| Literature DB >> 29657640 |
Radosław Zawadzki1, Adam Garkowski1, Bożena Kubas2, Joanna Zajkowska3, Marcin Hładuński2, Dorota Jurgilewicz2, Urszula Łebkowska1.
Abstract
Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is caused by a virus that belongs to the Flaviviridae family and is transmitted by tick bites. The disease has a biphasic course. Diagnosis is based on laboratory examinations because of non-specific clinical features, which usually entails the detection of specific IgM antibodies in either blood or cerebrospinal fluid that appear in the second phase of the disease. Neurological symptoms, time course of the disease, and imaging findings are multifaceted. During the second phase of the disease, after the onset of neurological symptoms, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities are observed in a limited number of cases. However, imaging features may aid in predicting the prognosis of the disease.Entities:
Keywords: Encephalitis, Tick-Borne; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Neuroimaging; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Year: 2017 PMID: 29657640 PMCID: PMC5894064 DOI: 10.12659/PJR.903940
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pol J Radiol ISSN: 1733-134X
Figure 1Axial (A) and coronal (B) T2-weighted MRI images demonstrate bilateral hyperintense lesions within the lenticular nucleus, internal capsule, and thalamus (arrows). MRI examination was performed in TMS Diagnostyka, Medical University of Białystok Clinical Hospital.
Figure 2Axial T2-weighted MRI image (A) and FLAIR image (B) demonstrate bilateral hyperintense lesions within the basal ganglia and the thalamus (arrows). MRI examination was performed in TMS Diagnostyka, Medical University of Białystok Clinical Hospital.
Typical topographical mapping of pathological MRI and CT findings in patients with confirmed TBE.
| References | Number of cases | Sex/Age | Thalamus | Lesion location | Contrast enhancement | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lentiform nucleus | Caudate nucleus | Internal capsule | Corpus callosum | Putamen | Frontal lobe | Parietal lobe | Temporal lobe | Occipital lobe | Brainstem | Peduncles | Cerebellum | Spinal cord | Other | |||||
| Zajkowska et al. [ | 1 | M/38 | – | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Kaiser [ | 18 | N/A | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | + | – | – | – |
| Horger et al. [ | 13 | F/22 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | + |
| M/21 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | + | ||
| M/66 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| M/27 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | ||
| M/48 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | ||
| M/46 | + | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| M/66 | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | + | – | ||
| M/15 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| M/9- month- old | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| M/13 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | ||
| M/16 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | ||
| M/34 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | ||
| M/66 | – | – | – | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | ||
| Marjelund et al. [ | 3 | M/21 | + | – | – | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| F/12 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | – | – | + | ||
| F/24 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Waldvogel et al. [ | 1 | F/5 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + |
| Lorenzl et al. [ | 1 | F/38 | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – |
| Valdueza et al. [ | 1 | M/32 | + | – | + | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | + | + |
| Pfister et al. [ | 1 | NA/55 | + | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Alkadhi and Kollias [ | 1 | F/52 | + | – | + | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + |
| Vollmann et al. [ | 1 | M/42 | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Stich et al. [ | 1 | M/43 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | – |
| Beer et al. [ | 1 | M/44 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | – |
| Bender et al. [ | 1 | M/29 | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | + | – | + |
| Marjelund et al. [ | 1 | M/48 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | + |
| Pfefferkorn et al. [ | 1 | M/50 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | + |
| Schmolck et al. [ | 3 | N/A | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – |
| Iff et al. [ | 1 | F/6- week- old | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | + |
| Jones et al. [ | 1 | M/17- day- old | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – |
NA – not available.