Literature DB >> 12215327

Efficacy and safety of highly purified menotropin versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: a randomized, comparative trial.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG) is as efficient and safe as recombinant FSH in females undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment cycles.
DESIGN: Multinational, open label, randomized, parallel group, comparative phase III trial.
SETTING: In 22 centers across six countries; Belgium (1 center), Germany (6 centers), Israel (6 centers), The Netherlands (2 centers), Switzerland (1 center) and the United Kingdom (6 centers). PATIENT(S): A total of 781 women were enrolled between May 1999 and November 2000. INTERVENTION(S): In the all-patients-treated population, 373 patients received HP-hMG and 354 received recombinant FSH. A long protocol GnRH agonist regimen was used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary end point was ongoing pregnancy rate following one IVF/ICSI treatment cycle. Safety was assessed as a secondary end point. RESULT(S): Ongoing pregnancy rates 10 weeks after ovum pickup in the per-protocol population were 25% (n = 85/344) in the HP-hMG group and 22% (n = 71/317) in the recombinant FSH group. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, miscarriage, adverse events, and injection site reactions (tolerability) were similar in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION(S): We found HP-hMG to be as effective as recombinant FSH in terms of ongoing clinical pregnancy. Both treatments have a similar safety/tolerability profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12215327     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03250-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  14 in total

1.  Recombinant-follicle stimulating hormone is more effective than urinary human menopausal gonadotropin in ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted reproductive technology treatment.

Authors:  Koji Nakagawa; Shirei Ohgi; Rieko Kojima; Kana Sugawara; Takashi Horikawa; Megumu Ito; Minoaru Irahara; Hidekazu Saito
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2007-02-16

2.  Recombinant follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in fertility treatment.

Authors:  Ahmed Gibreel; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2010-02-04

Review 3.  Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone produces more oocytes with a lower total dose per cycle in assisted reproductive technologies compared with highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Lehert; Joan C Schertz; Diego Ezcurra
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  Subcutaneously administered Menopur, a new highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin, causes significantly fewer injection site reactions than Repronex in subjects undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  William R Keye; Bobby Webster; Richard Dickey; Stephen Somkuti; Jack Crain; M Joseph Scobey
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  "In vitro" Effect of Different Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Preparations on Sertoli Cells: Toward a Personalized Treatment for Male Infertility.

Authors:  Iva Arato; Giuseppe Grande; Ferran Barrachina; Catia Bellucci; Cinzia Lilli; Meritxell Jodar; Maria Chiara Aglietti; Francesca Mancini; Federica Vincenzoni; Alfredo Pontecorvi; Riccardo Calafiore; Rafael Oliva; Giovanni Luca; Francesca Mancuso; Domenico Milardi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Comparative effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa) versus highly purified urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG HP) in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments: a non-interventional study in Germany.

Authors:  Klaus F Bühler; Robert Fischer; Patrice Verpillat; Arthur Allignol; Sandra Guedes; Emmanuelle Boutmy; Wilma Bilger; Emilia Richter; Thomas D'Hooghe
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Economic evaluation of highly purified human menotropin or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone for controlled ovarian stimulation in high-responder patients: analysis of the Menopur in Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Antagonist Single Embryo Transfer-High Responder (MEGASET-HR) trial.

Authors:  Jared C Robins; Andrew F Khair; Eric A Widra; Michael M Alper; Winnie W Nelson; Eric D Foster; Anshul Sinha; Masakazu Ando; Patrick W Heiser; Gaurang S Daftary
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-11-10

8.  Economic evaluation of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm-injection cycles in Sweden.

Authors:  Jaro Wex; Ahmed M Abou-Setta
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-08-09

9.  Safety and efficacy of Ovaleap® (recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone) for up to 3 cycles in infertile women using assisted reproductive technology: a phase 3 open-label follow-up to Main Study.

Authors:  Thomas Strowitzki; Waldemar Kuczynski; Arnd Mueller; Peter Bias
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Randomized, active-controlled, comparative phase 3 efficacy and safety equivalence trial of Ovaleap® (recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone) in infertile women using assisted reproduction technology (ART).

Authors:  Thomas Strowitzki; Waldemar Kuczynski; Arnd Mueller; Peter Bias
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.