Literature DB >> 29663254

Novel insights into the genetic background of genetically modified mice.

Peter Dobrowolski1, Melina Fischer2, Ronald Naumann3.   

Abstract

Unclear or misclassified genetic background of laboratory rodents or a lack of strain awareness causes a number of difficulties in performing or reproducing scientific experiments. Until now, genetic differentiation between strains and substrains of inbred mice has been a challenge. We have developed a screening method for analyzing inbred strains regarding their genetic background. It is based on 240 highly informative short tandem repeat (STR) markers covering the 19 autosomes as well as X and Y chromosomes. Combination of analysis results for presence of known C57BL/6 substrain-specific mutations together with autosomal STR markers and the Y-chromosomal STR-haplotype provides a comprehensive snapshot of the genetic background of mice. In this study, the genetic background of 72 mouse lines obtained from 18 scientific institutions in Germany and Austria was determined. By analyzing only 3 individuals per genetically modified line it was possible to detect mixed genetic backgrounds frequently. In several lines presence of a mispairing Y chromosome was detected. At least every second genetically modified line displayed a mixed genetic background which could lead to unexpected and non-reproducible results, irrespective of the investigated gene of interest.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C57BL/6; Genetic background determination; Genetically modified mice; STR-genotyping; Substrain-specific mutations; Y chromosome

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29663254     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-018-0073-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  13 in total

1.  Genetic polymorphisms among C57BL/6 mouse inbred strains.

Authors:  Esther Zurita; Mónica Chagoyen; Marta Cantero; Rosario Alonso; Anna González-Neira; Alejandro López-Jiménez; José Antonio López-Moreno; Carlisle P Landel; Javier Benítez; Florencio Pazos; Lluís Montoliu
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Reproducibility blues.

Authors:  Bernd Pulverer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Behavioral differences among C57BL/6 substrains: implications for transgenic and knockout studies.

Authors:  Camron D Bryant; Nanci N Zhang; Greta Sokoloff; Michael S Fanselow; Helena S Ennes; Abraham A Palmer; James A McRoberts
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.250

4.  Large deletion on the Y-chromosome long arm (Yq) of C57BL/6JBomTac inbred mice.

Authors:  Melina Fischer; Nadezda Kosyakova; Thomas Liehr; Peter Dobrowolski
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Transgenerational genetic effects of the paternal Y chromosome on daughters' phenotypes.

Authors:  Vicki R Nelson; Sabrina H Spiezio; Joseph H Nadeau
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.778

6.  Mispairing C57BL/6 substrains of genetically engineered mice and wild-type controls can lead to confounding results as it did in studies of JNK2 in acetaminophen and concanavalin A liver injury.

Authors:  Mohammed Bourdi; John S Davies; Lance R Pohl
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.739

7.  Genetic modifiers of the phenotype of mice deficient in mitochondrial superoxide dismutase.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Huang; Mohammed Naeemuddin; Sailaja Elchuri; Mutsuo Yamaguchi; Heather M Kozy; Elaine J Carlson; Charles J Epstein
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Striking Immune Phenotypes in Gene-Targeted Mice Are Driven by a Copy-Number Variant Originating from a Commercially Available C57BL/6 Strain.

Authors:  Vinay S Mahajan; Ezana Demissie; Hamid Mattoo; Vinay Viswanadham; Ajit Varki; Robert Morris; Shiv Pillai
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Y genetic variation and phenotypic diversity in health and disease.

Authors:  Laure K Case; Cory Teuscher
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.027

10.  Agouti C57BL/6N embryonic stem cells for mouse genetic resources.

Authors:  Stephen J Pettitt; Qi Liang; Xin Y Rairdan; Jennifer L Moran; Haydn M Prosser; David R Beier; Kent C Lloyd; Allan Bradley; William C Skarnes
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  5 in total

1.  Substrains matter in phenotyping of C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Mekada; Atsushi Yoshiki
Journal:  Exp Anim       Date:  2021-01-14

2.  Genetic quality assurance and genetic monitoring of laboratory mice and rats: FELASA Working Group Report.

Authors:  Fernando Benavides; Thomas Rülicke; Jan-Bas Prins; James Bussell; Ferdinando Scavizzi; Paolo Cinelli; Yann Herault; Dirk Wedekind
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.471

3.  Genetic Background but Not Intestinal Microbiota After Co-Housing Determines Hyperoxaluria-Related Nephrocalcinosis in Common Inbred Mouse Strains.

Authors:  Qiuyue Ma; Melissa Grigorescu; Adrian Schreiber; Ralph Kettritz; Maja Lindenmeyer; Hans-Joachim Anders; Stefanie Steiger
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  Controlling the uncontrolled variation in the diet induced obese mouse by microbiomic characterization.

Authors:  Valeriia Bondarenko; Cecillie Reynolds Løkke; Peter Dobrowolski; Caroline Junker Mentzel; Josué L Castro-Mejía; Camilla Hartmann Friis Hansen; Dorte Bratbo Sørensen; Dennis Sandris Nielsen; Lukasz Krych; Axel Kornerup Hansen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  Companion Animals as Models for Inhibition of STAT3 and STAT5.

Authors:  Matthias Kieslinger; Alexander Swoboda; Nina Kramer; Barbara Pratscher; Birgitt Wolfesberger; Iwan A Burgener
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.