Shashwath A Meda1, Brett A Clementz2, John A Sweeney3, Matcheri S Keshavan4, Carol A Tamminga3, Elena I Ivleva3, Godfrey D Pearlson5. 1. Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living at Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut. Electronic address: shashwath.meda@hhchealth.org. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living at Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We sought to examine resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity measures in psychotic patients to both identify cumulative differences across psychosis and subsequently probe deficits across conventional DSM-IV diagnoses and a newly identified classification using cognitive/neurophysiological data (Biotypes). METHODS: We assessed 1125 subjects, including healthy control subjects, probands (schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, psychotic bipolar disorder), and relatives of probands. Probands and relatives were also segregated into Biotype groups (B1-B3, B1R-B3R using a method reported previously). Empirical resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging networks were derived using independent component analysis. Global psychosis-related abnormalities were first identified. Subsequent post hoc t tests were performed across various diagnostic categories. Follow-up linear mixed model compared significance of within-proband differences across categories. Secondary analyses assessed correlations with biological profile scores. RESULTS: Voxelwise tests between proband and control subjects revealed nine abnormal networks. Post hoc analysis revealed lower connectivity in most networks for all proband subgroups (DSM and Biotypes). Within-proband effect sizes of discrimination were marginally better for Biotypes over DSM. Reduced connectivity was noted in relatives of patients with schizophrenia in two networks and relatives of patients with psychotic bipolar disorder in one network. Biotype relatives showed similar deficits in one network. Connectivity deficits across four networks were significantly associated with cognitive control profile scores. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we found psychosis-related connectivity deficits in nine large-scale networks. Deficits in these networks tracked more closely with cognitive control factors, suggesting potential implications for disease profiling and therapeutic intervention. Biotypes performed marginally better in terms of separating out psychosis subgroups compared with conventional DSM or psychiatric diagnoses.
BACKGROUND: We sought to examine resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity measures in psychoticpatients to both identify cumulative differences across psychosis and subsequently probe deficits across conventional DSM-IV diagnoses and a newly identified classification using cognitive/neurophysiological data (Biotypes). METHODS: We assessed 1125 subjects, including healthy control subjects, probands (schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, psychotic bipolar disorder), and relatives of probands. Probands and relatives were also segregated into Biotype groups (B1-B3, B1R-B3R using a method reported previously). Empirical resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging networks were derived using independent component analysis. Global psychosis-related abnormalities were first identified. Subsequent post hoc t tests were performed across various diagnostic categories. Follow-up linear mixed model compared significance of within-proband differences across categories. Secondary analyses assessed correlations with biological profile scores. RESULTS: Voxelwise tests between proband and control subjects revealed nine abnormal networks. Post hoc analysis revealed lower connectivity in most networks for all proband subgroups (DSM and Biotypes). Within-proband effect sizes of discrimination were marginally better for Biotypes over DSM. Reduced connectivity was noted in relatives of patients with schizophrenia in two networks and relatives of patients with psychotic bipolar disorder in one network. Biotype relatives showed similar deficits in one network. Connectivity deficits across four networks were significantly associated with cognitive control profile scores. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we found psychosis-related connectivity deficits in nine large-scale networks. Deficits in these networks tracked more closely with cognitive control factors, suggesting potential implications for disease profiling and therapeutic intervention. Biotypes performed marginally better in terms of separating out psychosis subgroups compared with conventional DSM or psychiatric diagnoses.
Authors: Leah H Rubin; Siyi Li; Li Yao; Sarah K Keedy; James L Reilly; Scot K Hill; Jeffrey R Bishop; C Sue Carter; Hossein Pournajafi-Nazarloo; Lauren L Drogos; Elliot Gershon; Godfrey D Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; Brett A Clementz; Matcheri S Keshavan; Su Lui; John A Sweeney Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2018-07-06 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Dov B Lerman-Sinkoff; Sridhar Kandala; Vince D Calhoun; Deanna M Barch; Daniel T Mamah Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2019-05-20
Authors: Kathryn E Lewandowski; Julie M McCarthy; Dost Öngür; Lesley A Norris; Geoffrey Z Liu; Richard J Juelich; Justin T Baker Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Matthew E Hudgens-Haney; Brett A Clementz; Elena I Ivleva; Matcheri S Keshavan; Godfrey D Pearlson; Elliot S Gershon; Sarah K Keedy; John A Sweeney; Florence Gaudoux; Pierre Bunouf; Benoit Canolle; Françoise Tonner; Silvia Gatti-McArthur; Carol A Tamminga Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Yuhui Du; Godfrey D Pearlson; Dongdong Lin; Jing Sui; Jiayu Chen; Mustafa Salman; Carol A Tamminga; Elena I Ivleva; John A Sweeney; Matcheri S Keshavan; Brett A Clementz; Juan Bustillo; Vince D Calhoun Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Jennifer A Brown; Brooke S Jackson; Courtney R Burton; Jennifer E Hoy; John A Sweeney; Godfrey D Pearlson; Matcheri S Keshavan; Sarah S Keedy; Elliot S Gershon; Carol A Tamminga; Brett A Clementz; Jennifer E McDowell Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Yuan Xiao; Wei Liao; Zhiliang Long; Bo Tao; Qiannan Zhao; Chunyan Luo; Carol A Tamminga; Matcheri S Keshavan; Godfrey D Pearlson; Brett A Clementz; Elliot S Gershon; Elena I Ivleva; Sarah K Keedy; Bharat B Biswal; Andrea Mechelli; Rebekka Lencer; John A Sweeney; Su Lui; Qiyong Gong Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 7.348
Authors: Wenjing Zhang; Du Lei; Sarah K Keedy; Elena I Ivleva; Seenae Eum; Li Yao; Carol A Tamminga; Brett A Clementz; Matcheri S Keshavan; Godfrey D Pearlson; Elliot S Gershon; Jeffrey R Bishop; Qiyong Gong; Su Lui; John A Sweeney Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2019-12-07 Impact factor: 7.853