Literature DB >> 29655707

Temporomandibular condylar morphology in diverse maxillary-mandibular skeletal patterns: A 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study.

Qiaoling Ma, Panthi Bimal, Li Mei, Simon Olliver, Mauro Farella, Huang Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated the morphology and symmetry of the temporomandibular joint in participants with normodivergent and hyperdivergent skeletal class I, II, and III patterns.
METHODS: A total of 80 participants were divided into 4 groups on the basis of their sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns. Cone-beam computed tomographic images were used to evaluate the condyle-fossa relationship and the morphology and symmetry of the mandibular condyle. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc tests were used to compare the mean values among the different groups.
RESULTS: Participants with class II hyperdivergent patterns had the smallest anteroposterior (mean [standard deviation {SD}], 4.4 [1.6] millimeters) and mediolateral (10.5 [3.0] mm) condylar process widths among all 4 groups. The mean (SD) axial condylar angle was flatter in patients with class III hyperdivergent patterns (19.8° [5.1°]) compared with the other groups. The mean (SD) anteroposterior differences of the condylar processes (2.9 [1.4] mm) in patients with class III hyperdivergent patterns were the greatest in all 4 groups.
CONCLUSION: Participants in the group with class II hyperdivergent patterns have a smaller and narrower condyle compared with the other groups measured. Asymmetry was found among all groups, with participants with skeletal class III patterns having the most asymmetry. The most common condylar morphology in all groups examined was convex. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: These results support the concept that morphology and symmetry of the temporomandibular joint varies in different skeletal patterns, presumably as an adaptive response to functional demands.
Copyright © 2018 American Dental Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone-beam computed tomography; condylar morphology; symmetry; temporomandibular joint

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29655707     DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  4 in total

1.  Morphometric evaluation of the temporomandibular joint on cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Elif Ayyıldız; Mustafa Orhan; İlhan Bahşi; Eda Didem Yalçin
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  [Cone-beam CT evaluation of temporomandibular joint in skeletal class Ⅱ female adolescents with different vertical patterns].

Authors:  J Zhou; Y Liu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-12-29

3.  Age-related variations in position and morphology of the temporomandibular joint in individuals with anterior openbite and crossbite: a multi-cross-sectional comparative study.

Authors:  Yanxi Chen; Jingxi Wang; Ying Li; Lingfeng Li; Nan Luo; Yan Wu; Hongwei Dai; Jianping Zhou
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  Comprehensive 3D analysis of condylar morphology in adults with different skeletal patterns - a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Petra Santander; Anja Quast; Carolin Olbrisch; Marius Rose; Norman Moser; Henning Schliephake; Philipp Meyer-Marcotty
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.151

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.