| Literature DB >> 29663171 |
Maarten M J Wijnenga1, Pim J French1, Hendrikus J Dubbink2, Winand N M Dinjens2, Peggy N Atmodimedjo2, Johan M Kros2, Ruth Fleischeuer3, Clemens M F Dirven4, Arnaud J P E Vincent4, Martin J van den Bent5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: At current prognostication of low grade glioma remains suboptimal and might be improved with additional markers. These may guide treatment decisions, in particular on early adjuvant therapy versus wait and see after surgery.Entities:
Keywords: 7q; 9p21.3; Glioma; IDH; Low-grade; Molecular markers
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29663171 PMCID: PMC6096891 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2867-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurooncol ISSN: 0167-594X Impact factor: 4.130
Patient characteristics
| Characteristics | Oligodendroglioma | Astrocytoma IDHmt | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | ||
| Patients (n) | 95 | 112 | |||
| Sex | 0.149 | ||||
| Male | 49 | 51.6 | 71 | 63.4 | |
| Female | 46 | 48.4 | 41 | 36.6 | |
| Age | < 0.0001 | ||||
| Median (IQR) | 45 | (37–52) | 37 | (29–45) | |
| Type of 1st surgery | 0.002† | ||||
| Awake craniotomy | 51 | 53.7 | 54 | 48.2 | |
| Normal resection | 23 | 24.2 | 49 | 43.8 | |
| Open biopsy | 7 | 7.4 | 2 | 1.8 | |
| Stereotactic biopsy | 14 | 14.7 | 7 | 6.2 | |
| Preoperative KPS | 0.064 | ||||
| Median (IQR) | 100 | (100–100) | 100 | (90–100) | |
| Histopathological diagnosis | |||||
| Grade II astrocytoma | 8 | 8.4 | 87 | 77.7 | |
| Grade II oligodendroglioma | 77 | 81.1 | 9 | 8.0 | |
| Grade II oligo-astrocytoma | 10 | 10.5 | 16 | 14.3 | |
| Treatment after 1st surgery | < 0.0001 | ||||
| Wait and scan | 52 | 54.7 | 52 | 46.4 | |
| Chemotherapy | 24 | 25.3 | 5 | 4.5 | |
| Radiotherapy | 16 | 16.8 | 42 | 37.5 | |
| Chemoradiation | 3 | 3.2 | 13 | 11.6 | |
| Follow-up (years) | |||||
| Median (range) | 8.0 | (0.9–21.7) | 6.1 | (0.4–16.7) | |
†Fisher’s exact test
Fig. 1Oncoprint plot with overview of somatic alterations per patient. At the top of the figure the WHO 2007 and WHO 2016 classification are shown. In the middle part all somatic variants and copy number alterations are shown. Patients are separated based on the WHO 2016 classification. IDH mutated 1p/19q-codeleted patients are depicted in the left part of the figure and IDH mutated astrocytoma patients on the right part of the figure. The bottom part of the figure shows the clinical characteristic age per patient
Frequencies of gene mutations per WHO subgroup
| Gene | IDH mutated astrocytoma | IDH mutated 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | |
|
| 111 | 99.1 | 87 | 91.6 |
|
| 1 | 0.9 | 8 | 8.4 |
|
| 105 | 93.8 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 75 | 67 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 2 | 1.8 | 52 | 54.7 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 36 | 37.9 |
|
| 3 | 2.7 | 91 | 95.8 |
|
| 1 | 0.9 | 2 | 2.1 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 3 | 2.7 | 3 | 3.2 |
|
| 3 | 2.7 | 5 | 5.3 |
Fig. 2Kaplan–Meier plots with overall survival of IDH mutated astrocytoma patients. Kaplan–Meier plots with overall survival of IDH mutated astrocytoma patients stratified for presence of a imbalance pattern consistent with trisomy of chromosome 7, b loss of 9p21.3 region, c loss of chromosomal arm 10q, d and presence of a PTEN mutation
Fig. 3Kaplan–Meier plots with overall survival of IDH mutated 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma patients. Kaplan–Meier plots with overall survival of IDH mutated 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma patients stratified for presence of a Imbalance pattern consistent with trisomy of chromosome 7, b loss of 9p21.3 region, c loss of chromosomal arm 10q, d presence of CIC mutation, e presence of FUBP1 mutation, f and presence of a PTEN mutation