Literature DB >> 33221971

Morphometric evaluation of the temporomandibular joint on cone-beam computed tomography.

Elif Ayyıldız1, Mustafa Orhan1, İlhan Bahşi2, Eda Didem Yalçin3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pathologies with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) provides essential information about the bone structures of the TMJ. It is important to know the normal reference range when defining these pathologies. The aim of this study is to examine the morphometric and morphologic analyses of the bone structures of TMJ on the CBCT images in detail according to age, gender, and joint side.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 35 parameters related to the condylar process, articular tubercle, mandibular fossa, ramus of mandible, and joint space were examined on the CBCT images. These parameters were compared with the joint sides and gender, and correlated with age.
RESULTS: Thirty-five parameters were evaluated. A statistically significant difference was found between genders in 22 parameters and joint sides in 6 parameters. When the correlation of parameters with age was examined; it was found that there was a very weak positive relationship in nine parameters, a weak positive relationship in one parameter, and a very weak relationship in the negative direction in two parameters.
CONCLUSION: In this study, the condylar process, articular tubercle, mandibular fossa, ramus of mandible, and joint spaces, which are usually examined separately in the literature, were examined, and the normal reference range was determined for all these parameters. We think that these normal reference ranges will be useful for researchers interested in TMJ pathologies.

Keywords:  Cone-beam computed tomography; Morphometry; Temporomandibular joint

Year:  2020        PMID: 33221971     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-020-02617-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  28 in total

1.  Relationship between sex, age, and the minimum thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa in normal temporomandibular joints.

Authors:  Kazuya Honda; Shoji Kawashima; Masahiro Kashima; Kunihiko Sawada; Koji Shinoda; Masashi Sugisaki
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.414

2.  Anatomy of the temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  X Alomar; J Medrano; J Cabratosa; J A Clavero; M Lorente; I Serra; J M Monill; A Salvador
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 3.  Imaging of the temporomandibular joint: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology.

Authors:  S L Brooks; J W Brand; S J Gibbs; L Hollender; A G Lurie; K A Omnell; P L Westesson; S C White
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1997-05

4.  Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Condylar Symmetry and Condyle-Fossa Relationship of the Temporomandibular Joint in Subjects with Normal Occlusion and Malocclusion: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Vivek Reddy Ganugapanta; Swaroopa Rani Ponnada; Kranthi Praveen Raju Gaddam; Kiran Perumalla; Imran Khan; Naqeed Abdul Mohammed
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

5.  Relationship between the thickness of the roof of glenoid fossa, condyle morphology and remaining teeth in asymptomatic European patients based on cone beam CT data sets.

Authors:  K Ejima; D Schulze; A Stippig; K Matsumoto; D Rottke; K Honda
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Biometry of the temporomandibular joint using computerized tomography.

Authors:  Isabelle Dupuy-Bonafé; Philippe Otal; Sylvie Montal; Alain Bonafé; Igor L Maldonado
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Association between the prominence of the articular eminence and displaced TMJ disks.

Authors:  M B Hall; C C Gibbs; A G Sclar
Journal:  Cranio       Date:  1985 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 2.020

8.  Tomographic assessment of temporomandibular joints in patients with malocclusion.

Authors:  J T Cohlmia; J Ghosh; P K Sinha; R S Nanda; G F Currier
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Assessment of condyle and glenoid fossa morphology using CBCT in South-East Asians.

Authors:  May Al-koshab; Phrabhakaran Nambiar; Jacob John
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Spatial analysis of condyle position according to sagittal skeletal relationship, assessed by cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Jessica M Arieta-Miranda; Manuel Silva-Valencia; Carlos Flores-Mir; Ney A Paredes-Sampen; Luis E Arriola-Guillen
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.750

View more
  1 in total

1.  Radiologic evaluation of the fossa navicularis: incidence, morphometric features, and clinical implications.

Authors:  Saliha Seda Adanir; İlhan Bahşi; Mustafa Orhan; Piraye Kervancioğlu; Orhan Beger; Eda Didem Yalçin
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 1.246

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.