| Literature DB >> 29662721 |
Kristin K Jerger1, Laura Lundegard2, Aaron Piepmeier1, Keturah Faurot1, Amanda Ruffino1, Margaret A Jerger1, Aysenil Belger3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Despite the enormous prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), its global impact has yet to be realized. Millions of families worldwide need effective treatments to help them get through everyday challenges like eating, sleeping, digestion, and social interaction. Qigong Sensory Training (QST) is a nonverbal, parent-delivered intervention recently shown to be effective at reducing these everyday challenges in children with ASD. This study tested the feasibility of a protocol for investigating QST's neural mechanism.Entities:
Keywords: Complementary and Alternative Medicine; Qigong Sensory Training; autism; autonomic nervous system; cerebral oximetry; heart rate variability; massage; nonclassical auditory pathway; parasympathetic tone; vagal tone
Year: 2018 PMID: 29662721 PMCID: PMC5894902 DOI: 10.1177/2164956118769006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Adv Health Med ISSN: 2164-9561
Figure 1.Nonclassical auditory and tactile neural pathways include limbic system (left) in contrast to classical paths to primary sensory cortex (gray arrow on right) (diagram adapted from Noise and Health, 2000, http://www.noiseandhealth.org/viewimage.asp?img=NoiseHealth_2000_2_7_49_31742_1.jpg).19
Feasibility Data.
| Families contacted directly | 44 |
| Completed screenings | 26 |
| Number enrolled | 20 |
| Completed visits | 19 (95%) |
| Missing data: auditory threshold | 25% |
| Missing data: cerebral oximetry | 9% |
| Missing data: heart rate variability, interbeat intervals | 6.25% |
| Would you like to be contacted about future studies? (Yes) | 20 (100%) |
| Would you like to bring your child back for additional massage sessions, if there were 2 research sessions like this and 8 other sessions with massage only or massage resting measurements? (Yes) | 19 (95%) |
Sensory Scores from Sensory and Self-Regulation Checklist.
| Sensory Modality | Mean (SD) of Study Population | Mean (SD) of SSC Validation Populations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASD (n = 20) | ASD (n = 99) | Typically developing (n = 138) | |
| Tactile | 27.20 (6.03) | 21.41 (8.30) | 9.91 (5.47) |
| Visual | 3.25 (1.79) | 2.76 (1.67) | 1.09 (1.35) |
| Auditory | 4.85 (3.15) | 6.13 (3.14) | 2.92 (2.47) |
| Smell/taste | 5.95 (2.56) | 6.75 (2.56) | 2.60 (2.05) |
| All | 41.25 (10.72) | 37.05 (12.07) | 16.51 (8.67) |
ASD: autism spectrum disorder; SSC: Sensory and Self-Regulation Checklist
Figure 2.Group mean parasympathetic tone (log10 of high frequency power) during QST massage (blue and gray) or while watching a video about QST massage (orange). The blue and orange groups were treated identically until the start of the intervention (0:00). About 7 min into the intervention, the groups began to diverge, with the measure of parasympathetic tone (HF power) decreasing for the video group and continuing to increase slightly for the massage group. The gray group includes the same children as the orange group, who received the massage at the end of the study visit. We evaluated the trajectory of change in heart rate variability, comparing the massage and video groups (blue and orange lines) using a random effects model with a quadratic term. The model suggested that the trajectories of the 2 groups were different, but the difference did not reach statistical significance at the 0.05 alpha level in this small study, powered for feasibility testing.
Heart Rate Variability Results.
| Pre | Post |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rest | |||
| Massage (n = 11) | 2.75 (0.48) | 2.93 (0.41) | 0.941 |
| Video (n = 6) | 2.62 (0.72) | 2.82 (0.35) | |
| Mean change from rest to faces | |||
| Massage (n = 11) | 0.12 (0.21) | −0.08 (0.32) | 0.036 |
| Video (n = 6) | 0.03 (0.23) | 0.23 (0.19) | |
Figure 3.Comparison of group means and standard errors (next to each endpoint) of CO and HRV measures before and after receiving QST massage (blue) or watching a video about QST massage (orange). The left column shows CO drifting downward (indicating less inhibitory activity) over time during rest, while HRV (high frequency power) increases slightly, indicating greater parasympathetic tone. These changes are seen equally for both groups and likely reflect gradual relaxation as they adapt to the study environment. In contrast, the right column, which shows the mean change from the preceding rest period to the period of viewing emotional faces (to control for drift), shows the groups diverging. While the video group mean reflected a pattern of relaxation (less inhibition, lower oxygen use) or remained the same (HRV), the massage group mean change showed increased CO (more inhibition, more processing) and lower parasympathetic tone while viewing emotional faces. Except for the change in HRV from rest to faces (bottom right, p = 0.036), none of the groups are statistically distinct in this small sample. However, patterns in mean changes may be useful for generating hypotheses to be tested in subsequent studies.
CO, cerebral oximetry; HRV, heart rate variability; PFC, prefrontal cortex.
Mean Percent Oxygenation of Prefrontal Cortex.
| Pre | Post | Change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Condition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rest | ||||||
| Massage (n = 11) | 66.67 (4.04) | 65.70 (3.62) | 64.66 (4.24) | 64.25 (4.74) | −2.01 | −1.45 |
| Video (n = 6) | 67.64 (3.22) | 67.93 (4.86) | 67.03 (4.90) | 67.07 (5.73) | −0.61 | −0.86 |
| Change from rest to faces | ||||||
| Massage (n = 11) | −0.05 (2.57) | 0.233 (1.61) | 1.11 (2.01) | 0.74 (1.88) | 1.16 | 0.51 |
| Video (n = 6) | 0.90 (2.74) | 0.26 (1.61) | 0.53 (1.38) | −0.17 (0.60) | −0.37 | −0.43 |
| Change from rest to faces displaying specific emotions | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Massage (n = 11) | −0.03 (2.65) | 0.38 (1.59) | 0.53 (1.15) | 0.02 (1.59) | 0.56 | −0.36 |
| Video (n = 6) | 0.02 (2.33) | −0.32 (1.51) | 0.12 (1.51) | −0.01 (1.13) | 0.1 | 0.31 |
|
| ||||||
| Massage (n = 11) | 0.33 (2.88) | 1.09 (1.88) | 1.10 (2.38) | 0.91 (1.55) | 0.77 | −0.18 |
| Video (n = 6) | 0.05 (2.86) | 0.18 (1.66) | 0.73 (1.73) | −0.08 (0.73) | 0.68 | −0.26 |
|
| ||||||
| Massage (n = 11) | −0.11 (2.35) | 0.26 (1.88) | 0.82 (2.63) | 0.64 (2.44) | 0.93 | 0.38 |
| Video (n = 6) | 1.78 (2.74) | 0.34 (1.42) | 0.64 (1.09) | −0.32 (0.73) | −1.14 | −0.66 |
|
| ||||||
| Massage (n = 11) | −0.40 (2.82) | −0.80 (2.53) | 1.97 (2.71) | 1.39 (2.84) | 2.37 | 2.19 |
| Video (n = 6) | 1.76 (4.10) | 0.84 (2.71) | 0.64 (1.91) | −0.26 (1.34) | −1.12 | −1.10 |