Literature DB >> 29654358

Minimizing Post-operative Complications of Groin Dissection Using Modified Skin Bridge Technique: A Single-Centre Descriptive Study Showing Post-operative and Early Oncological Outcomes.

Mukur Dipi Ray1, Ashish Jakhetiya2, Sunil Kumar1, Ashutosh Mishra1, Seema Singh1, Nootan Kumar Shukla1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Historically, groin dissections are associated with high morbidity. Various modifications have been described in the literature with inconsistent outcomes. The aim of this paper is to highlight modified skin bridge technique to minimize all post-operative complications of groin dissection without compromising early oncological outcomes.
METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study of the computerized cancer database was performed to retrieve details of all the cancer patients who had undergone groin dissections during January 2012 to September 2016. Data pertaining to clinical profile including demographics, clinical and histopathological details, treatment profile, procedure-related morbidity and relapse patterns were extracted and analysed.
RESULTS: A total of 75 patients underwent 105 groin dissections during this period. Out of 105 groin dissections, 43 were inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) and 62 were combined ilio-inguinal lymph node dissection (IILND). The most common diagnosis was carcinoma penis (25%) followed by malignant melanoma (14.6%) and squamous cell carcinoma (13.33%) of lower extremities. Overall, the most common complications were seroma (14.28%) and skin edge necrosis (7.61%) followed by surgical site infection (4.76%). After a median follow-up of 17.64 months (IQR 5-61.53), a total of 18 patients (24%) developed recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Groin dissection still remains an important diagnostic as well as therapeutic procedure justifying its potential of morbidity. Modified skin bridge technique is a very effective method to minimize all post-operative complications with optimal early oncological outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29654358     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4604-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  18 in total

Review 1.  Groin dissection.

Authors:  J Spratt
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 2.  Endoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: the developing of a novel technique.

Authors:  René Sotelo; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Rafael Clavijo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Controversies in ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  P K Hegarty; C P Dinney; C A Pettaway
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Radical ilio-inguinal node dissection: the skin bridge technique. A new procedure.

Authors:  E E Fraley; H C Hutchens
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Deep Vein Thrombosis in Indian Cancer Patients Undergoing Major Thoracic and Abdomino-Pelvic Surgery.

Authors:  Ashish Jakhetiya; Nootan Kumar Shukla; S V Suryanarayana Deo; Pankaj Kumar Garg; Sanjay Thulkar
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-06-06

6.  Morbidity following groin dissection for penile carcinoma.

Authors:  R Ravi
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1993-12

7.  Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: a new minimally invasive procedure for radical management of inguinal nodes in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Marcos Tobias-Machado; Alessandro Tavares; Antônio Augusto Ornellas; Wilson Rica Molina; Roberto Vaz Juliano; Eric Roger Wroclawski
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Association between lymph node density and disease specific survival in patients with penile cancer.

Authors:  Robert S Svatek; Mark Munsell; Jordan M Kincaid; Paul Hegarty; Joel W Slaton; J Erik Busby; Kris E Gaston; Philippe E Spiess; Lance C Pagliaro; Pheroze Tamboli; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Operative morbidity associated with groin dissections.

Authors:  Hitoshi Tonouchi; Yukinari Ohmori; Minako Kobayashi; Naomi Konishi; Kouji Tanaka; Yasuhiko Mohri; Hitoshi Mizutani; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 10.  Modified skin bridge technique for ilio-inguinal lymph node dissection: A forgotten technique revisited.

Authors:  Mukur Dipi Ray; Pankaj K Garg; Ashish Jakhetiya; Sunil Kumar; Durgatosh Pandey
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2016-09-26
View more
  2 in total

1.  Effectiveness and Prognosis: Drainage Skin-Bridge Sparing Surgery Combined with Fistulotomy versus Fistulotomy Only in the Treatment of Anal Fistula.

Authors:  Xiao Wang; Chunliang Wang; Ruihua Qi
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 2.682

2.  Comparison of different surgical methods and strategies for inguinal lymph node dissection in patients with penile cancer.

Authors:  Yanxiang Shao; Xu Hu; Shangqing Ren; Duwu Liao; Zhen Yang; Yang Liu; Thongher Lia; Kan Wu; Sanchao Xiong; Weixiao Yang; Shuyang Feng; Yaohui Wang; Xiang Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.