Clara Matthiessen1, Sarah Lucht2, Frauke Hennig2, Simone Ohlwein2, Hermann Jakobs3, Karl-Heinz Jöckel4, Susanne Moebus4, Barbara Hoffmann2. 1. Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. Electronic address: clara.matthiessen@med.uni-duesseldorf.de. 2. Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. 3. Rhenish Institute for Environmental Research, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. 4. Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IMIBE), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Recently, epidemiological studies have found a link between air pollution (AP) and individual components of the metabolic syndrome (MetS), a condition predisposing to cardiometabolic diseases. However, very few studies have explored a possible association between air pollution and MetS. OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the effects of long-term exposure to airborne particulate matter and NO2 on prevalence and incidence of MetS. METHODS: We used data of the population-based prospective Heinz Nixdorf Recall study (baseline 2000-2003) to investigate the association(s) between AP exposure and MetS prevalence at baseline (n = 4457) and MetS incidence at first follow-up visit (n = 3074; average follow-up: 5.1 years). Mean annual exposure to size-fractioned particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5, PMcoarse, and PM2.5abs) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) was assessed using a land use regression model. MetS was defined as central obesity plus two out of four additional risk factors (i.e., elevated triglycerides, reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, elevated blood pressure or elevated plasma glucose). We estimated odds ratios (ORs) of MetS prevalence and incidence per interquartile range (IQR) of exposure, adjusting for demographic and lifestyle variables. RESULTS: We observed a MetS prevalence of 20.7% (n = 922) and an incidence of 9.7% (n = 299). NO2 was positively associated with MetS prevalence, with an OR increase per IQR of 1.12 (95%-CI 1.02-1.24, IQR = 6.1 μg/m3). PM10 and PM2.5 were both borderline positively associated with MetS incidence, with ORs of 1.14 (95%-CI 0.99-1.32, IQR = 2.1 μg/m3) and 1.19 (95%-CI 0.98-1.44, IQR = 1.5 μg/m3) per IQR, respectively. CONCLUSION: In summary, we found a weak positive association between air pollution and MetS. The strongest and most consistent effects were observed between NO2 and prevalent MetS.
INTRODUCTION: Recently, epidemiological studies have found a link between air pollution (AP) and individual components of the metabolic syndrome (MetS), a condition predisposing to cardiometabolic diseases. However, very few studies have explored a possible association between air pollution and MetS. OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the effects of long-term exposure to airborne particulate matter and NO2 on prevalence and incidence of MetS. METHODS: We used data of the population-based prospective Heinz Nixdorf Recall study (baseline 2000-2003) to investigate the association(s) between AP exposure and MetS prevalence at baseline (n = 4457) and MetS incidence at first follow-up visit (n = 3074; average follow-up: 5.1 years). Mean annual exposure to size-fractioned particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5, PMcoarse, and PM2.5abs) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) was assessed using a land use regression model. MetS was defined as central obesity plus two out of four additional risk factors (i.e., elevated triglycerides, reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, elevated blood pressure or elevated plasma glucose). We estimated odds ratios (ORs) of MetS prevalence and incidence per interquartile range (IQR) of exposure, adjusting for demographic and lifestyle variables. RESULTS: We observed a MetS prevalence of 20.7% (n = 922) and an incidence of 9.7% (n = 299). NO2 was positively associated with MetS prevalence, with an OR increase per IQR of 1.12 (95%-CI 1.02-1.24, IQR = 6.1 μg/m3). PM10 and PM2.5 were both borderline positively associated with MetS incidence, with ORs of 1.14 (95%-CI 0.99-1.32, IQR = 2.1 μg/m3) and 1.19 (95%-CI 0.98-1.44, IQR = 1.5 μg/m3) per IQR, respectively. CONCLUSION: In summary, we found a weak positive association between air pollution and MetS. The strongest and most consistent effects were observed between NO2 and prevalent MetS.
Authors: Grzegorz Józef Nowicki; Barbara Ślusarska; Katarzyna Naylor; Andrzej Prystupa; Ewa Rudnicka-Drożak; Ulyana Halyuk; Petro Pokotylo Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 3.168
Authors: Dana Boyd Barr; Naveen Puttaswamy; Lindsay M Jaacks; Kyle Steenland; Sarah Rajkumar; Savannah Gupton; P Barry Ryan; Kalpana Balakrishnan; Jennifer L Peel; William Checkley; Thomas Clasen; Maggie L Clark Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2020-04-29 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Dayana Milena Agudelo-Castañeda; Elba Calesso Teixeira; Larissa Alves; Julián Alfredo Fernández-Niño; Laura Andrea Rodríguez-Villamizar Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Linxin Liu; Lijing L Yan; Yuebin Lv; Yi Zhang; Tiantian Li; Cunrui Huang; Haidong Kan; Junfeng Zhang; Yi Zeng; Xiaoming Shi; John S Ji Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-05-04 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Anthony Barnett; Ester Cerin; Erika Martino; Luke D Knibbs; Jonathan E Shaw; David W Dunstan; Dianna J Magliano; David Donaire-Gonzalez Journal: Environ Health Date: 2022-09-03 Impact factor: 7.123
Authors: Samantha J Snow; Andres R Henriquez; Jenifer I Fenton; Travis Goeden; Anna Fisher; Beena Vallanat; Michelle Angrish; Judy E Richards; Mette C Schladweiler; Wan-Yun Cheng; Charles E Wood; Haiyan Tong; Urmila P Kodavanti Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 4.219