| Literature DB >> 29662052 |
Li Zhang1,2, Jun Ding3,4, Hanyu Zheng1,2, Sensong An4, Hongtao Lin2, Bowen Zheng4, Qingyang Du2, Gufan Yin2, Jerome Michon2, Yifei Zhang2, Zhuoran Fang2, Mikhail Y Shalaginov2, Longjiang Deng1, Tian Gu5, Hualiang Zhang6, Juejun Hu7.
Abstract
The mid-infrared (mid-IR) is a strategically important band for numerous applications ranging from night vision to biochemical sensing. Here we theoretically analyzed and experimentally realized a Huygens metasurface platform capable of fulfilling a diverse cross-section of optical functions in the mid-IR. The meta-optical elements were constructed using high-index chalcogenide films deposited on fluoride substrates: the choices of wide-band transparent materials allow the design to be scaled across a broad infrared spectrum. Capitalizing on a two-component Huygens' meta-atom design, the meta-optical devices feature an ultra-thin profile (λ0/8 in thickness) and measured optical efficiencies up to 75% in transmissive mode for linearly polarized light, representing major improvements over state-of-the-art. We have also demonstrated mid-IR transmissive meta-lenses with diffraction-limited focusing and imaging performance. The projected size, weight and power advantages, coupled with the manufacturing scalability leveraging standard microfabrication technologies, make the Huygens meta-optical devices promising for next-generation mid-IR system applications.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29662052 PMCID: PMC5902483 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03831-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Simulation results of meta-atoms. a Schematic tilted view of a rectangular meta-atom structure; optical transmission b amplitude and c phase of the rectangular meta-atom as functions of the meta-atom dimensions; d optimized optical transmission of rectangular meta-atoms with different phase delay values: the shaded region corresponds to the “low-efficiency gap” where rectangular meta-atoms fail to provide satisfactory performance; e top-view schematic of an H-shaped meta-atom; f optimized optical transmission of H-shaped meta-atoms with different phase delay values: the design offers superior efficiency to bridge the “low-efficiency gap”; g phase shift and transmittance of the eight meta-atom elements used to construct the meta-optical devices: the corresponding meta-atom designs are also marked in (d) and (f) with red triangles
Fig. 2Material characterization and fabrication process. a Refractive index n and extinction coefficient k of the PbTe material measured using ellipsometry and fitted to a two-layer model; inset shows a schematic depiction of an H-shaped meta-atom; b cross-sectional SEM image of the PbTe film; c surface morphology of PbTe film measured using AFM; d schematic fabrication process flow of the meta-optical devices; e tilted-view SEM image of fabricated metasurface structure
Fig. 3Characterization of diffractive beam deflector. a Top-view SEM image of the HMS beam deflector: the red box marks the unit cell; b simulated electric field profile when a plane wave at 5.2 μm wavelength is incident upon the metasurface from the substrate side, clearly showing the beam deflection effect; c simulated and experimentally evaluated wavelength dependence of the beam deflection angle, error bar originated from accuracy (±0.1) of measurement setup; d experimentally measured spectra for total transmission (sum of all transmissive diffraction orders), 1st diffraction order (the blazed order) and 0th order (specular transmission) of the deflector; e angle-dependent output intensity from the device measured at 5.19 μm wavelength. Inset shows an infrared image of the diffracted beams at the same wavelength
Fig. 4Characterization of cylindrical flat lens. a–c Simulated and d–f measured intensity distributions near the focal spot of the cylindrical lens at the wavelength of a, d 5110 nm, b, e 5200 nm, and c, f 5290 nm; g–i intensity profiles at the focal plane at g 5110 nm, h 5200 nm, and i 5290 nm wavelength: the solid lines represent simulated responses from an ideal lens whereas the dots are experimental data; j wavelength-dependent focal length of the cylindrical lens; k measured transmission efficiency of the cylindrical lens as a function of wavelength; inset shows a top-view optical micrograph of the fabricated meta-lens
Fig. 5Characterization of aspherical meta-lens. a–c Top-view SEM micrographs of the fabricated aspheric meta-lens; d–i measured aspheric lens focal spot profiles at the wavelengths of d 5050 nm, e 5110 nm, f 5200 nm, g 5290 nm, h 5380 nm, and i 5405 nm; the scale bar represents 5 μm; j measured Strehl ratios as a function of wavelength; k focal spot profile evolution along the optical axis at 5200 nm wavelength; inset: measured intensity distributions of the focal spot at 5200 nm wavelength along x- and y-directions on the focal plane in comparison with diffraction-limited focal spot profile. The measurement data are normalized such that the total power on the focal plane (rather than peak intensity) equals that of the diffraction-limited focal spot; l Strehl ratios measured on the optical axis: the shaded region corresponds to focal tolerance of the meta-lens. Error bars for panels jand l are explained in Supplementary Note 7
Fig. 6Image testing results. a–c Optical images of USAF-1951 resolution targets collected using the aspheric meta-lens as a microscope objective: the numbers mark the group numbers of the bar target elements; d–f simulated images of the same groups of bar targets acquired by a hypothetical aberration-free imaging system otherwise identical to the experimental setup. The scale bars correspond to 30 μm