P Darvishi1, P P Batchala1, J T Patrie2, L M Poisson3, M-B Lopes4, R Jain5, C E Fadul6, D Schiff6, S H Patel7. 1. From the Departments of Radiology and Medical Imaging (P.D., P.P.B., S.H.P.). 2. Public Health Sciences (J.T.P.). 3. Department of Public Health (L.M.P.), Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan. 4. Pathology, Divisions of Neuropathology and Molecular Diagnostics (M.-B.L.). 5. Departments of Radiology (R.J.) and Neurosurgery (R.J.), New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York. 6. Division of Neuro-Oncology (C.E.F., D.S.), University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia. 7. From the Departments of Radiology and Medical Imaging (P.D., P.P.B., S.H.P.) shp4k@virginia.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite the improved prognostic relevance of the 2016 WHO molecular-based classification of lower-grade gliomas, variability in clinical outcome persists within existing molecular subtypes. Our aim was to determine prognostically significant metrics on preoperative MR imaging for lower-grade gliomas within currently defined molecular categories. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We undertook a retrospective analysis of 306 patients with lower-grade gliomas accrued from an institutional data base and The Cancer Genome Atlas. Two neuroradiologists in consensus analyzed preoperative MRIs of each lower-grade glioma to determine the following: tumor size, tumor location, number of involved lobes, corpus callosum involvement, hydrocephalus, midline shift, eloquent cortex involvement, ependymal extension, margins, contrast enhancement, and necrosis. Adjusted hazard ratios determined the association between MR imaging metrics and overall survival per molecular subtype, after adjustment for patient age, patient sex, World Health Organization grade, and surgical resection status. RESULTS: For isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type lower-grade gliomas, tumor size (hazard ratio, 3.82; 95% CI, 1.94-7.75; P < .001), number of involved lobes (hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.28-2.27; P < .001), hydrocephalus (hazard ratio, 4.43; 95% CI, 1.12-17.54; P = .034), midline shift (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03-1.30; P = .013), margins (P = .031), and contrast enhancement (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13-0.90; P = .030) were associated with overall survival. For IDH-mutant 1p/19q-codeleted lower-grade gliomas, tumor size (hazard ratio, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.06-7.70; P = .039) and ependymal extension (hazard ratio, 6.34; 95% CI, 1.07-37.59; P = .042) were associated with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging metrics offers prognostic information for patients with lower-grade gliomas within molecularly defined classes, with the greatest prognostic value for IDH wild-type lower-grade gliomas.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite the improved prognostic relevance of the 2016 WHO molecular-based classification of lower-grade gliomas, variability in clinical outcome persists within existing molecular subtypes. Our aim was to determine prognostically significant metrics on preoperative MR imaging for lower-grade gliomas within currently defined molecular categories. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We undertook a retrospective analysis of 306 patients with lower-grade gliomas accrued from an institutional data base and The Cancer Genome Atlas. Two neuroradiologists in consensus analyzed preoperative MRIs of each lower-grade glioma to determine the following: tumor size, tumor location, number of involved lobes, corpus callosum involvement, hydrocephalus, midline shift, eloquent cortex involvement, ependymal extension, margins, contrast enhancement, and necrosis. Adjusted hazard ratios determined the association between MR imaging metrics and overall survival per molecular subtype, after adjustment for patient age, patient sex, World Health Organization grade, and surgical resection status. RESULTS: For isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type lower-grade gliomas, tumor size (hazard ratio, 3.82; 95% CI, 1.94-7.75; P < .001), number of involved lobes (hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.28-2.27; P < .001), hydrocephalus (hazard ratio, 4.43; 95% CI, 1.12-17.54; P = .034), midline shift (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03-1.30; P = .013), margins (P = .031), and contrast enhancement (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13-0.90; P = .030) were associated with overall survival. For IDH-mutant 1p/19q-codeleted lower-grade gliomas, tumor size (hazard ratio, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.06-7.70; P = .039) and ependymal extension (hazard ratio, 6.34; 95% CI, 1.07-37.59; P = .042) were associated with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging metrics offers prognostic information for patients with lower-grade gliomas within molecularly defined classes, with the greatest prognostic value for IDH wild-type lower-grade gliomas.
Authors: Sohil H Patel; Laila M Poisson; Daniel J Brat; Yueren Zhou; Lee Cooper; Matija Snuderl; Cheddhi Thomas; Ana M Franceschi; Brent Griffith; Adam E Flanders; John G Golfinos; Andrew S Chi; Rajan Jain Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Y W Park; K Han; S S Ahn; S Bae; Y S Choi; J H Chang; S H Kim; S-G Kang; S-K Lee Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: E Aliotta; H Nourzadeh; P P Batchala; D Schiff; M B Lopes; J T Druzgal; S Mukherjee; S H Patel Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Daniel H Lachance; Annette M Molinaro; Kyle M Walsh; Paul A Decker; Hugues Sicotte; Melike Pekmezci; Terri Rice; Matt L Kosel; Ivan V Smirnov; Gobinda Sarkar; Alissa A Caron; Thomas M Kollmeyer; Corinne E Praska; Anisha R Chada; Chandralekha Halder; Helen M Hansen; Lucie S McCoy; Paige M Bracci; Roxanne Marshall; Shichun Zheng; Gerald F Reis; Alexander R Pico; Brian P O'Neill; Jan C Buckner; Caterina Giannini; Jason T Huse; Arie Perry; Tarik Tihan; Mitchell S Berger; Susan M Chang; Michael D Prados; Joseph Wiemels; John K Wiencke; Margaret R Wrensch; Robert B Jenkins Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 176.079
Authors: Kasthuri Kannan; Akiko Inagaki; Joachim Silber; Daniel Gorovets; Jianan Zhang; Edward R Kastenhuber; Adriana Heguy; John H Petrini; Timothy A Chan; Jason T Huse Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2012-10
Authors: David A Joyner; John Garrett; Prem P Batchala; Bharath Rama; Joshua R Ravicz; James T Patrie; Maria-B Lopes; Camilo E Fadul; David Schiff; Rajan Jain; Sohil H Patel Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2022-08-12 Impact factor: 2.995
Authors: Louise Carstam; Alba Corell; Anja Smits; Anna Dénes; Hanna Barchéus; Klara Modin; Helene Sjögren; Sandra Ferreyra Vega; Thomas Olsson Bontell; Helena Carén; Asgeir Store Jakola Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 6.244