Literature DB >> 31863136

Improved quantification of amyloid burden and associated biomarker cut-off points: results from the first amyloid Singaporean cohort with overlapping cerebrovascular disease.

Tomotaka Tanaka1,2,3, Mary C Stephenson4, Ying-Hwey Nai4, Damian Khor5, Francis N Saridin6, Saima Hilal6,7, Steven Villaraza6, Bibek Gyanwali6, Masafumi Ihara8, Henri Vrooman9, Ashley A Weekes4, John J Totman4, Edward G Robins4,10, Christopher P Chen6, Anthonin Reilhac4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The analysis of the [11C]PiB-PET amyloid images of a unique Asian cohort of 186 participants featuring overlapping vascular diseases raised the question about the validity of current standards for amyloid quantification under abnormal conditions. In this work, we implemented a novel pipeline for improved amyloid PET quantification of this atypical cohort.
METHODS: The investigated data correction and amyloid quantification methods included motion correction, standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) quantification using the parcellated MRI (standard method) and SUVr quantification without MRI. We introduced a novel amyloid analysis method yielding 2 biomarkers: AβL which quantifies the global Aβ burden and ns that characterizes the non-specific uptake. Cut-off points were first determined using visual assessment as ground truth and then using unsupervised classification techniques.
RESULTS: Subject's motion impacts the accuracy of the measurement outcome but has however a limited effect on the visual rating and cut-off point determination. SUVr computation can be reliably performed for all the subjects without MRI parcellation while, when required, the parcellation failed or was of mediocre quality in 10% of the cases. The novel biomarker AβL showed an association increase of 29.5% with the cognitive tests and increased effect size between positive and negative scans compared with SUVr. ns was found sensitive to cerebral microbleeds, white matter hyperintensity, volume, and age. The cut-off points for SUVr using parcellated MRI, SUVr without parcellation, and AβL were 1.56, 1.39, and 25.5. Finally, k-means produced valid cut-off points without the requirement of visual assessment.
CONCLUSION: The optimal processing for the amyloid quantification of this atypical cohort allows the quantification of all the subjects, producing SUVr values and two novel biomarkers: AβL, showing important increased in their association with various cognitive tests, and ns, a parameter sensitive to non-specific retention variations caused by age and cerebrovascular diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; Amyloid PET; Biomarkers; Cerebrovascular disease; Cut-off point; Quantification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31863136     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04642-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  35 in total

1.  The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Guy M McKhann; David S Knopman; Howard Chertkow; Bradley T Hyman; Clifford R Jack; Claudia H Kawas; William E Klunk; Walter J Koroshetz; Jennifer J Manly; Richard Mayeux; Richard C Mohs; John C Morris; Martin N Rossor; Philip Scheltens; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Sandra Weintraub; Creighton H Phelps
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 21.566

2.  Quantification of blood flow-dependent component in estimates of beta-amyloid load obtained using quasi-steady-state standardized uptake value ratio.

Authors:  Zsolt Cselényi; Lars Farde
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Amyloid Load: A More Sensitive Biomarker for Amyloid Imaging.

Authors:  Alex Whittington; Roger N Gunn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria.

Authors:  Bruno Dubois; Howard H Feldman; Claudia Jacova; Harald Hampel; José Luis Molinuevo; Kaj Blennow; Steven T DeKosky; Serge Gauthier; Dennis Selkoe; Randall Bateman; Stefano Cappa; Sebastian Crutch; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Giovanni B Frisoni; Nick C Fox; Douglas Galasko; Marie-Odile Habert; Gregory A Jicha; Agneta Nordberg; Florence Pasquier; Gil Rabinovici; Philippe Robert; Christopher Rowe; Stephen Salloway; Marie Sarazin; Stéphane Epelbaum; Leonardo C de Souza; Bruno Vellas; Pieter J Visser; Lon Schneider; Yaakov Stern; Philip Scheltens; Jeffrey L Cummings
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 44.182

5.  White Matter Reference Region in PET Studies of 11C-Pittsburgh Compound B Uptake: Effects of Age and Amyloid-β Deposition.

Authors:  Val J Lowe; Emily S Lundt; Matthew L Senjem; Christopher G Schwarz; Hoon-Ki Min; Scott A Przybelski; Kejal Kantarci; David Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Binding of 11C-Pittsburgh compound-B correlated with white matter injury in hypertensive small vessel disease.

Authors:  Tetsuya Hashimoto; Chiaki Yokota; Kazuhiro Koshino; Takashi Temma; Makoto Yamazaki; Satoshi Iguchi; Ryo Shimomura; Toshiyuki Uehara; Naoko Funatsu; Tenyu Hino; Kazuo Minematsu; Hidehiro Iida; Kazunori Toyoda
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.668

7.  PIB is a non-specific imaging marker of amyloid-beta (Abeta) peptide-related cerebral amyloidosis.

Authors:  A Lockhart; J R Lamb; T Osredkar; L I Sue; J N Joyce; L Ye; V Libri; D Leppert; T G Beach
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Existing Pittsburgh Compound-B positron emission tomography thresholds are too high: statistical and pathological evaluation.

Authors:  Sylvia Villeneuve; Gil D Rabinovici; Brendan I Cohn-Sheehy; Cindee Madison; Nagehan Ayakta; Pia M Ghosh; Renaud La Joie; Samia Kate Arthur-Bentil; Jacob W Vogel; Shawn M Marks; Manja Lehmann; Howard J Rosen; Bruce Reed; John Olichney; Adam L Boxer; Bruce L Miller; Ewa Borys; Lee-Way Jin; Eric J Huang; Lea T Grinberg; Charles DeCarli; William W Seeley; William Jagust
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 9.  NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Clifford R Jack; David A Bennett; Kaj Blennow; Maria C Carrillo; Billy Dunn; Samantha Budd Haeberlein; David M Holtzman; William Jagust; Frank Jessen; Jason Karlawish; Enchi Liu; Jose Luis Molinuevo; Thomas Montine; Creighton Phelps; Katherine P Rankin; Christopher C Rowe; Philip Scheltens; Eric Siemers; Heather M Snyder; Reisa Sperling
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 21.566

10.  Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Joanna M Wardlaw; Eric E Smith; Geert J Biessels; Charlotte Cordonnier; Franz Fazekas; Richard Frayne; Richard I Lindley; John T O'Brien; Frederik Barkhof; Oscar R Benavente; Sandra E Black; Carol Brayne; Monique Breteler; Hugues Chabriat; Charles Decarli; Frank-Erik de Leeuw; Fergus Doubal; Marco Duering; Nick C Fox; Steven Greenberg; Vladimir Hachinski; Ingo Kilimann; Vincent Mok; Robert van Oostenbrugge; Leonardo Pantoni; Oliver Speck; Blossom C M Stephan; Stefan Teipel; Anand Viswanathan; David Werring; Christopher Chen; Colin Smith; Mark van Buchem; Bo Norrving; Philip B Gorelick; Martin Dichgans
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 44.182

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of Three Automated Approaches for Classification of Amyloid-PET Images.

Authors:  Ying-Hwey Nai; Yee-Hsin Tay; Tomotaka Tanaka; Christopher P Chen; Edward G Robins; Anthonin Reilhac
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2022-05-27

2.  Non-negative matrix factorisation improves Centiloid robustness in longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Pierrick Bourgeat; Vincent Doré; James Doecke; David Ames; Colin L Masters; Christopher C Rowe; Jurgen Fripp; Victor L Villemagne
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Assessment of motion and model bias on the detection of dopamine response to behavioral challenge.

Authors:  Michael A Levine; Joseph B Mandeville; Finnegan Calabro; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Daniel B Chonde; Kevin T Chen; Inki Hong; Julie C Price; Beatriz Luna; Ciprian Catana
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.960

4.  Improved amyloid burden quantification with nonspecific estimates using deep learning.

Authors:  Haohui Liu; Ying-Hwey Nai; Francis Saridin; Tomotaka Tanaka; Jim O' Doherty; Saima Hilal; Bibek Gyanwali; Christopher P Chen; Edward G Robins; Anthonin Reilhac
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  In vivo imaging of tau deposition in Alzheimer's disease using both [18F]-THK5317 and [18F]-S16: A pilot human study.

Authors:  Liping Fu; Jinming Zhang; Kaixiang Zhou; Xiaojun Zhang; Hengge Xie; Mingwei Zhu; Mengchao Cui; Ruimin Wang
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 5.702

6.  Monitoring and Prognostic Analysis of Severe Cerebrovascular Diseases Based on Multi-Scale Dynamic Brain Imaging.

Authors:  Suting Zhong; Kai Sun; Xiaobing Zuo; Aihong Chen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  AMYQ: An index to standardize quantitative amyloid load across PET tracers.

Authors:  Jordi Pegueroles; Victor Montal; Alexandre Bejanin; Eduard Vilaplana; Mateus Aranha; Miguel Angel Santos-Santos; Daniel Alcolea; Ignasi Carrió; Valle Camacho; Rafael Blesa; Alberto Lleó; Juan Fortea
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 21.566

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.