Literature DB >> 29658277

Cavitation Enhancement Increases the Efficiency and Consistency of Chromatin Fragmentation from Fixed Cells for Downstream Quantitative Applications.

Anna M Chiarella1,2, Austin L Quimby1,3, Marjan Mehrab-Mohseni1,4, Brian Velasco4, Sandeep K Kasoji4, Ian J Davis3,5, Paul A Dayton3,4, Nathaniel A Hathaway1,2,3, Samantha G Pattenden1,3.   

Abstract

One of the most sensitive, time-consuming, and variable steps of chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is chromatin sonication. Traditionally, this process can take hours to properly sonicate enough chromatin for multiple ChIP assays. Further, the length of sheared DNA is often inconsistent. In order to faithfully measure chemical and structural changes at the chromatin level, sonication needs to be reliable. Thus, chromatin fragmentation by sonication represents a significant bottleneck to downstream quantitative analysis. To improve the consistency and efficiency of chromatin sonication, we developed and tested a cavitation enhancing reagent based on sonically active nanodroplets. Here, we show that nanodroplets increase sonication efficiency by 16-fold and provide more consistent levels of chromatin fragmentation. Using the previously characterized chromatin in vivo assay (CiA) platform, we generated two distinct chromatin states in order to test nanodroplet-assisted sonication sensitivity in measuring post-translational chromatin marks. By comparing euchromatin to chemically induced heterochromatin at the same CiA:Oct4 locus, we quantitatively measure the capability of our new sonication technique to resolve differences in chromatin structure. We confirm that nanodroplet-assisted sonication results are indistinguishable from those of samples processed with traditional sonication in downstream applications. While the processing time for each sample was reduced from 38.4 to 2.3 min, DNA fragment distribution sizes were significantly more consistent with a coefficient of variation 2.7 times lower for samples sonicated in the presence of nanodroplets. In conclusion, sonication utilizing the nanodroplet cavitation enhancement reagent drastically reduces the amount of processing time and provides consistently fragmented chromatin of high quality for downstream applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29658277      PMCID: PMC5962036          DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  21 in total

Review 1.  In vivo cross-linking and immunoprecipitation for studying dynamic Protein:DNA associations in a chromatin environment.

Authors:  M H Kuo; C D Allis
Journal:  Methods       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Histone H3 lysine 9 methylation is an epigenetic imprint of facultative heterochromatin.

Authors:  Antoine H F M Peters; Jacqueline E Mermoud; Dónal O'Carroll; Michaela Pagani; Dieter Schweizer; Neil Brockdorff; Thomas Jenuwein
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-12-10       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Partitioning and plasticity of repressive histone methylation states in mammalian chromatin.

Authors:  Antoine H F M Peters; Stefan Kubicek; Karl Mechtler; Roderick J O'Sullivan; Alwin A H A Derijck; Laura Perez-Burgos; Alexander Kohlmaier; Susanne Opravil; Makoto Tachibana; Yoichi Shinkai; Joost H A Martens; Thomas Jenuwein
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 4.  HP1 and the dynamics of heterochromatin maintenance.

Authors:  Christèle Maison; Geneviève Almouzni
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 94.444

5.  Design of ultrasonically-activatable nanoparticles using low boiling point perfluorocarbons.

Authors:  Paul S Sheeran; Samantha H Luois; Lee B Mullin; Terry O Matsunaga; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Shearing DNA for genomic library construction.

Authors:  P N Hengen
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 13.807

7.  Dynamics and memory of heterochromatin in living cells.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Hathaway; Oliver Bell; Courtney Hodges; Erik L Miller; Dana S Neel; Gerald R Crabtree
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Decafluorobutane as a phase-change contrast agent for low-energy extravascular ultrasonic imaging.

Authors:  Paul S Sheeran; Vincent P Wong; Samantha Luois; Ryan J McFarland; William D Ross; Steven Feingold; Terry O Matsunaga; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  A subset of the histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferases Suv39h1, G9a, GLP, and SETDB1 participate in a multimeric complex.

Authors:  Lauriane Fritsch; Philippe Robin; Jacques R R Mathieu; Mouloud Souidi; Hélène Hinaux; Claire Rougeulle; Annick Harel-Bellan; Maya Ameyar-Zazoua; Slimane Ait-Si-Ali
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP): revisiting the efficacy of sample preparation, sonication, quantification of sheared DNA, and analysis via PCR.

Authors:  Pamela D Schoppee Bortz; Brian R Wamhoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Repressing Gene Transcription by Redirecting Cellular Machinery with Chemical Epigenetic Modifiers.

Authors:  Anna M Chiarella; Tiffany A Wang; Kyle V Butler; Jian Jin; Nathaniel A Hathaway
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Contribution of promoter DNA sequence to heterochromatin formation velocity and memory of gene repression in mouse embryo fibroblasts.

Authors:  Patricia A Vignaux; Celyn Bregio; Nathaniel A Hathaway
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Mutant p53 regulates Survivin to foster lung metastasis.

Authors:  Qiaosi Tang; Gizem Efe; Anna M Chiarella; Jessica Leung; Maoting Chen; Taiji Yamazoe; Zhenyi Su; Jason R Pitarresi; Jinyang Li; Mirazul Islam; Tatiana Karakasheva; Andres J Klein-Szanto; Samuel Pan; Jianhua Hu; Shoji Natsugoe; Wei Gu; Ben Z Stanger; Kwok-K Wong; J Alan Diehl; Adam J Bass; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Maureen E Murphy; Anil K Rustgi
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Genome-wide cancer-specific chromatin accessibility patterns derived from archival processed xenograft tumors.

Authors:  Shelsa S Marcel; Austin L Quimby; Melodie P Noel; Oscar C Jaimes; Marjan Mehrab-Mohseni; Suud A Ashur; Brian Velasco; James K Tsuruta; Sandeep K Kasoji; Charlene M Santos; Paul A Dayton; Joel S Parker; Ian J Davis; Samantha G Pattenden
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 9.438

5.  Discrete Adaptive Responses to MEK Inhibitor in Subpopulations of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel R Goulet; Joseph P Foster; Jon S Zawistowski; Samantha M Bevill; Mélodie P Noël; José F Olivares-Quintero; Noah Sciaky; Darshan Singh; Charlene Santos; Samantha G Pattenden; Ian J Davis; Gary L Johnson
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 5.852

6.  Ring finger protein 121 is a potent regulator of adeno-associated viral genome transcription.

Authors:  Victoria J Madigan; Julianne A Yuziuk; Anna M Chiarella; Tyne O Tyson; Rita M Meganck; Zachary C Elmore; Longping V Tse; Nathaniel A Hathaway; Aravind Asokan
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 6.823

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.