Literature DB >> 20018720

General principles of attraction and competitive attraction as revealed by large-cage studies of moths responding to sex pheromone.

J R Miller1, P S McGhee, P Y Siegert, C G Adams, J Huang, M J Grieshop, L J Gut.   

Abstract

Knowledge of how insects are actually affected by sex pheromones deployed throughout a crop so as to disrupt mating has lacked a mechanistic framework sufficient for guiding optimization of this environmentally friendly pest-control tactic. Major hypotheses are competitive attraction, desensitization, and camouflage. Working with codling moths, Cydia pomonella, in field cages millions of times larger than laboratory test tubes and at substrate concentrations trillions of times less than those typical for enzymes, we nevertheless demonstrate that mating disruption sufficiently parallels enzyme (ligand) -substrate interactions so as to justify adoption of conceptual and analytical tools of biochemical kinetics. By doing so, we prove that commercial dispensers of codling moth pheromone first competitively attract and then deactivate males probably for the remainder of a night. No evidence was found for camouflage. We generated and now validate simple algebraic equations for attraction and competitive attraction that will guide optimization and broaden implementation of behavioral manipulations of pests. This analysis system also offers a unique approach to quantifying animal foraging behaviors and could find applications across the natural and social sciences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20018720      PMCID: PMC2806766          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0908453107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of mating disruption with pesticides for management of oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in North Carolina apple orchards.

Authors:  Orkun B Kovanci; Coby Schal; James F Walgenbach; George G Kennedy
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Differentiation of competitive vs. non-competitive mechanisms mediating disruption of moth sexual communication by point sources of sex pheromone (part I): Theory.

Authors:  J R Miller; L J Gut; F M de Lame; L L Stelinski
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Differentiation of competitive vs. non-competitive mechanisms mediating disruption of moth sexual communication by point sources of sex pheromone (part 2): Case studies.

Authors:  J R Miller; L J Gut; F M de Lame; L L Stelinski
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Orientational behaviors and EAG responses of male codling moth after exposure to synthetic sex pheromone from various dispensers.

Authors:  L L Stelinski; L J Gut; J R Miller
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 5.  Codling moth management and chemical ecology.

Authors:  Peter Witzgall; Lukasz Stelinski; Larry Gut; Don Thomson
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 19.686

6.  Analysis of ligand binding to receptors by competition kinetics. Application to muscarinic antagonists in rat brain cortex.

Authors:  G Schreiber; Y I Henis; M Sokolovsky
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1985-07-25       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Development and implementation of a reduced risk peach arthropod management program in New Jersey.

Authors:  Atanas Atanasso; Peter W Shearer; George Hamilton; Dean Polk
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.381

  7 in total
  14 in total

1.  Effect of pheromone dispenser density on timing and duration of approaches by peachtree borer.

Authors:  Luís A F Teixeira; Matthew J Grieshop; Larry J Gut
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Sex pheromones and their impact on pest management.

Authors:  Peter Witzgall; Philipp Kirsch; Alan Cork
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Neural coding merges sex and habitat chemosensory signals in an insect herbivore.

Authors:  Federica Trona; Gianfranco Anfora; Anna Balkenius; Marie Bengtsson; Marco Tasin; Alan Knight; Niklas Janz; Peter Witzgall; Rickard Ignell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Aerial application of pheromones for mating disruption of an invasive moth as a potential eradication tool.

Authors:  Eckehard G Brockerhoff; David M Suckling; Mark Kimberley; Brian Richardson; Graham Coker; Stefan Gous; Jessica L Kerr; David M Cowan; David R Lance; Tara Strand; Aijun Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Small cages with insect couples provide a simple method for a preliminary assessment of mating disruption.

Authors:  Françoise Briand; Patrick M Guerin; Pierre-Joseph Charmillot; Patrik Kehrli
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-03

6.  Potential benefits, limitations and target product-profiles of odor-baited mosquito traps for malaria control in Africa.

Authors:  Fredros O Okumu; Nicodem J Govella; Sarah J Moore; Nakul Chitnis; Gerry F Killeen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Female Moth Calling and Flight Behavior Are Altered Hours Following Pheromone Autodetection: Possible Implications for Practical Management with Mating Disruption.

Authors:  Lukasz Stelinski; Robert Holdcraft; Cesar Rodriguez-Saona
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.769

8.  The role of heterogeneity in contact timing and duration in network models of influenza spread in schools.

Authors:  Damon J A Toth; Molly Leecaster; Warren B P Pettey; Adi V Gundlapalli; Hongjiang Gao; Jeanette J Rainey; Amra Uzicanin; Matthew H Samore
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  The optimal sex pheromone release rate for trapping the codling moth Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in the field.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Jing Xu; Runzhi Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Taxis assays measure directional movement of mosquitoes to olfactory cues.

Authors:  Lena M Lorenz; Aidan Keane; Jason D Moore; Cristina J Munk; Laura Seeholzer; Antony Mseka; Emmanuel Simfukwe; Joseph Ligamba; Elizabeth L Turner; Lubandwa R Biswaro; Fredros O Okumu; Gerry F Killeen; Wolfgang R Mukabana; Sarah J Moore
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.