AIMS: Recent evidence suggests that transgenerational genetic effects contribute to phenotypic variation in complex traits. To test for the general occurrence of these effects and to estimate their strength, we took advantage of chromosome substitution strains (CSSs) of mice where the Y chromosome of the host strain has been replaced with the Y chromosome of the donor strain. Daughters of these CSS-Y males and host strain females are genetically identical and should be phenotypically indistinguishable in the absence of transgenerational genetic effects of the fathers' Y chromosome on daughters' phenotypes. MATERIALS & METHODS: Assay results for a broad panel of physiological traits and behaviors were compared for genetically identical daughters of CSS-Y males and host strain females from the B6-Chr(A/J) and B6-Chr(PWD) panels of CSSs. In addition, behavioral traits including specific tests for anxiety-related behaviors were tested in daughters of B6-Chr(129) and 129-Chr(B6) CSS-Y males. RESULTS: Across a panel of 41 multigenic traits assayed in the B6-Chr(A/J) panel of CSSs females and 21 multigenic traits in the B6-Chr(PWD) panel females, the frequency and strength for transgenerational genetic effects were remarkably similar to those for conventional inheritance of substituted chromosomes. In addition, we found strong evidence that the Y chromosome from the 129 inbred strain significantly reduced anxiety levels among daughters of B6-Chr(129) CSS-Y males. CONCLUSION: We found that transgenerational genetic effects rival conventional genetic effects in frequency and strength, we suggest that some phenotypic variation found in conventional studies of complex traits are attributable in part to the action of genetic variants in previous generations, and we propose that transgenerational genetic effects contribute to 'missing heritability'.
AIMS: Recent evidence suggests that transgenerational genetic effects contribute to phenotypic variation in complex traits. To test for the general occurrence of these effects and to estimate their strength, we took advantage of chromosome substitution strains (CSSs) of mice where the Y chromosome of the host strain has been replaced with the Y chromosome of the donor strain. Daughters of these CSS-Y males and host strain females are genetically identical and should be phenotypically indistinguishable in the absence of transgenerational genetic effects of the fathers' Y chromosome on daughters' phenotypes. MATERIALS & METHODS: Assay results for a broad panel of physiological traits and behaviors were compared for genetically identical daughters of CSS-Y males and host strain females from the B6-Chr(A/J) and B6-Chr(PWD) panels of CSSs. In addition, behavioral traits including specific tests for anxiety-related behaviors were tested in daughters of B6-Chr(129) and 129-Chr(B6) CSS-Y males. RESULTS: Across a panel of 41 multigenic traits assayed in the B6-Chr(A/J) panel of CSSs females and 21 multigenic traits in the B6-Chr(PWD) panel females, the frequency and strength for transgenerational genetic effects were remarkably similar to those for conventional inheritance of substituted chromosomes. In addition, we found strong evidence that the Y chromosome from the 129 inbred strain significantly reduced anxiety levels among daughters of B6-Chr(129) CSS-Y males. CONCLUSION: We found that transgenerational genetic effects rival conventional genetic effects in frequency and strength, we suggest that some phenotypic variation found in conventional studies of complex traits are attributable in part to the action of genetic variants in previous generations, and we propose that transgenerational genetic effects contribute to 'missing heritability'.
Authors: Martijn Kedde; Markus J Strasser; Bijan Boldajipour; Joachim A F Oude Vrielink; Krasimir Slanchev; Carlos le Sage; Remco Nagel; P Mathijs Voorhoeve; Josyanne van Duijse; Ulf Andersson Ørom; Anders H Lund; Anastassis Perrakis; Erez Raz; Reuven Agami Journal: Cell Date: 2007-12-28 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Kay D Wagner; Nicole Wagner; Hossein Ghanbarian; Valérie Grandjean; Pierre Gounon; François Cuzin; Minoo Rassoulzadegan Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Man-Yee J Lam; Jason D Heaney; Kirsten K Youngren; Jean H Kawasoe; Joseph H Nadeau Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2007-07-05 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Ida Holásková; Jennifer Franko; Robert L Goodman; Arthur P Arnold; Rosana Schafer Journal: Am J Reprod Immunol Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 3.886