| Literature DB >> 29652911 |
Haifa Jmel1,2, Lilia Romdhane1,2, Yosra Ben Halima1,3, Meriem Hechmi1,2, Chokri Naouali1,3, Hamza Dallali1,2, Yosr Hamdi1, Jingxuan Shan4, Abdelmajid Abid5, Henda Jamoussi5, Sameh Trabelsi6, Lotfi Chouchane4, Donata Luiselli7, Sonia Abdelhak1,3, Rym Kefi1,3.
Abstract
Genetic variation is an important determinant affecting either drug response or susceptibility to adverse drug reactions. Several studies have highlighted the importance of ethnicity in influencing drug response variability that should be considered during drug development. Our objective is to characterize the genetic variability of some pharmacogenes involved in the response to drugs used for the treatment of Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) in Tunisia and to compare our results to the worldwide populations. A set of 135 Tunisians was genotyped using the Affymetrix Chip 6.0 genotyping array. Variants located in 24 Very Important Pharmacogenes (VIP) involved in MetS drug response were extracted from the genotyping data. Analysis of variant distribution in Tunisian population compared to 20 worldwide populations publicly available was performed using R software packages. Common variants between Tunisians and the 20 investigated populations were extracted from genotyping data. Multidimensional screening showed that Tunisian population is clustered with North African and European populations. The greatest divergence was observed with the African and Asian population. In addition, we performed Inter-ethnic comparison based on the genotype frequencies of five VIP biomarkers. The genotype frequencies of the biomarkers rs3846662, rs1045642, rs7294 and rs12255372 located respectively in HMGCR, ABCB1, VKORC1 and TCF7L2 are similar between Tunisian, Tuscan (TSI) and European (CEU). The genotype frequency of the variant rs776746 located in CYP3A5 gene is similar between Tunisian and African populations and different from CEU and TSI. The present study shows that the genetic make up of the Tunisian population is relatively complex in regard to pharmacogenes and reflects previous historical events. It is important to consider this ethnic difference in drug prescription in order to optimize drug response to avoid serious adverse drug reactions. Taking into account similarities with other neighboring populations, our study has an impact not only on the Tunisian population but also on North African population which are underrepresented in pharmacogenomic studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29652911 PMCID: PMC5898725 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194842
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Basic information of selected pharmacogenes.
| Class of Drug | Drug name | Genes ID | Description | Category Family | Phase | Chr | Localisation of Gene | VIP (High evidence level) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anticagulant | Clopidogrel (Palvix) | ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 1 | ABC transporters superfamily | Other | 7 | chr7:87,133,179–87,342,638 | rs10545642 rs1128503 rs2032582 | |
| cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily D member 6 | Cytochrome P450 superfamily | phaseI | 22 | chr22:42126499–42130881 | rs3892097 | |||
| cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C member 19 | Cytochrome P450 superfamily | phaseI | 10 | chr10:96,522,438–96,612,962 | rs1057910 rs4244285 | |||
| purinergic receptor P2Y, G-protein coupled, 12 | G-protein coupled receptor | Other | 3 | chr3:151,054,631–151,102,600 | ||||
| Acenocoumarol | cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C member 2 | Cytochrome P450 superfamily | phaseI | 10 | chr10:96,698,415–96,749,148 | rs1057910 | ||
| vitamin K epoxide reductase complex, subunit 1 | Vitamin K epoxide reductase | phaseI | 16 | chr16:31,102,163–31,106,320 | rs9934438 rs7294 | |||
| Antidiabetic | Biguanide/Metformine | solute carrier family 22 (organic cation transporter), member 1 | Organic cation transporte | other | 6 | chr6:160,542,863–160,579,750 | ||
| Biguanide/Metformine | solute carrier family 22 (organic cation transporter), member 2 | Organic cation transporte | other | 6 | chr6:160,637,794–160,679,963 | |||
| Biguanide/Metformine | solute carrier family 47 (multidrug and toxin extrusion), member 1 | Multidrug and toxin extrusion | other | 17 | chr17:19,437,167–19,482,346 | |||
| Biguanide/Metformine | solute carrier family 47 (multidrug and toxin extrusion), member 2 | Multidrug and toxin extrusion | other | chr17:19,581,628–19,620,043 | ||||
| Biguanide/Metformine | ATM serine/threonine kinase | Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related kinase superfamily | Other | 11 | chr11:108,093,559–108,239,826 | rs11212617 | ||
| TZD/Pioglitazone | peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma | Nuclear receptors superfamily | Other | 3 | ||||
| TZD/Rosiglitazone | peroxisome proliferative activated receptor, gamma, coactivator 1 alpha | Nuclear receptors superfamily | Other | 5 | chr5:51,454,249–51,553,921 | rs1801282 | ||
| TZD/Troglitazone | Resitin | 19 | chr19:7,669,086–7,670,454 | |||||
| leptin receptor | Cytokine receptors superfamily | Other | 1 | chr1:65,420,652–65,635,428 | ||||
| Tumor Necrosis Factor | Tumor necrosis factor receptor | 31 | chr6:31,543,344–31,546,112 | |||||
| Sulphonylurea | potassium channel, inwardly rectifying subfamily J, member 11 | Potassium channel | Modifier | 11 | chr11:17,406,796–17,410,206 | rs5215 rs5219 rs757110 | ||
| ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 8 | ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters | Modifier | 11 | chr11:17,414,432–17,498,392 | ||||
| potassium channel, voltage gated KQT-like subfamily Q, member 1 | Potassium Channel superfamily | Other | 11 | chr11:2,466,221–2,870,340 | ||||
| transcription factor 7-like 2 (T-cell specific, HMG-box) | DNA-binding proteins. | Other | 10 | chr10:114,710,009–114,927,436 | rs12255372 | |||
| Lipid lowring Fenofibrate | Flavastatin | Cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C member 9 | Cytochrome P450 | phaseI | 10 | chr10:96,698,415–96,749,148 | ||
| Lovastatin | ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 1 | ABC transporters superfamily | Other | 7 | chr7:87,133,179–87,342,638 | rs1128503 | ||
| Atorvastatin | ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 1 | ABC transporters superfamily | Other | 7 | chr7:87,133,179–87,342,638 | rs2032582, | ||
| ATP-binding cassette, sub-family A (ABC1), member 1 | ABC transporters sub-family A | Other | 9 | chr9:104,781,003–104,928,246 | rs12003906 | |||
| Cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C member 9 | Cytochrome P450 | phaseI | 10 | chr10:96,698,415–96,749,148 | rs1057910 | |||
| Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha | Nuclear hormone receptor superfamily | 22 | chr22:46,546,499–46,639,653 | |||||
| Solute carrier organic anion transporter family, member 1B1 | Solute carrier family | Others | chr22:46,546,499–46,639,653 | rs4149056 rs4149081 rs4363657 rs4149015 | ||||
| 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase | HMGCR superfamily | 5 | chr5:74,632,993–74,657,926 | rs17238540 rs3846662 rs17244841 | ||||
| cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A member 5 | Cytochrome P450 superfamily | Phase I | 7 | chr7:99,245,812–99,277,649 | rs776746 |
The list of 24 pharmacogenes implicated in MetS components drug response modulation, including class of drug, drug name, gene name, description and category family of genes, pharmacokinetic phase of drug metabolism, chromosomal localization and the corresponding common VIP variant.
Fig 1Multidimensional scaling plot analysis of the Tunisian subpopulation and worldwide populations.
The plot reveals three distinct clusters showing that the Tunisian population present a close affinity with the North Africans and Europeans and distinct from South Africans and Asians. Tunisian population; Capital Tunis TU_TC, coastal city of Monastir TU_MC (AffymetrixChip 6.0 genotyping array), African ancestry in the south Western USA (ASW); a northwestern European population (CEU); the Han Chinese in Beijing, China (CHB); a Chinese population of metropolitan Denver, Colorado, USA (CHD); the Gujarati Indians in Houston, Texas, USA (GIH); the Japanese population in Tokyo, Japan (JPT); the Luhya people in Webuye, Kenya (LWK); people of Mexican ancestry living in Los Angeles, California, USA (MEX); the Maasai people in Kinyawa, Kenya (MKK); the Tuscan people of Italy (TSI); and the Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria (YRI); data from HapMap were retrived in March 2016. It is available by FTP: ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/hapmap/ and Algeria (ALG), Egyptia (EGY), Libya (LIB), Tunisia Dwiret TUN_Ber, Lebanon (LIB), Morocco South (MCS), Morocco North (MCN), Spain South (SPS), Spain North (SPN), Spain Basc (SBA),: Sub-Saharan (SAH), Canary Island (CIS); data from the literature [34, 35].
Genotype frequency of significant VIP variants in Tunisian population (n = 135) compared with ten HapMap populations.
| Gene name | SNP ID | Freq.(TUN)* | p-values against ten populations after Bonferroni correction | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | AB | BB | CEU | TSI | ASW | LWK | MKK | YRI | CHB | CHD | GIH | MEX | ||
| rs776746 | 0;66 | 0;26 | 0;08 | 1.403e-05 | 0.0001 | 0.0056 | ||||||||
| rs3846662 | 0.29 | 0.47 | 0.25 | 7.205e-12 | 2.2e-16 | 8.61e-10 | 2.2e-16 | |||||||
| rs1045642 | 0.49 | 0.33 | 0.18 | 0.0007 | - | 0.0004 | 6.802e-06 | 0.0066 | 0.0066 | 0.0002 | ||||
| rs7294 | 0.65 | 0.27 | 0.09 | 4.081e-07 | 3.722e-06 | 2.226e-06 | 6.742e-05 | 0.0005 | 0.0001 | 0.0013 | ||||
| rs12255372 | 0.48 | 0.33 | 0.19 | 4.248e-10 | 0.0002 | |||||||||
Bonferroni correction was applied to the level of significance, which was set at (p.value < 0.05/5*10 = 0.001);p.value > (0.05/5*10) assigned in bold represent differences not statistically significant between Tunisia and the compared population, 0.00 not observed genotypes; -: not successfully genotyped or not compared by chi-square test. TUN* = (TN_Mc/TN_TC), MEX = Mexican ancestry in Los Angeles, California; TSI = Toscans in Italy; LWK = Luhya in Webuye, Kenya; ASW = African ancestry in Southwest USA; GIH = Gujarati Indians in Houston, Texas; MKK = Maasai.
Estimating of pairwise Fst among the 11 populations.
| TN_TC | TN_MC | ASW | CEU | CHB | CHD | GIH | LWK | MEX | MKK | TSI | YRI | |
| TN_TC | 0 | |||||||||||
| TN_MC | 0.01182 | 0 | ||||||||||
| ASW | 0.15553 | 0.23478 | 0 | |||||||||
| CEU | 0.06517 | 0.04978 | 0.29914 | 0 | ||||||||
| CHB | 0.02268 | 0.02350 | 0.21765 | 0.09797 | 0 | |||||||
| CHD | 0.06546 | 0.09602 | 0.26864 | 0.11989 | 0.00179 | 0 | ||||||
| GIH | 0.10636 | 0.14372 | 0.17866 | 0.08929 | 0.18313 | 0.21073 | 0 | |||||
| LWK | 0.24521 | 0.32005 | 0.02744 | 0.35559 | 0.27347 | 0.32958 | 0.22448 | 0 | ||||
| MEX | 0.02691 | 0.02635 | 0.2041 | 0.031436 | 0.04645 | 0.06478 | 0.08524 | 0.27337 | 0 | |||
| MKK | 0.12447 | 0.21536 | 0.03173 | 0.25203 | 0.18501 | 0.18924 | 0.15348 | 0.09203 | 0.16398 | 0 | ||
| TSI | 0.02872 | 0.01614 | 0.26226 | 0.00802 | 0.06736 | 0.11424 | 0.09639 | 0.34295 | 0.02816 | 0.22575 | 0 | |
| YRI | 0.27506 | 0.35929 | 0.01749 | 0.41201 | 0.32575 | 0.37106 | 0.29278 | 0.00276 | 0.32288 | 0.08404 | 0.38693 | 0 |
The pairwise differences Fst values between 11 populations. Fst value is less than 0.15 represent that there is no genetic differentiation between the two populations. The lowest level of differentiations were found between TN_TC and TN_MC (Fst = 0,01182) followed by the TSI (Fst = 0.02872) and MEX (Fst = 0,0269) populations, whereas the greatest divergence was observed with the LWK population (Fst = 0,35929).
Fig 2STRUCTURE analysis of the genetic relationship between 24 populations.
K is the possible numbers of parental population clusters. One color represents one parental population into different color segments. Best K level was observed at K = 3, where a vertical the proportion of each ancestral component in a single individual is represented by a vertical bar divided into 3 colors. 601 markers study—displaying results for runs with highest likelihood out of 27 runs in each cluster K3 to 10. Black vertical lines identify the population boundaries. The height extent of each color within an individual’s color bar corresponds to the estimated membership of the individual in one of the clusters; each cluster is assigned a separate color. The bars with multiple colors can be interpreted as genetic admixture or as relative probabilities of belonging to the different clusters.