Literature DB >> 2966418

Lumbar spine: postoperative MR imaging with Gd-DTPA.

M G Hueftle1, M T Modic, J S Ross, T J Masaryk, J R Carter, R G Wilber, H H Bohlman, P M Steinberg, R B Delamarter.   

Abstract

Thirty patients with failed back surgery syndrome were studied to evaluate the effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid/dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) in differentiating postoperative epidural fibrosis (scar) from recurrent disk herniation. Pre- and postcontrast MR images were interpreted without access to other diagnostic, surgical, or pathologic findings. Seventeen patients had surgical and pathologic correlation of the MR findings at 19 disk levels. The precontrast studies had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 100%, 71%, and 89%, respectively. The enhanced MR studies correctly depicted the character of abnormal epidural soft tissue in 17 patients at all 19 levels. Scar showed heterogeneous enhancement on the early T1-weighted spin-echo images obtained within 10 minutes after contrast material administration. Herniated disk did not show significant enhancement on the early studies but showed variable degrees of enhancement on delayed images in nine of 12 cases. Other criteria were found to be less useful than the pattern of enhancement. Results indicate that precontrast and early postcontrast T1-weighted spin-echo studies are highly accurate in separating epidural fibrosis from herniated disk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2966418     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.167.3.2966418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  27 in total

1.  Ionic versus nonionic paramagnetic contrast media in differentiating between postoperative scar and recurrent disk.

Authors:  Jui-Sheng Hsu; Gin-Chung Liu; Shih-Hsien Chen; Twei-Shiun Jaw; Wun-Jer Shen; Chiao-Yun Chen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  [MRT diagnosis for degenerative changes in the spine].

Authors:  T Kahn; U Quäschling; V Engelbrecht
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  [Feasibilities and bounds of diagnostic radiology in case of back pain].

Authors:  W Pennekamp; G Rduch; V Nicolas
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatology.

Authors:  C W Heron
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  New applications of MR contrast agents in neuroradiology.

Authors:  G Sze
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  The use of intravenous gadopentetate dimeglumine in magnetic resonance imaging of synovial lesions.

Authors:  C G Whitten; T E Moore; W T Yuh; M H Kathol; D L Renfrew; C W Walker
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging--2: Clinical uses.

Authors:  P Armstrong; S F Keevil
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-07-13

8.  MRI after successful lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  J W Van Goethem; E Van de Kelft; I G Biltjes; B A van Hasselt; L van den Hauwe; P M Parizel; A M De Schepper
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Fat-suppression contrast-enhanced MRI in the failed back surgery syndrome: a prospective study.

Authors:  B A Georgy; J R Hesselink; M S Middleton
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Contrast-enhanced MRI versus myelography and contrast-enhanced CT in postdiskectomy problems.

Authors:  M Annertz; G Hägglund; S Holtås; B Jönsson; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.