Anthonin Reilhac1,2, Inés Merida2, Zacharie Irace2, Mary C Stephenson3, Ashley A Weekes3, Christopher Chen4,5, John J Totman3, David W Townsend3, Hadi Fayad6,7, Nicolas Costes2. 1. Clinical Imaging Research Centre, A*STAR-NUS, Singapore anthonin_reilhac@circ.a-star.edu.sg. 2. CERMEP-Imagerie du Vivant, Lyon, France. 3. Clinical Imaging Research Centre, A*STAR-NUS, Singapore. 4. Department of Pharmacology, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 5. Memory Aging and Cognition Centre, National University Health System, Singapore. 6. OHS, PET/CT, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar; and. 7. LaTIM, INSERM UMR 1101, Brest, France.
Abstract
Head motion occurring during brain PET studies leads to image blurring and to bias in measured local quantities. The objective of this work was to implement a correction method for PET data acquired with the mMR synchronous PET/MR scanner. Methods: A list-mode-based motion-correction approach has been designed. The developed rebinner chronologically reads the recorded events from the Siemens list-mode file, applies the estimated geometric transformations, and frames the detected counts into sinograms. The rigid-body motion parameters were estimated from an initial dynamic reconstruction of the PET data. We then optimized the correction for 11C-Pittsburgh compound B (11C-PIB) scans using simulated and actual data with well-controlled motion. Results: An efficient list-mode-based motion correction approach has been implemented, fully optimized, and validated using simulated and actual PET data. The average spatial resolution loss induced by inaccuracies in motion parameter estimates and by the rebinning process was estimated to correspond to a 1-mm increase in full width at half maximum with motion parameters estimated directly from the PET data with a temporal frequency of 20 s. The results show that the rebinner can be safely applied to the 11C-PIB scans, allowing almost complete removal of motion-induced artifacts. The application of the correction method to a large cohort of 11C-PIB scans led to the following observations: first, that more than 21% of the scans were affected by motion greater than 10 mm (39% for subjects with Mini-Mental State Examination scores below 20), and second, that the correction led to quantitative changes in Alzheimer-specific cortical regions of up to 30%. Conclusion: The rebinner allows accurate motion correction at a cost of minimal resolution reduction. Application of the correction to a large cohort of 11C-PIB scans confirmed the necessity of systematically correcting for motion to obtain quantitative results.
Head motion occurring during brain PET studies leads to image blurring and to bias in measured local quantities. The objective of this work was to implement a correction method for PET data acquired with the mMR synchronous PET/MR scanner. Methods: A list-mode-based motion-correction approach has been designed. The developed rebinner chronologically reads the recorded events from the Siemens list-mode file, applies the estimated geometric transformations, and frames the detected counts into sinograms. The rigid-body motion parameters were estimated from an initial dynamic reconstruction of the PET data. We then optimized the correction for 11C-Pittsburgh compound B (11C-PIB) scans using simulated and actual data with well-controlled motion. Results: An efficient list-mode-based motion correction approach has been implemented, fully optimized, and validated using simulated and actual PET data. The average spatial resolution loss induced by inaccuracies in motion parameter estimates and by the rebinning process was estimated to correspond to a 1-mm increase in full width at half maximum with motion parameters estimated directly from the PET data with a temporal frequency of 20 s. The results show that the rebinner can be safely applied to the 11C-PIB scans, allowing almost complete removal of motion-induced artifacts. The application of the correction method to a large cohort of 11C-PIB scans led to the following observations: first, that more than 21% of the scans were affected by motion greater than 10 mm (39% for subjects with Mini-Mental State Examination scores below 20), and second, that the correction led to quantitative changes in Alzheimer-specific cortical regions of up to 30%. Conclusion: The rebinner allows accurate motion correction at a cost of minimal resolution reduction. Application of the correction to a large cohort of 11C-PIB scans confirmed the necessity of systematically correcting for motion to obtain quantitative results.
Authors: Ying-Hwey Nai; Yee-Hsin Tay; Tomotaka Tanaka; Christopher P Chen; Edward G Robins; Anthonin Reilhac Journal: Neuroinformatics Date: 2022-05-27
Authors: Tomotaka Tanaka; Mary C Stephenson; Ying-Hwey Nai; Damian Khor; Francis N Saridin; Saima Hilal; Steven Villaraza; Bibek Gyanwali; Masafumi Ihara; Henri Vrooman; Ashley A Weekes; John J Totman; Edward G Robins; Christopher P Chen; Anthonin Reilhac Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Pawel J Markiewicz; Julian C Matthews; John Ashburner; David M Cash; David L Thomas; Enrico De Vita; Anna Barnes; M Jorge Cardoso; Marc Modat; Richard Brown; Kris Thielemans; Casper da Costa-Luis; Isadora Lopes Alves; Juan Domingo Gispert; Mark E Schmidt; Paul Marsden; Alexander Hammers; Sebastien Ourselin; Frederik Barkhof Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Yihuan Lu; Mika Naganawa; Takuya Toyonaga; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Kathryn Fontaine; Silin Ren; Enette Mae Revilla; Tim Mulnix; Richard E Carson Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Michael A Levine; Joseph B Mandeville; Finnegan Calabro; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Daniel B Chonde; Kevin T Chen; Inki Hong; Julie C Price; Beatriz Luna; Ciprian Catana Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 6.960
Authors: Haohui Liu; Ying-Hwey Nai; Francis Saridin; Tomotaka Tanaka; Jim O' Doherty; Saima Hilal; Bibek Gyanwali; Christopher P Chen; Edward G Robins; Anthonin Reilhac Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Liwen Zhang; Elijah Mak; Anthonin Reilhac; Hee Y Shim; Kwun K Ng; Marcus Q W Ong; Fang Ji; Eddie J Y Chong; Xin Xu; Zi X Wong; Mary C Stephenson; Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian; Boon Y Tan; John T O'Brien; Juan H Zhou; Christopher L H Chen Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 5.038