ± 1.715.0 ± 2.8a 12.9 ± 1.8
RER
Light0.94 ± 0.100.85 ± 0.090.84 ± 0.08
Moderate1.03 ± 0.041.00 ± 0.060.99 ± 0.05
RPE
Light12 (10–13)12 (10–14)10 (8–13)
Moderate14 (13–18)16 (14–19)16 (13–18)

VO2, oxygen uptake; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; RPE, rating of perceived exertion. Data are mean ± SD except for RPE which is median (min‐max).

Indicates P < 0.05 compared to Pretrial.

Figure 2

Heart rate, systolic BP, and muscle oxygen saturation (SmO2) responses at baseline rest (seated on bike), and during light and moderate intensity cycling during the esmolol study visit. PRE, responses measured before esmolol was infused. β‐blocked, responses measured during esmolol maintenance infusion. POST, responses measured ~45 min after esmolol infusion was discontinued. * P < 0.05 comparing PRE to Beta‐ blocked; † P < 0.05 comparing POST to Beta‐blocked; ‡ P < 0.05 comparing PRE to POST.

Figure 3

Individual oxygen saturation response patterns in the vastus lateralis (VL) muscle from the esmolol study visit. PRE (dashed black line), β‐blocked (solid black line), and POST (dashed gray line) trial values were normalized to the % saturation obtained at the end of the 30 sec assisted pedaling phase for each trial (zeroed to the horizontal line). ATT, adipose tissue thickness over the VL muscle.

Effect of esmolol on systemic responses to light and moderate intensity leg cycling VO2, oxygen uptake; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; RPE, rating of perceived exertion. Data are mean ± SD except for RPE which is median (min‐max). Indicates P < 0.05 compared to Pretrial. Heart rate, systolic BP, and muscle oxygen saturation (SmO2) responses at baseline rest (seated on bike), and during light and moderate intensity cycling during the esmolol study visit. PRE, responses measured before esmolol was infused. β‐blocked, responses measured during esmolol maintenance infusion. POST, responses measured ~45 min after esmolol infusion was discontinued. * P < 0.05 comparing PRE to Beta‐ blocked; † P < 0.05 comparing POST to Beta‐blocked; ‡ P < 0.05 comparing PRE to POST. Individual oxygen saturation response patterns in the vastus lateralis (VL) muscle from the esmolol study visit. PRE (dashed black line), β‐blocked (solid black line), and POST (dashed gray line) trial values were normalized to the % saturation obtained at the end of the 30 sec assisted pedaling phase for each trial (zeroed to the horizontal line). ATT, adipose tissue thickness over the VL muscle.

Discussion

This study examined the effects of the short‐acting β 1‐blocker esmolol on NIRS‐based estimates of active muscle O2 saturation during large muscle mass exercise. Consistent with our hypothesis, esmolol infusion at a dose sufficient to reduce exercise HR ~12–20 beats/min (10–15%) produced an O2 supply‐demand mismatch that evoked greater leg exercise‐induced reductions in SmO2 within the active muscles of healthy adults. The augmented drop in leg SmO2 (1) occurred rapidly, (2) was observed during both work intensities in most of these subjects, (3) was observed in both muscles examined, and (4) was quickly reversible. These findings provide strong evidence of the dynamic coupling that exists between systemic O2 delivery and active muscle O2 extraction when systemic demand for blood flow is high. This study also demonstrates the utility of these combined methods for investigating acute adjustments in O2 delivery and peripheral O2 extraction in exercising humans.

Effects of esmolol on exercising muscle O2 saturation

A widening of the systemic arteriovenous O2 difference has long been recognized as a compensatory adjustment during exercise in β–blocked humans (Gullestad et al. 1996; Hughson and Kowalchuk 1991; MacFarlane et al. 1983; Tesch 1985). Pawelczyk et al. (1992) observed a lower femoral venous O2 content during submaximal cycling in healthy young adults following metoprolol infusion, supporting the idea that the legs are likely contributing to this augmented systemic O2 extraction. This study is the first to directly assess the effects of systemic β‐blockade on O2 extraction within individual exercising human muscles. Our use of NIRS in combination with esmolol revealed an augmented drop in leg SmO2 that was remarkably sensitive to changes in muscle oxygen demand (i.e., exercise intensity and restoration after metabolism of the drug). The rapid and reversible nature of this augmented deoxygenation response, its consistency across all 8 subjects studied (Fig. 3), and our use of an effective dose/selective β 1–blocker (without peripheral vascular effects) strongly support a cause‐effect relationship between acute lowering of cardiac pump function and augmented O2 extraction in the active leg muscles. Future studies could assess the effects of acute BP lowering per se (via alpha‐adrenergic blockade; see (Mortensen et al. 2017) on individual muscle NIRS responses to more thoroughly test this hypothesis.

Effects of esmolol on systemic adjustments to exercise

Systemic oxygen uptake (VO2) during the final 20 sec of each work intensity was unaltered by esmolol infusion (Table 2). This finding is consistent with most previous β 1‐blockade studies of healthy subjects during steady state, submaximal exercise (Epstein et al. 1965; Pawelczyk et al. 1992; Tesch 1985) and suggests that gross exercise efficiency is unaltered by acute administration of these cardioselective drugs. As expected, esmolol reduced the tachycardia of exercise (Fig. 2). We did not directly measure cardiac output for calculations of stroke volume, but did observe consistent and significant increases in O2 pulse during the esmolol trial (average of 1.5 to 2.0 mL/beat higher vs. PRE; Table 2). This effect disappeared 45 min after termination of the esmolol maintenance infusion. These O2 pulse responses, while indirect (Crisafulli et al. 2007), are consistent with multiple previous investigations that reported increases in stroke volume during light and moderately intense exercise under β‐blockade (Tesch 1985). The significant reduction in systolic BP at both work intensities (Fig. 2) is also comparable to prior studies (Deegan and Wood 1994; Reilly et al. 1985) likely reflecting the negative inotropic effects of esmolol on the heart (Gorcsan et al. 1997; Weidemann et al. 2002). Mean BP was also lower at both workloads during esmolol (data not shown). This reduction in MAP, coupled with the reductions seen in SmO2, is consistent with an acute reduction in active muscle blood flow due to esmolol.

Experimental considerations

As stated in the Methods, subjects in this study were part of a larger investigation examining the HR lowering effects of esmolol versus propranolol (Muller et al. 2017). This dictated the use of absolute HR rather than %VO2 peak to establish the two cycle ergometer work rates used in the present analysis. The age range for this larger study was also intentionally broad (22–67 year) and included both sexes, with no control for the menstrual cycle timing in the two younger women. Finally, maximal HR and VO2 were determined during treadmill screening testing, and not during recumbent cycle exercise. In combination, these factors created a moderately heterogeneous sample (young men and women in their 20s, and three men in their 60s) and precluded our ability to match relative work intensities (i.e., % of recumbent cycle VO2 peak) across subjects. Despite this heterogeneity we observed rapid and reversible effects of esmolol on exercising muscle SmO2 in all 8 subjects (Fig. 3), suggesting a clear impact of this short‐acting β 1‐selective antagonist on exercising muscle O2 extraction in healthy humans regardless of age. The NIRS device used in this study detects relative changes in SmO2 with good temporal resolution (McManus et al. 2018), but does not allow for adipose tissue thickness (ATT) corrections of SmO2. The influence ATT on relative SmO2 changes can be seen in Figure 3, where individuals with higher values (particularly the 2 women) tended to have smaller exercise‐induced reductions in SmO2. However, no subject in this study had an ATT value (thigh or calf) that exceeded the maximal NIRS signal penetration depth of this device (~12.5 mm). Thus we believe the SmO2 data reported in these subjects are reflective of changes within the underlying muscle and not adipose tissue or skin. This is further suggested by the fact that relative changes in SmO2 in this study were influenced by (1) exercise intensity (moderate > light in the VL muscle; (Hug and Dorel 2009)), (2) expected muscle group recruitment pattern (VL > MG; (Hug and Dorel 2009)), and (3) drug appearance and removal from the circulation (ON esmolol > OFF esmolol). Slower adjustments in O2 uptake at exercise onset, an effect thought to result specifically from blockade of β 1 receptors (Hughson and Kowalchuk 1991), could have occurred during esmolol infusion. However, we did not design this study or use a system to measure breath‐by‐breath VO2 responses. Due to its short half‐life, however, esmolol would be a potentially powerful experimental intervention to explore VO2 kinetics of human exercise, which typically requires multiple trials at a given workload measured on the same day.

Conclusions and Perspectives

In summary, we found that systemic β 1 receptor blockade with esmolol rapidly and reversibly increases O2 extraction in the active limb muscles. These findings in healthy, non‐exercise trained adults demonstrate the marked effects that β–blocking drugs can have on O2 supply‐demand balance in specific limb muscles during exercise at submaximal intensities encountered during everyday life. Detrimental effects of esmolol on steady state exercise responses (e.g., whole body VO2/efficiency) were not observed, but future studies should examine whether muscle O2 extraction adjustments at the onset of exercise are slowed by these drugs, both in healthy and clinical populations. Increases in peripheral O2 extraction, particularly within the leg muscles, represent an essential physiological adjustment to increases in whole body O2 demand elicited by exercise and other activities of daily living. For patients with limited cardiac function (Hughson and Kowalchuk 1991), and for those prescribed/taking β blockers on a regular or short‐term basis, this widening of the arteriovenous O2 difference becomes even more important. The present finding that healthy non‐medicated adults across a broad age range exhibit rapid and intensity‐dependent reductions in exercising leg SmO2 when β 1 receptors are acutely blocked, suggests that human leg muscles are intrinsically well‐equipped to meet these systemic demands.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.
  31 in total

Review 1.  The use of muscle near-infrared spectroscopy in sport, health and medical sciences: recent developments.

Authors:  Takafumi Hamaoka; Kevin K McCully; Masatsugu Niwayama; Britton Chance
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Electromyographic analysis of pedaling: a review.

Authors:  François Hug; Sylvain Dorel
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  Estimating stroke volume from oxygen pulse during exercise.

Authors:  Antonio Crisafulli; Francesco Piras; Paolo Chiappori; Stefano Vitelli; Marcello A Caria; Andrea Lobina; Raffaele Milia; Filippo Tocco; Alberto Concu; Franco Melis
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Alpha adrenergic receptor blockade increases capillarization and fractional O2 extraction and lowers blood flow in contracting human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  S P Mortensen; S Egginton; M Madsen; J B Hansen; G D W Munch; U W Iepsen; T Åkerström; B K Pedersen; Y Hellsten
Journal:  Acta Physiol (Oxf)       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 6.311

5.  Quantitative assessment of alterations in regional left ventricular contractility with color-coded tissue Doppler echocardiography. Comparison with sonomicrometry and pressure-volume relations.

Authors:  J Gorcsan; D P Strum; W A Mandarino; V K Gulati; M R Pinsky
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-05-20       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  beta Blockade after myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta regression analysis.

Authors:  N Freemantle; J Cleland; P Young; J Mason; J Harrison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-06-26

7.  Ultra-short-acting beta-blockade: a comparison with conventional beta-blockade.

Authors:  C S Reilly; M Wood; R P Koshakji; A J Wood
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 8.  Near-infrared spectroscopy and skeletal muscle oxidative function in vivo in health and disease: a review from an exercise physiology perspective.

Authors:  Bruno Grassi; Valentina Quaresima
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Leg vasoconstriction during dynamic exercise with reduced cardiac output.

Authors:  J A Pawelczyk; B Hanel; R A Pawelczyk; J Warberg; N H Secher
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1992-11

Review 10.  β-Adrenergic blockade in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  William H Frishman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.457

View more
  2 in total

1.  Esmolol acutely alters oxygen supply-demand balance in exercising muscles of healthy humans.

Authors:  David N Proctor; J Carter Luck; Stephan R Maman; Urs A Leuenberger; Matthew D Muller
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2018-04

2.  Increasing Energy Flux to Maintain Diet-Induced Weight Loss.

Authors:  Christopher L Melby; Hunter L Paris; R Drew Sayer; Christopher Bell; James O Hill
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 5.717

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.