| Literature DB >> 29657836 |
Manila Khatri1, Sandeep Saxena1, Apjit Kaur1, Shashi K Bhasker1, Manoj Kumar2, Carsten H Meyer3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) plays a significant role in maintenance of integrity of retinal photoreceptors and choriocapillaries. RPE derives its blood supply through ophthalmic artery (OA) via choriocapillaries. RPE topographic alterations have been observed to be associated with severity of retinopathy. The present study was undertaken to assess the correlation between resistive index (RI) of the OA with RPE topographic alterations on Spectral-Domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), to our knowledge, it is for the first time.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetic retinopathy; Ophthalmic artery; Resistive index; Retinal pigment epithelium
Year: 2018 PMID: 29657836 PMCID: PMC5890348 DOI: 10.1186/s40942-018-0116-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Retina Vitreous ISSN: 2056-9920
Fig. 1Single layer retinal pigment epithelial maps showing retinal pigment epithelial topographic alterations in diabetic retinopathy alterations of this layer was graded into 3 categories: a Grade 0: No RPE alterations, b Grade 1: focal- alteration in predominantly up to 2 quadrants of map, c Grade 2: global- alteration in more than 2 quadrants of map
Fig. 2SD-OCT macular cube showing ellipsoid zone (EZ). a Grade 0: intact EZ, b Grade 1: focal disruption (localized, subfoveal EZ disruption), c Grade 2: global disruption (generalized EZ disruption throughout the macular cube)
Demographic, clinical, OCT, topographic and color doppler parameter levels (Mean ± SE) of four groups
| Variable | Controls | NO DR | NPDR | PDR | F/χ2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 60.23 ± 1.34 | 58.68 ± 1.54 | 58.28 ± 2.32 | 63.41 ± 1.99 | 1.64 | 0.183 |
|
| ||||||
| Female | 8 (36.4) | 9 (40.9) | 7 (28.0) | 5 (22.7) | 2.035 | 0.562 |
| Male | 14 (63.6) | 13 (59.1) | 18 (72.0) | 17 (77.3) | ||
| HbA1c (%) | 5.35 ± 0.11 | 7.91 ± 0.19 | 8.42 ± 0.28 | 8.88 ± 0.18 | 55.83 | < 0.001 |
| BCVA | 0.09 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.14 | 0.74 ± 0.07 | 1.19 ± 0.02 | 105.74 | < 0.001 |
| (log MAR) | (0.07–0.11) | (0.20–0.48) | (0.65–0.79) | (1.16–1.20) | ||
|
| ||||||
| Disruption absent | 22 (100.0) | 21 (95.5) | 14 (56.0) | 0 (0.0) | 60.59 | < 0.001 |
| Disruption present | 0 (0.0) | 1 (4.5) | 11 (44.0) | 22 (100.0) | ||
|
| ||||||
| Disruption absent | 22 (100.0) | 22 (100.0) | 20 (80.0) | 0 (0.0) | 71.83 | < 0.001 |
| Disruption present | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (20.0) | 22 (100.0) | ||
| RI-OA | 0.61 ± 0.01 | 0.79 ± 0.01 | 0.81 ± 0.02 | 1.02 ± 0.09 | 14.23 | < 0.001 |
NO DR no diabetic retinopathy, NPDR non proliferative diabetic retinopathy, PDR proliferative diabetic retinopathy, BCVA best corrected visual acuity, HBA1c glycosylated haemoglobin, EZ ellipsoid zone, RPE retinal pigment epithelium, RI-OA resistive index of ophthalmic artery
Fig. 3Box plot showing resistive index (RI) of ophthalmic artery (OA) of four groups
Fig. 4Scatter plot illustrating correlation between resistive index (RI) of ophthalmic artery (OA) and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) alterations
Fig. 5Scatter plot illustrating correlation between retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) alterations and ellipsoid zone (EZ) alterations