| Literature DB >> 29657823 |
Kevin J Badik1, Joshua P Jahner2, Joseph S Wilson3.
Abstract
Our goals were to explore the relationship between biogeography and the evolution of fire-adaptive syndromes in the genus Pinus. We used a previously published time-calibrated phylogeny and conducted ancestral trait reconstruction to estimate the likely timing of diversification in Pinus, and to determine when fire-adaptive syndromes evolved in the lineage. To explore trait conservation among fire syndromes and to investigate historical biogeography, we constructed ancestral state reconstructions using the program RASP and estimated the degree of conservatism for fire-adapted traits in the program BaTS. Our reconstructions suggest that the Bering land bridge, which connected North America and Asia, probably played a major role in early pine evolution. Our estimates indicated that fire-adaptive syndromes seem to have evolved more frequently in New World taxa and probably are related to the uplift of major North American mountain ranges. Our data suggest that certain geographically widespread adaptations to fire evolved repeatedly, possibly due to localized changes in climate and environment, rather than resulting from large dispersal events of pre-adapted individuals.Entities:
Keywords: Beringia; biogeography; evolution; fire; parallel evolution; trait reconstruction
Year: 2018 PMID: 29657823 PMCID: PMC5882747 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.172412
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Figure 1.The phylogenetic tree for subg. Strobus. Panel (a) represents the reconstructed ancestral locations; (b) represents the reconstructed ancestral fire syndromes. Solid coloured circles represent nodes where Bayesian posterior probability for ancestral location or fire syndrome was greater than 0.5. Panel (c) is a map of the regions that were used for the geographical distribution.
The estimates of trait conservatism for fire syndromes within genus Pinus from the BaTS analysis. Significance indicates a non-random distribution of the syndrome (i.e. a conserved niche). Significant values are indicated in italics. ‘MC’ is the maximum monophyletic clade.
| trait | observed MC | null MC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| avoider | 45 | 12 | 3.084 | < |
| evader | 12 | 3 | 1.352 | |
| resister | 39 | 4 | 2.778 | 0.172 |
| evader, endurer | 6 | 1 | 1.087 | 1.000 |
| evader, resister | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| resister, endurer | 6 | 1 | 1.094 | 1.000 |
| evader, resister, endurer | 4 | 1 | 1.024 | 1.000 |
Figure 2.The phylogenetic tree for subg. Pinus. Panel (a) represents the reconstructed ancestral locations; (b) represents the reconstructed ancestral fire syndromes. Solid coloured circles represent nodes where Bayesian posterior probability for ancestral location or fire syndrome was greater than 0.5.