Literature DB >> 29663613

Distribution and progression of add power among people in need of near correction.

Xiaotong Han1,2, Pei Ying Lee2, Chi Liu3, Mingguang He1,2.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: This study helps to better understand the need and trend in presbyopic add power in the aging society.
BACKGROUND: Distribution and progression of presbyopic add power in East Asian population is largely unknown.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: About 303 participants from a population-based study of residents aged 35 years and older in Guangzhou, China.
METHODS: Visual acuity (VA) test and non-cycloplegic automated refraction were performed at baseline in 2008 and the 6-year follow-up per standardized protocol. Participants with presenting near VA ≤ 20/40 underwent distance subjective refraction and add power measurement by increasing plus lens at a standard distance of 40 cm at each visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Add power at baseline and follow-ups.
RESULTS: Mean (standard deviation) age of the study participants was 57.6 (11.1) years and 50.2% were female. The mean add power at baseline was 1.43, 1.73, 2.03 and 2.20 diopters (D) for individuals in the age groups of 35-44, 45-54, 55-64 and 65+ years, respectively. Participants with older age and lower educational level had significantly higher add power requirements (P < 0.001). The overall 6-year increase in add power was 0.15D (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.25), and was smaller in myopic subjects (P = 0.03). Baseline age and add power, but not changes in biometric factors, were associated with longitudinal change in add power (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Distribution and progression of add power in Chinese was different from that previously suggested by Caucasian studies. More studies are needed to establish up-to-date age-related add power prescription norms for population of different ethnicities.
© 2018 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  add power; epidemiology; longitudinal; presbyopia

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29663613      PMCID: PMC6191378          DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  20 in total

1.  [Variables related to the first presbyopia correction].

Authors:  J L García Serrano; R López Raya; T Mylonopoulos Caripidis
Journal:  Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol       Date:  2002-11

2.  A population-based assessment of presbyopia in the state of Andhra Pradesh, south India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study.

Authors:  Praveen K Nirmalan; Sannapaneni Krishnaiah; Bindiganavale R Shamanna; Gullapalli N Rao; Ravi Thomas
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of sex differences in presbyopia.

Authors:  Adam Hickenbotham; Austin Roorda; Craig Steinmaus; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Presbyopia; comparative observations of white and Negro populations.

Authors:  L L COVELL
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1950-08       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Population-based study of presbyopia in Shahroud, Iran.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Mehdi Khabazkhoob; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Shiva Mehravaran; Mohammad Hassan Emamian; AbbasAli Yekta; Mohammad Shariati; Akbar Fotouhi
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Prevalence, Correlates, and Impact of Uncorrected Presbyopia in a Multiethnic Asian Population.

Authors:  Ryan Eyn Kidd Man; Eva Katie Fenwick; Charumathi Sabanayagam; Ling-Jun Li; Preeti Gupta; Yih-Chung Tham; Tien Yin Wong; Ching-Yu Cheng; Ecosse Luc Lamoureux
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  The geographic factor in the onset of presbyopia.

Authors:  M N Miranda
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1979

8.  A retrospective study on presbyopia onset and progression in a Hispanic population.

Authors:  Tony Carnevali; Pinhkeo Southaphanh
Journal:  Optometry       Date:  2005-01

9.  The Global Burden of Potential Productivity Loss from Uncorrected Presbyopia.

Authors:  Kevin D Frick; Susan M Joy; David A Wilson; Kovin S Naidoo; Brien A Holden
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 10.  Presbyopia. Emerging from a blur towards an understanding of the molecular basis for this most common eye condition.

Authors:  Roger John Truscott
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.467

View more
  2 in total

1.  Classification of Presbyopia by Severity.

Authors:  Marguerite B McDonald; Melissa Barnett; Ian B Gaddie; Paul Karpecki; Francis Mah; Kelly K Nichols; William B Trattler
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2021-10-28

Review 2.  Presbyopia - A Review of Current Treatment Options and Emerging Therapies.

Authors:  James A Katz; Paul M Karpecki; Alexandra Dorca; Sima Chiva-Razavi; Heather Floyd; Elizabeth Barnes; Mark Wuttke; Eric Donnenfeld
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.