T S Weber-Spickschen1,2, S Bischoff3, H Horstmann3, M Winkelmann4, P Mommsen4, M Panzica4, C Krettek4, A Kerling3. 1. Sportmedizinisches Institut, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. weber-spickschen.sanjay@mh-hannover.de. 2. Unfallchirurgische Klinik, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. weber-spickschen.sanjay@mh-hannover.de. 3. Sportmedizinisches Institut, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. 4. Unfallchirurgische Klinik, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The warm-up and injury prevention program FIFA 11+ was developed to reduce injuries in recreational and amateur level football. Despite systematic education it is uncertain what amount of knowledge is passed down to the lower recreational level football players and what exercises are implemented in the daily routine. This study presents the summarized experiences of German coaches about the implementation of exercises on the football pitch. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study 142 coaches who participated in 1 (of 5) of the 2‑day courses between 2013 and 2017 were sent a questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of 24 questions, which were developed by the football union of Lower Saxony. Incomplete questionnaires were excluded from the study. RESULTS: A total of 121 questionnaires could be analyzed, which is a response rate of 85.2%. The mean time period between the 2‑day training and answering the questionnaire was 29 months. Of the participating coaches 82.6% indicated that they use the program regularly (22% of the coaches use it twice a week or more frequently, 34% use it only once a week) and 6% of the coaches use additional programs to prevent injuries. A total of 86% of the participants believed in a reduction in the incidence of injuries induced by the FIFA 11+ concept, 89% of the participants rated the FIFA 11+ program as good ors very good, 91% rated the teaching concept as good or very good and 94% of the participants would recommend the 2‑day advanced course to others. DISCUSSION: The prevention program as well as the advanced training concept were evaluated very positively. Most coaches use the program regularly. Nevertheless, many coaches use the FIFA 11+ exercises less than the recommended twice a week. Most coaches praised the good structure of the program, but also wished for the possibility of variations. CONCLUSION: The prevention program FIFA 11+ is seen by coaches in recreational and amateur football as an effective tool to prevent injury. Implementation on the football pitch is regular but not as frequent as the evidence-based recommendations in the training concept.
BACKGROUND: The warm-up and injury prevention program FIFA 11+ was developed to reduce injuries in recreational and amateur level football. Despite systematic education it is uncertain what amount of knowledge is passed down to the lower recreational level football players and what exercises are implemented in the daily routine. This study presents the summarized experiences of German coaches about the implementation of exercises on the football pitch. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study 142 coaches who participated in 1 (of 5) of the 2‑day courses between 2013 and 2017 were sent a questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of 24 questions, which were developed by the football union of Lower Saxony. Incomplete questionnaires were excluded from the study. RESULTS: A total of 121 questionnaires could be analyzed, which is a response rate of 85.2%. The mean time period between the 2‑day training and answering the questionnaire was 29 months. Of the participating coaches 82.6% indicated that they use the program regularly (22% of the coaches use it twice a week or more frequently, 34% use it only once a week) and 6% of the coaches use additional programs to prevent injuries. A total of 86% of the participants believed in a reduction in the incidence of injuries induced by the FIFA 11+ concept, 89% of the participants rated the FIFA 11+ program as good ors very good, 91% rated the teaching concept as good or very good and 94% of the participants would recommend the 2‑day advanced course to others. DISCUSSION: The prevention program as well as the advanced training concept were evaluated very positively. Most coaches use the program regularly. Nevertheless, many coaches use the FIFA 11+ exercises less than the recommended twice a week. Most coaches praised the good structure of the program, but also wished for the possibility of variations. CONCLUSION: The prevention program FIFA 11+ is seen by coaches in recreational and amateur football as an effective tool to prevent injury. Implementation on the football pitch is regular but not as frequent as the evidence-based recommendations in the training concept.
Entities:
Keywords:
Amateur football; FIFA 11+; Prevention; Sports injury; Warm up
Authors: Astrid Junge; Markus Lamprecht; Hanspeter Stamm; Hansruedi Hasler; Mario Bizzini; Markus Tschopp; Harald Reuter; Heinz Wyss; Chris Chilvers; Jiri Dvorak Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2010-10-17 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Thiago Jambo Alves Lopes; Milena Simic; Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Timothy E Hewett; Evangelos Pappas Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Alex Donaldson; Aisling Callaghan; Mario Bizzini; Andrew Jowett; Patrick Keyzer; Matthew Nicholson Journal: Inj Prev Date: 2018-01-20 Impact factor: 2.399
Authors: Holly Silvers-Granelli; Bert Mandelbaum; Ola Adeniji; Stephanie Insler; Mario Bizzini; Ryan Pohlig; Astrid Junge; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Jiri Dvorak Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 6.202