Literature DB >> 31021973

Association between maternal exposure to pollutant particulate matter 2.5 and congenital heart defects: a systematic review.

Katie C Hall1,2, Jennifer C Robinson1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to determine if there was an association between maternal exposure to pollutant particulate matter 2.5 during the first trimester of pregnancy and congenital heart defects within the first year of life.
INTRODUCTION: The environment is recognized as an important determinant of health for both the individual and population. Air pollution specifically is a major environmental risk factor impacting health with links to asthma, heart disease, obesity, and fetal developmental complications. Of the commonly monitored air pollutants, particulate matter 2.5 has associations with health, especially among vulnerable populations such as children and pregnant women. A congenital heart defect is a fetal complication that impacts 34.3 million infants globally, with more than 80% of the diagnoses having an unknown etiology. Although environmental risk factors such as air pollution are thought to be a risk factor in the diagnosis of a congenital heart defect, epidemiologic research evidence is limited. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review considered studies that evaluated maternal exposure to the air pollutant particulate matter 2.5 during the first trimester (weeks 1-12) of fetal development. The primary outcome was a diagnosis of a congenital heart defect in an infant within the first year of life.
METHODS: A three-step search strategy was utilized in this review and included 11 databases and two websites. Studies published from January 2002 to September 2018 were eligible for inclusion. Only papers published in English were included. Eligible studies underwent critical appraisal by two independent reviewers using standardized critical appraisal instruments from JBI. Quantitative data were extracted from the included studies independently by two reviewers. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted for the individual outcome measures, specifically atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, and tetralogy of fallot, respectively. The defects were identified and pooled, where possible, in statistical meta-analysis. Where statistical pooling was not possible, findings were reported narratively.
RESULTS: Five studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria, including three cohort and two case-control designs. Each individual study identified at least one statistically significant increase or inverse association between particulate matter 2.5 and a congenital heart defect. An increased risk was identified with more than seven isolated and two groupings of congenital heart defects. An inverse risk was identified with two isolated and one grouping of congenital heart defects. Meta-analysis results were: atrial septal defect, OR = 0.65 (95% CI, 0.37 to 1.15); ventricular septal defect, OR = 1.02 (95% CI, 075 to 1.37); and tetralogy of fallot, OR = 1.16 (95% CI, 0.78 to 1.73), indicating no statistically significant findings.
CONCLUSION: There was no significant evidence to support an association between air pollutant particulate matter 2.5 and a congenital heart defect in the first year of life. However, few studies met the rigorous inclusion criteria, and the studies that did had high heterogeneity, making it difficult to complete a meta-analysis with such a limited number of articles. Further research is needed to standardize the outcomes and pollutant monitoring methods, and provide comparable analysis results so that future synthesis of the literature can be conducted.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31021973      PMCID: PMC6707530          DOI: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep        ISSN: 2202-4433


  39 in total

Review 1.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson; Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06

Review 2.  Air pollution exposure assessment methods utilized in epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Bin Zou; J Gaines Wilson; F Benjamin Zhan; Yongnian Zeng
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2009-02-13

3.  Geographic and occupational risk factors for ventricular septal defects: Washington State, 1987-2003.

Authors:  Maneesh Batra; Carrie L Heike; Richard C Phillips; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2007-01

4.  Ambient air pollution and risk of birth defects in Southern California.

Authors:  Beate Ritz; Fei Yu; Scott Fruin; Guadalupe Chapa; Gary M Shaw; John A Harris
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Maternal exposure to ambient air pollutants and risk of congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Judith Rankin; Tom Chadwick; Malathi Natarajan; Denise Howel; Mark S Pearce; Tanja Pless-Mulloli
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 6.  Noninherited risk factors and congenital cardiovascular defects: current knowledge: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Authors:  Kathy J Jenkins; Adolfo Correa; Jeffrey A Feinstein; Lorenzo Botto; Amy E Britt; Stephen R Daniels; Marsha Elixson; Carole A Warnes; Catherine L Webb
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  The incidence of congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Julien I E Hoffman; Samuel Kaplan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Prevalence of congenital heart defects in metropolitan Atlanta, 1998-2005.

Authors:  Mark D Reller; Matthew J Strickland; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; William T Mahle; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Ambient air pollution and birth defects in brisbane, australia.

Authors:  Craig A Hansen; Adrian G Barnett; Bin B Jalaludin; Geoffrey G Morgan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  1 in total

1.  Environmental and Genetic Risk Factors of Congenital Anomalies: an Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Kyung Shin Lee; Yoon Jung Choi; Jinwoo Cho; Hyunji Lee; Heejin Lee; Soo Jin Park; Joong Shin Park; Yun Chul Hong
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.153

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.