Literature DB >> 19837433

Association between lymph node density and disease specific survival in patients with penile cancer.

Robert S Svatek1, Mark Munsell, Jordan M Kincaid, Paul Hegarty, Joel W Slaton, J Erik Busby, Kris E Gaston, Philippe E Spiess, Lance C Pagliaro, Pheroze Tamboli, Curtis A Pettaway.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the value of lymph node density for predicting disease specific survival after lymphadenectomy for penile cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively in 75 and prospectively in 88 consecutive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis treated at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1979 and 2007. We identified 45 patients with penile cancer and nodal metastasis who underwent lymphadenectomy with curative intent. Lymph node density was analyzed as a categorical variable by grouping patients into 2 or 3 categories based on equal percents. We explored the prognostic value of lymph node density for predicting disease specific survival in this cohort.
RESULTS: Median followup was 23.7 months in all patients. By the time of analysis 22 patients had died, including 18 (82%) of penile cancer and 4 (18%) of other causes. Median lymph node density in patients alive or dead of other causes was 3.4% (IQR 2.9-5.9) compared to 43.3% (IQR 15.6-80) in those dead of disease (p <0.001). Median lymph node density in all patients was 6.7%. Estimated 5-year disease specific survival in patients with lymph node density 6.7% or less was significantly better than that in patients with lymph node density greater than 6.7% (91.2%, 95% CI 53.9-98.8 vs 23.3%, 95% CI 7.0-45.1, p <0.001). In models comparing lymph node density to known prognostic features lymph node density remained statistically significant, while the other factors were no longer statistically associated with disease specific survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node density proved to be a significantly better prognosticator of disease specific survival than the current TNM nodal staging system in patients with penile cancer and nodal involvement. Further independent validation is required to determine the clinical usefulness of lymph node density in this patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19837433     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  15 in total

1.  Minimizing Post-operative Complications of Groin Dissection Using Modified Skin Bridge Technique: A Single-Centre Descriptive Study Showing Post-operative and Early Oncological Outcomes.

Authors:  Mukur Dipi Ray; Ashish Jakhetiya; Sunil Kumar; Ashutosh Mishra; Seema Singh; Nootan Kumar Shukla
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Penile cancer: current therapy and future directions.

Authors:  G Sonpavde; L C Pagliaro; C Buonerba; T B Dorff; R J Lee; G Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Extent of pelvic lymph node dissection in penile cancer may impact survival.

Authors:  Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Pranav Sharma; Rosa Djajadiningrat; Mario Catanzaro; Ding-Wei Ye; Yao Zhu; Nicola Nicolai; Simon Horenblas; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Lymph node metastases and prognosis in penile cancer.

Authors:  Yao Zhu; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Validation of the prognostic value of lymph node ratio in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma: a population-based study.

Authors:  Yao Zhu; Cheng-Yuan Gu; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  The impact of lymph node density on survival of cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  S Polterauer; L Hefler; V Seebacher; J Rahhal; C Tempfer; R Horvat; A Reinthaller; C Grimm
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Modification of N staging systems for penile cancer: a more precise prediction of prognosis.

Authors:  Z-S Li; K Yao; P Chen; B Wang; J-P Chen; Q-W Mi; Y-H Li; Z-W Liu; Z-K Qin; F-J Zhou; H Han
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  The importance of extranodal extension in penile cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhi-Ling Zhang; Chun-Ping Yu; Zhuo-Wei Liu; Liliya Velet; Yong-Hong Li; Li-Juan Jiang; Fang-Jian Zhou
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Development of a New Classification Method for Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on Lymph Node Density and Standard Pathological Risk Factors: The ND Staging System.

Authors:  Zai-Shang Li; Kai Yao; Peng Chen; Bin Wang; Qi-Wu Mi; Jie-Ping Chen; Yong-Hong Li; Chuang-Zhong Deng; Zhuo-Wei Liu; Zi-Ke Qin; Fang-Jian Zhou; Hui Han
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count and Lymph Node Density on Overall Survival of Penile Cancer.

Authors:  Pan Gao; Tianle Zhu; Jingjing Gao; Hu Li; Xi Liu; Xiansheng Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.