Aim: The aim of the present study was to establish a standard protocol for ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRH-a) long protocol using recombinant-follicle stimulating hormone (rec-FSH) preparations for assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. Methods: In 86 patients who underwent ovarian stimulation with GnRH-a long protocol for ART treatment, 53 were stimulated by rec-FSH preparations (rec-FSH group) and the others were stimulated by urinary-hMG (u-hMG group) preparations. The subjects were randomly assigned to either of these preparations. Hormonal profiles, total doses of gonadotropins, duration of stimulation and ART results were compared in both groups. Results: The duration of stimulation was similar in both groups (9.2 ± 0.3 days and 9.2 ± 0.2 days, respectively). The total doses of gonadotropin in the rec-FSH group (1505.3 ± 29.2 IU) was significantly lower than those in the u-hMG group (2130.3 ± 54.6 IU, P < 0.0001). The FSH and LH values on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration in the rec-FSH group were significantly lower than those in the u-hMG group. Pregnancy rates were 31.3% in the rec-FSH group and 33.3% in the u-hMG group, respectively. Conclusions: The present study showed that rec-FSH preparations were more potent than conventional u-hMG preparations and the protocol of the present study with rec-FSH was a new ovarian stimulation protocol with GnRH-a long protocol. (Reprod Med Biol 2007; 6: 27-32).
RCT Entities:
Aim: The aim of the present study was to establish a standard protocol for ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRH-a) long protocol using recombinant-follicle stimulating hormone (rec-FSH) preparations for assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. Methods: In 86 patients who underwent ovarian stimulation with GnRH-a long protocol for ART treatment, 53 were stimulated by rec-FSH preparations (rec-FSH group) and the others were stimulated by urinary-hMG (u-hMG group) preparations. The subjects were randomly assigned to either of these preparations. Hormonal profiles, total doses of gonadotropins, duration of stimulation and ART results were compared in both groups. Results: The duration of stimulation was similar in both groups (9.2 ± 0.3 days and 9.2 ± 0.2 days, respectively). The total doses of gonadotropin in the rec-FSH group (1505.3 ± 29.2 IU) was significantly lower than those in the u-hMG group (2130.3 ± 54.6 IU, P < 0.0001). The FSH and LH values on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration in the rec-FSH group were significantly lower than those in the u-hMG group. Pregnancy rates were 31.3% in the rec-FSH group and 33.3% in the u-hMG group, respectively. Conclusions: The present study showed that rec-FSH preparations were more potent than conventional u-hMG preparations and the protocol of the present study with rec-FSH was a new ovarian stimulation protocol with GnRH-a long protocol. (Reprod Med Biol 2007; 6: 27-32).
Authors: B Mannaerts; R de Leeuw; J Geelen; A Van Ravestein; P Van Wezenbeek; A Schuurs; H Kloosterboer Journal: Endocrinology Date: 1991-11 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: B Hedon; H J Out; J N Hugues; B Camier; J Cohen; P Lopes; J R Zorn; B van der Heijden; H J Coelingh Bennink Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 1995-12 Impact factor: 6.918