| Literature DB >> 29659501 |
Wenyan Xie1, Matthias F Melzig2.
Abstract
Herbal medicine is now globally accepted as a valid alternative system of pharmaceutical therapies. Various studies around the world have been initiated to develop scientific evidence-based herbal therapies. Recently, the therapeutic potential of medicinal plant derived miRNAs has attracted great attraction. MicroRNAs have been indicated as new bioactive ingredients in medicinal plants. However, the stability of miRNAs during the herbal preparation process and their bioavailability in humans remain unclear. Viscum album L. (European mistletoe) has been widely used in folk medicine for the treatment of cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Our previous study has indicated the therapeutic potential of mistletoe miRNAs by using bioinformatics tools. To evaluate the stability of these miRNAs, various mistletoe extracts that mimic the clinical medicinal use as well as traditional folk medicinal use were prepared. The mistletoe miRNAs including miR166a-3p, miR159a, miR831-5p, val-miR218 and val-miR11 were quantified by stem-loop qRT-PCR. As a result, miRNAs were detectable in the majority of the extracts, indicating that consumption of medicinal plant preparations might introduce miRNAs into mammals. The factors that might cause miRNA degradation include ultrasonic treatment, extreme heat, especially RNase treatment, while to be associated with plant molecules (e.g., proteins, exosomes) might be an efficient way to protect miRNAs against degradation. Our study confirmed the stability of plant derived miRNAs during herb preparations, suggesting the possibility of functionally intact medicinal plant miRNAs in mammals.Entities:
Keywords: Viscum album L.; herb preparations; medicinal plants; microRNAs; mistletoe; stability
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29659501 PMCID: PMC6016954 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23040919
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Comparison of RNA isolated from mistletoe plants and lyophilized mistletoe extracts.
| RNA Parameters | Fresh Plant (FP) | Extract (FP), RT | Extract (FP)-Mechanical Treatment, RT | Dried Plant (DP) | Extract (DP)-Soaked, 80 °C | Extract (DP)-Boiled, 100 °C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNA yield (µg/g) | 630.3 ± 73.5 | 1404.5 ± 531.2 | 1236.9 ± 482.8 | 398.2 ± 109.3 | 931.8 ± 212.7 | 26.9 ± 7.3 |
| A260/A280 | 2.10 ± 0.03 | 2.04 ± 0.05 | 2.00 ± 0.07 | 2.02 ± 0.04 | 1.97 ± 0.03 | 1.67 ± 0.11 |
| A260/A230 | 2.31 ± 0.16 | 2.44 ± 0.09 | 2.54 ± 0.09 | 2.30 ± 0.33 | 2.18 ± 0.15 | 0.80 ± 0.25 |
Sampling and analysis were carried out three independent times. The data regarding mistletoe extracts were extrapolated from dry weight.
The absolute quantification of miRNAs in mistletoe plants and lyophilized mistletoe extracts.
| Plant miRNAs | Linear Range of Ct Values | Dynamic Quantification Range of miRNA Levels | Copy Number of miRNAs per Gram of Mistletoe Plants and Lyophilized Extracts | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh Plant (FP) | Extract (FP), RT | Extract (FP)-Mechanical Treatment, RT | Dried Plant (DP) | Extract (DP)-Soaked, 80 °C | Extract (DP)-Boiled, 100 °C | |||
| miR166a-3p | 13.1–28.5 | 1 nM–10 fM | 5.0 × 1011 ± 8.3 × 1010 | 7.4 × 109 ± 4.6×109 | 1.4 × 109 ± 3.0 × 108 | 1.2 × 1010 ± 6.1 × 109 | 4.2 × 108 ± 2.4 × 108 | NC |
| miR159a | 17.8–32.9 | 1 nM–10 fM | 3.9 × 1011 ± 1.2 × 1011 | 1.1 × 1010 ± 5.3 × 109 | 3.4 × 109 ± 2.0 × 109 | 1.4 × 1010 ± 3.3 × 109 | 6.3 × 107 ± 3.0 × 107 | NC |
| val-miR218 | 15.4–33.0 | 1 nM–10 fM | 7.9 × 109 ± 3.2 × 109 | 6.3 × 109 ± 3.3 × 109 | 2.0 × 109 ± 1.5 × 109 | 3.6 × 109 ± 1.8 × 109 | NC | NC |
| val-miR11 | 20.7–32.6 | 100 pM–10 fM | 1.2 × 108 ± 6.4 × 107 | 4.2 × 107 ± 2.9 × 107 | NC | 2.4 × 107 ± 1.2 × 107 | NC | NC |
| miR831-5p | 15.6–32.7 | 1 nM–1 fM | 3.3 × 107 ± 1.1 × 107 | 7.9 × 106 ± 3.3 × 106 | 2.9 × 106 ± 7.2 × 105 | 1.9 × 107 ± 6.1 × 106 | NC | NC |
| has-let-7a | 20.9–32.7 | 100 pM–10 fM | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC |
Analyses were carried out three independent times. The data regarding mistletoe extracts were extrapolated from dry weight. The miRNA copies were extrapolated from dry weight. NC represents not calculated (the Ct values were outside the linear range). RT represents room temperature.
Figure 1Quality assessment of total RNA isolated from mistletoe preparations by agarose gel electrophoresis. Lane 1: RNA isolated from fresh plant (FP); Lane 2: RNA isolated from mistletoe extract made from FP; Lane 3: RNA isolated from mistletoe extract made from FP treated with mechanical treatment; Lane 4: RNA isolated from dried mistletoe plant (DP); Lane 5: RNA isolated from mistletoe extract made by soaking DP in 80 °C water for 10 min; Lane 6: RNA isolated from mistletoe extract made by boiling DP for 30 min.
Figure 2The raw Ct values of miRNAs in mistletoe plants and lyophilized mistletoe extracts detected by qRT-PCR. The Ct values of val-miR218 and hsa-let-7a in the NTCs were undetectable (Ct > 39). Sampling and analysis were carried out three independent times. The data regarding mistletoe extracts were extrapolated from dry weight. NTC represents no-template controls. RT represents room temperature.
The Ct values of synthetic miRNAs processed together with mistletoe preparations.
| Synthetic miRNAs | Control | Mistletoe Extracts Containing Synthetic miRNAs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extract (FP), RT | Extract (FP)-Mechanical Treatment, RT | Extract (DP)-Soaked, 80 °C | Extract (DP)-Boiled, 100 °C | ||
| hsa-let-7a | 23.34 ± 0.47 | 34.81 ± 0.32 | 35.78 ± 0.79 | 35.63 ± 0.35 | 37.71 ± 0.58 |
| 2′-OMe hsa-let-7a | 23.08 ± 0.43 | 33.09 ± 0.24 | 35.30 ± 0.30 | 35.28 ± 0.70 | 37.14 ± 0.69 |
Sampling and analysis were carried out three independent times.
Figure 3The Ct values of synthetic miRNAs with various treatments. Sampling and analysis were carried out three independent times. “*” represents a significant difference compared with untreated group (p < 0.05); “#” represents a significant difference between hsa-let-7a and 2′-OMe hsa-let-7a group (p < 0.05).
Primers for stem-loop qRT-PCT.
| miRNAs | Sequence | RT Primer | Primer |
|---|---|---|---|
| miR166a-3p | UCGGACCAGGCUUCAUUCCCC | GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGC AATTGCACTGGATACGACGGGGAA | F: AGTCGGACCAGGCTTCA |
| miR159a | UUUGGAUUGAAGGGAGCUCU | GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGC AATTGCACTGGATACGACAGAGCT | F: GCCGTTTGGATTGAAGG |
| miR831-5p | AGGAAGACUGUAGAAGAGAUGAGG | GTCGTATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGC AATTGCACTGGATACGACCCTCAT | F: CTCAGGAAGACTGTAGAAGA |
| val-miR218 | GAUGAUCGCCACGUCGGAGGA | GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTC GCACTGGATACGACTCCTCC | F: AGGGATGATCGCCACG |
| val-miR11 | CACUGUAGCACUUUUGACAAAG | GTCGT ATCCA GTGCA GGGTC CGAGG TATTC GCACT GGATA CGAC CTTTGT | F: GGGCACTGTAGCACTTTTG |
| hsa-let-7a | UGAGGUAGUAGGUUGUAUAGUU | GTCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTATTCGCACTGGATACGACAACTAT | F: GCCGTGAGGTAGTAGGTTGT |