Literature DB >> 29656703

The ethics of concurrent care for children: A social justice perspective.

Kim Mooney-Doyle1, Jessica Keim-Malpass2, Lisa C Lindley3.   

Abstract

Recent estimates indicate that over 40,000 children die annually in the United States and a majority have life-limiting conditions. Children at end of life require extensive healthcare resources, including multiple hospital readmissions and emergency room visits. Yet, many children still suffer from symptoms at end of life-including fatigue, pain, dyspnea, and anxiety-with less than 10% of these children utilizing hospice care services. A critical barrier to pediatric hospice use was the original federal regulations associated with the hospice care that required a diagnosis of 6 months to live and the discontinuation of all curative treatments. The Concurrent Care Provision of the United States' Affordable Care Act eliminated the need to forgo curative therapies in order to enroll in hospice for children in Medicaid or Children's Health Insurance Program. Concurrent care for children can help mitigate the tension families experience in choosing between essential forms of care, as well as contribute to improved end-of-life outcomes for the child and possibly bereavement outcomes for the family. Understanding concurrent care for children from a social justice perspective has important advocacy and research implications for hospice and palliative care clinicians providing care for children and their families. We apply Powers and Faden's theory of social justice "as the moral foundation of public health and health policy" to the provision of concurrent care to children near end of life and families in the United States. The goals of applying this theory are to explore additional insights and perspectives into concurrent care policy may provide and to assess the usefulness of this theory when applied to end-of-life health policy. We argue that concurrent care policy is socially just since it has potential to promote well-being in vulnerable children and families and can limit the inequity children at end-of-life experience in access to high-quality hospice care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  End-of-life issues; ethics and children in care; neonatal care; palliative care; pediatric practice; policy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29656703     DOI: 10.1177/0969733018765308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Ethics        ISSN: 0969-7330            Impact factor:   2.874


  5 in total

Review 1.  Using ways of knowing in nursing to develop educational strategies that support knowledge mobilization.

Authors:  Amelia Swift; Alison Twycross
Journal:  Paediatr Neonatal Pain       Date:  2020-09-07

2.  A Comparison of Young Adults With and Without Cancer in Concurrent Hospice Care: Implications for Transitioning to Adult Health Care.

Authors:  Kim Mooney-Doyle; Jessica Keim-Malpass; Radion Svynarenko; Lisa C Lindley
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 2.223

3.  Social Determinants of Comfort: A New Term for End-of-Life Care.

Authors:  Annette Mendola; Wendy C Naumann; Kim Mooney-Doyle; Lisa C Lindley
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  Differences in characteristics of children with cancer who receive standard versus concurrent hospice care.

Authors:  Radion Svynarenko; Jennifer W Mack; Lisa C Lindley
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 5.  Pediatric Concurrent Hospice Care: A Scoping Review and Directions for Future Nursing Research.

Authors:  Lisa C Lindley; Jessica Keim-Malpass; Radion Svynarenko; Melanie J Cozad; Jennifer W Mack; Pamela S Hinds
Journal:  J Hosp Palliat Nurs       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.131

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.