Literature DB >> 29652911

Pharmacogenetic landscape of Metabolic Syndrome components drug response in Tunisia and comparison with worldwide populations.

Haifa Jmel1,2, Lilia Romdhane1,2, Yosra Ben Halima1,3, Meriem Hechmi1,2, Chokri Naouali1,3, Hamza Dallali1,2, Yosr Hamdi1, Jingxuan Shan4, Abdelmajid Abid5, Henda Jamoussi5, Sameh Trabelsi6, Lotfi Chouchane4, Donata Luiselli7, Sonia Abdelhak1,3, Rym Kefi1,3.   

Abstract

Genetic variation is an important determinant affecting either drug response or susceptibility to adverse drug reactions. Several studies have highlighted the importance of ethnicity in influencing drug response variability that should be considered during drug development. Our objective is to characterize the genetic variability of some pharmacogenes involved in the response to drugs used for the treatment of Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) in Tunisia and to compare our results to the worldwide populations. A set of 135 Tunisians was genotyped using the Affymetrix Chip 6.0 genotyping array. Variants located in 24 Very Important Pharmacogenes (VIP) involved in MetS drug response were extracted from the genotyping data. Analysis of variant distribution in Tunisian population compared to 20 worldwide populations publicly available was performed using R software packages. Common variants between Tunisians and the 20 investigated populations were extracted from genotyping data. Multidimensional screening showed that Tunisian population is clustered with North African and European populations. The greatest divergence was observed with the African and Asian population. In addition, we performed Inter-ethnic comparison based on the genotype frequencies of five VIP biomarkers. The genotype frequencies of the biomarkers rs3846662, rs1045642, rs7294 and rs12255372 located respectively in HMGCR, ABCB1, VKORC1 and TCF7L2 are similar between Tunisian, Tuscan (TSI) and European (CEU). The genotype frequency of the variant rs776746 located in CYP3A5 gene is similar between Tunisian and African populations and different from CEU and TSI. The present study shows that the genetic make up of the Tunisian population is relatively complex in regard to pharmacogenes and reflects previous historical events. It is important to consider this ethnic difference in drug prescription in order to optimize drug response to avoid serious adverse drug reactions. Taking into account similarities with other neighboring populations, our study has an impact not only on the Tunisian population but also on North African population which are underrepresented in pharmacogenomic studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29652911      PMCID: PMC5898725          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Drug response varies between individuals owing to disease heterogeneity, genetic and environmental factors [1-3]. It depends on absorption and distribution of drug to the targeted receptors and enzymes that further metabolize it and ultimately excrete it from the body [4]. During this process, genetic variation may alter the therapeutic response of an individual [5-7]. Indeed, ethnic diversity plays a major role in drug response variability, which may have an important regulatory aspect that should be also considered during drug development [8]. Consequently, treatment and recommended doses should not be extrapolated from one ethnic group to another [9]. Pharmacogenetic studies explore the genetic impact of the inter-individual variability of drug response, involving both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics [3]. The clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics in therapeutic approaches, aims to optimize specific drug regimens and drug dosage. This, may have a great advantage in, improving clinical outcomes and avoiding major clinical complication such as congestive heart failure, hepatic and renal disorders [10, 11]. During the last years, the incorporation of pharmacogenetic testing in clinical trials has gained interest. This has been facilitated with the advancement in microarray based methods that allows genotyping Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in many samples simultaneously. This method leads to the identification of loci responsible for drug response variability and adverse reactions [12, 13]. Despite the double burden of communicable and non communicable diseases (NCDs) on the health system, some populations like African still remain poorly studied at the pharmacogenetic level. The Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) is one of the diseases which prevalence is increasing dramatically in North Africa. In Tunisia, it affects up to 30% of the population in urban region [14]. MetS is defined by a cluster of multiple metabolic abnormalities, including central obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia and insulin resistance that directly increase the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), other forms of cardiovascular atherosclerotic diseases (CAD), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), and premature death [13, 15]. Until now, there is no effective drug treatment prescribed to manage all components of MetS. Indeed each syndrome component is treated individually, so miscellaneous types of drugs are used in the treatment of this syndrome, including weight losing drugs, antilipemic, antihypertensives and antidiabetics [15]. This strategy is not always reliable; indeed the individuals do not respond equally to the same treatment. Such differences may be due to diverse mean values of quantitative traits or different genotypic frequency distributions of the variants between populations [16]. For instance, many studies have reported the involvement of variants annotated as Very Important Pharmacogene (VIP) variants in the outcome of anticoagulant, oral anti-diabetic [17, 18] and statins [19]. A significant proportion of ethnic variability in the response to coumarin anticoagulant (AVK), prescribed to treat and prevent arterial and venous thromboembolic disorders in MetS, has been attributed to the differential frequencies of variant in CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genes[20, 21]. The diversity of distribution of functional variants, rs9923231 located in VKORC1, rs1799853 and rs1057910 located in CYP2C9, and which are known to influence AVK dose requirement, has been highlighted [21]. These common polymorphisms were shown to confer a high risk towards over-anticoagulation, predisposing the individuals carrying these polymorphisms to hemorrhagic incidents [22]. In addition, a variable response to beta-blockers used in the treatment of hypertension, including propranolol [23], metoprolol, atenolol [24] and clopidogrel [25, 26] was observed in patients of European and African origins which can trigger a stroke [27, 28]. Other serious adverse outcomes of drugs in MetS are reported such as sudden death, bleeding events, myopathy, [2, 20, 27, 29]. All these ADR engender high social and financial burden. Considering the burden of public health, and genetic variability in response to treatment, we have chosen in the present study to characterize the genetic variability of some pharmacogenes involved in the response to drugs used for the treatment of MetS in Tunisia and to compare our results to the worldwide human populations.

Materiel & methods

Study participants and genotyping

A set of 135 Tunisian healthy individuals including; 32 women and 103 men, originating from two regions (the Capital Tunis and the coastal city of Monastir) were genotyped in a previous study [30] using the AffymetrixChip 6.0 genotyping array. Genotyping data were generated after the variants calling performed with R CRLMM package [31]. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institut Pasteur (Tunis, Tunisia-Registration numbers IRB00005445, FWA00010074, and PV09/06, IRB# 0000000044). All participants provided written informed consent.

Selection of very important pharmacogenes and variant

We selected a set of very important pharmacogenes (VIP) involved in MetS components drug response from the PharmGKB database (http://www.pharmgkb.org) which provides an overview of significant genes involved in the metabolism or response to one or several drugs. VIP genes were chosen through extensive review of a variety of sources, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) biomarker list, FDA-approved drug labels with pharmacogenetic information, and Clinical Pharmacogenetic Implementation Consortium (CPIC) nominations [32]. Additionally, we considered a gene as a VIP if it is associated with a large number of variant annotations and having high-level of clinical annotations. Furthermore, genetic variants were chosen from published polymorphisms associated with VIP through an extensive bibliographic search.

Genotyping data

PLINK v2 [33] was used to extract variants of the selected VIP. The genotypic data of individuals from 22 other populations were downloaded from the International HapMap Project phase III (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/hapmap/) and published data [34, 35]. The studied populations included those of (1) African ancestry in the South Western USA (ASW); (2) Northwestern and western European ancestry populations of Utah from the CEPH collection (CEU); (3) Han Chinese in Beijing, China (CHB); (4) Chinese population of metropolitan Denver, Colorado, USA (CHD); (5) Gujarati Indians in Houston, Texas, USA (GIH); (6)Luhya people in Webuye, Kenya (LWK); (7) people of Mexican ancestry living in Los Angeles, California, USA (MEX); (8) Maasai people in Kinyawa, Kenya (MKK); (9) Toscani people of Italy (TSI); and (10)Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria (YRI). Genotypic data from other population mainly from South Europe and North Africa (Algeria (ALG), Egypt (EGY), Libya (LIB), Tunisia Douiret (TN_Ber), Lebanon (LEB), South Morocco (MCS), North Morocco (MCN), Sub-Saharan (SAH), South Spain (SPS), North Spain (SPN) Spain Basc (SBA) were download from the previous published study [16, 35].

Quality control analysis

Genotypic data were managed using the PLINK v2 software. Variants were excluded if they are deviating from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) (p-value < 10−4), minor allele frequency (MAF) < 10−2 and have missed genotyping rate ≥ to 95% for each of the studied populations.

Statistical analysis

To infer cryptic population structure from genomic data, principal component analysis (PCA) based on pruned genotypic data was performed using SNPrelate R package [36]. Cryptic population structure defines a population structure that is difficult to detect using visible characters but may be significant in genetic terms[37, 38]. Indeed, the information about the population origin is given by the study participants. This information is subjectively based on geographic location, physical and cultural characters. The genotypic data and estimated allele frequencies might be used to determine if a given assignment of individuals to a population, based on subjective criteria, mirrors a natural assignment in genetic terms (admixture and gene flow). Genetic data can be useful to determine the cryptic relatedness among populations and to shape the false matches due to the probabilistical assignment of population. In addition, we used PLINK v2, and “rgl” R package [39], to generate multidimensional scaling plot (MDS) and three dimensional MDS (3D MDS) from the same data. The genotype frequencies of the selected VIP in Tunisian population, were calculated and compared with 10 HapMap populations, using SNPassoc R package [40]. In this step of analysis, we have considered only the HapMap project populations due to the complete genotypic data. The inter-ethnic genotypic frequency comparison was performed using the Chi-square test and Bonferroni’s adjustement was applied to the level of significance set at a p-value threshold of 5% devided by the number of studied loci.

Analyses of population genetic structures

Fixation Index (Fst) and Structure are two common analyses in population genetic studies. The R package Hierfstat [41] was used in order to assess the degree of similarity in genetic structure between the different ethnic populations, we calculated pairwise Fst values and evaluate the magnitude of differentiation among geographic populations (0 indicating no divergence, 1 meaning complete separation). Pairwise Fst values between the Tunisian population and the other 10 HapMap populations were calculated. To further investigate variation at the VIP variants in terms of population structure, we used the STRUCTURE ver. 2.3.4 software [38, 42] which is based on the bayesian clustering algorithm to assign the samples within a hypothetical K number of ancestries. We set a range of possible number of clusters ranging from K = 2 to K = 10 and 24 trials were run for each K. The Markov Chain Monte Carlo iteration for each structure analysis was run for 10000 after an initial burn-in period of 10000 steps. In order to assess the most likely number of clusters, we calculated delta K as proposed by Evanno et al. [43]. The similarity of the runs at each K level was evaluated by the CLUMPP software as implemented at the online [44]. The Distruct software was used to visualize the best alignment of subpopulation inferring population substructure and individual assignment across the best runs at each k level [45].

Results

Based on a large bibliographic search and PhamaGKB interrogation, we selected 24 pharmacogenes implicated in MetS components drug response modulation listed in Table 1 including class of drug, drug name, gene name, description and category family of genes, pharmacokinetic phase of drug metabolism, chromosomal localization and the corresponding VIP variant. The studied genes belong to ABC transporters family, cytochrome P450 family and G-coupled receptor family (Table 1). A total of 1056 variant on 24 pharmacogenes were identified in the Tunisian population and kept after quality control steps for subsequent analysis.
Table 1

Basic information of selected pharmacogenes.

Class of DrugDrug nameGenes IDDescriptionCategory FamilyPhaseChrLocalisation of GeneVIP (High evidence level)
AnticagulantClopidogrel (Palvix)ABCB1ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 1ABC transporters superfamilyOther7chr7:87,133,179–87,342,638rs10545642 rs1128503 rs2032582
CYP2D6cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily D member 6Cytochrome P450 superfamilyphaseI22chr22:42126499–42130881rs3892097
CYP2C19cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C member 19Cytochrome P450 superfamilyphaseI10chr10:96,522,438–96,612,962rs1057910 rs4244285
P2RY12purinergic receptor P2Y, G-protein coupled, 12G-protein coupled receptorOther3chr3:151,054,631–151,102,600
AcenocoumarolCYP2C9cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C member 2Cytochrome P450 superfamilyphaseI10chr10:96,698,415–96,749,148rs1057910
VKORC1vitamin K epoxide reductase complex, subunit 1Vitamin K epoxide reductasephaseI16chr16:31,102,163–31,106,320rs9934438 rs7294
AntidiabeticBiguanide/MetformineSLC22A1solute carrier family 22 (organic cation transporter), member 1Organic cation transporteother6chr6:160,542,863–160,579,750
Biguanide/MetformineSLC22A2solute carrier family 22 (organic cation transporter), member 2Organic cation transporteother6chr6:160,637,794–160,679,963
Biguanide/MetformineSLC47A1solute carrier family 47 (multidrug and toxin extrusion), member 1Multidrug and toxin extrusionother17chr17:19,437,167–19,482,346
Biguanide/MetformineSLC47A2solute carrier family 47 (multidrug and toxin extrusion), member 2Multidrug and toxin extrusionotherchr17:19,581,628–19,620,043
Biguanide/MetformineATMATM serine/threonine kinasePhosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related kinase superfamilyOther11chr11:108,093,559–108,239,826rs11212617
TZD/PioglitazonePPARGperoxisome proliferator-activated receptor gammaNuclear receptors superfamilyOther3
TZD/RosiglitazonePGC-1alphaperoxisome proliferative activated receptor, gamma, coactivator 1 alphaNuclear receptors superfamilyOther5chr5:51,454,249–51,553,921rs1801282
TZD/TroglitazoneRETNResitin19chr19:7,669,086–7,670,454
Leptin LEPRleptin receptorCytokine receptors superfamilyOther1chr1:65,420,652–65,635,428
TNFalphaTumor Necrosis FactorTumor necrosis factor receptor31chr6:31,543,344–31,546,112
SulphonylureaKCNJ11potassium channel, inwardly rectifying subfamily J, member 11Potassium channelModifier11chr11:17,406,796–17,410,206rs5215 rs5219 rs757110
ABCC8ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 8ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transportersModifier11chr11:17,414,432–17,498,392
KCNQ1potassium channel, voltage gated KQT-like subfamily Q, member 1Potassium Channel superfamilyOther11chr11:2,466,221–2,870,340
TCF7L2transcription factor 7-like 2 (T-cell specific, HMG-box)DNA-binding proteins.Other10chr10:114,710,009–114,927,436rs12255372
Lipid lowring FenofibrateFlavastatinCYP2C9Cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C member 9Cytochrome P450phaseI10chr10:96,698,415–96,749,148
LovastatinABCB1ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 1ABC transporters superfamilyOther7chr7:87,133,179–87,342,638rs1128503
AtorvastatinABCB1ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 1ABC transporters superfamilyOther7chr7:87,133,179–87,342,638rs2032582,
ABCA1ATP-binding cassette, sub-family A (ABC1), member 1ABC transporters sub-family AOther9chr9:104,781,003–104,928,246rs12003906
CYP2C9Cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C member 9Cytochrome P450phaseI10chr10:96,698,415–96,749,148rs1057910
PPARAPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alphaNuclear hormone receptor superfamily22chr22:46,546,499–46,639,653
SCLO1B1Solute carrier organic anion transporter family, member 1B1Solute carrier familyOtherschr22:46,546,499–46,639,653rs4149056 rs4149081 rs4363657 rs4149015
HMGCR3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductaseHMGCR superfamily5chr5:74,632,993–74,657,926rs17238540 rs3846662 rs17244841
CYP3A5cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A member 5Cytochrome P450 superfamilyPhase I7chr7:99,245,812–99,277,649rs776746

The list of 24 pharmacogenes implicated in MetS components drug response modulation, including class of drug, drug name, gene name, description and category family of genes, pharmacokinetic phase of drug metabolism, chromosomal localization and the corresponding common VIP variant.

The list of 24 pharmacogenes implicated in MetS components drug response modulation, including class of drug, drug name, gene name, description and category family of genes, pharmacokinetic phase of drug metabolism, chromosomal localization and the corresponding common VIP variant. For inter-ethnic genotypic frequency comparison and population structure analyses purposes, we kept 743 shared variants among the 22 worldwide studied populations. The MDS analysis describing the genetic landscape of these pharmacogenes shows a cluster of the Tunisian population with the North African populations (Algeria, Morocco, Egypt …), Tuscan and CEU were distinguished from the Asian and Sub Saharan African populations (Fig 1). This result was further confirmed using PCA analyses (S1 Fig). A great divergence was observed between the Asian populations and LWK (S1 Fig).
Fig 1

Multidimensional scaling plot analysis of the Tunisian subpopulation and worldwide populations.

The plot reveals three distinct clusters showing that the Tunisian population present a close affinity with the North Africans and Europeans and distinct from South Africans and Asians. Tunisian population; Capital Tunis TU_TC, coastal city of Monastir TU_MC (AffymetrixChip 6.0 genotyping array), African ancestry in the south Western USA (ASW); a northwestern European population (CEU); the Han Chinese in Beijing, China (CHB); a Chinese population of metropolitan Denver, Colorado, USA (CHD); the Gujarati Indians in Houston, Texas, USA (GIH); the Japanese population in Tokyo, Japan (JPT); the Luhya people in Webuye, Kenya (LWK); people of Mexican ancestry living in Los Angeles, California, USA (MEX); the Maasai people in Kinyawa, Kenya (MKK); the Tuscan people of Italy (TSI); and the Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria (YRI); data from HapMap were retrived in March 2016. It is available by FTP: ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/hapmap/ and Algeria (ALG), Egyptia (EGY), Libya (LIB), Tunisia Dwiret TUN_Ber, Lebanon (LIB), Morocco South (MCS), Morocco North (MCN), Spain South (SPS), Spain North (SPN), Spain Basc (SBA),: Sub-Saharan (SAH), Canary Island (CIS); data from the literature [34, 35].

Multidimensional scaling plot analysis of the Tunisian subpopulation and worldwide populations.

The plot reveals three distinct clusters showing that the Tunisian population present a close affinity with the North Africans and Europeans and distinct from South Africans and Asians. Tunisian population; Capital Tunis TU_TC, coastal city of Monastir TU_MC (AffymetrixChip 6.0 genotyping array), African ancestry in the south Western USA (ASW); a northwestern European population (CEU); the Han Chinese in Beijing, China (CHB); a Chinese population of metropolitan Denver, Colorado, USA (CHD); the Gujarati Indians in Houston, Texas, USA (GIH); the Japanese population in Tokyo, Japan (JPT); the Luhya people in Webuye, Kenya (LWK); people of Mexican ancestry living in Los Angeles, California, USA (MEX); the Maasai people in Kinyawa, Kenya (MKK); the Tuscan people of Italy (TSI); and the Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria (YRI); data from HapMap were retrived in March 2016. It is available by FTP: ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/hapmap/ and Algeria (ALG), Egyptia (EGY), Libya (LIB), Tunisia Dwiret TUN_Ber, Lebanon (LIB), Morocco South (MCS), Morocco North (MCN), Spain South (SPS), Spain North (SPN), Spain Basc (SBA),: Sub-Saharan (SAH), Canary Island (CIS); data from the literature [34, 35]. Among the 743 variants shared between the studied populations, five clinically relevant VIP variants were identified. Therefore, we performed an inter-ethnic comparison based on their genotypic frequencies. We found that the genotype frequencies of the following variants involved in the anticoagulant sensitivity; rs3846662 (HMGGR), rs1045642 (ABCB1), rs7294 (VKORC1) and rs12255372 (TCF7L2), were similar between the Tunisian population, Tuscany and the European populations (CEU); (p>>0.05/5*10). The genotypic frequencies of the rs776746 variant located in the CYP3A5 gene involved in the hypolipidemic susceptibility are similar between Tunisian and African populations (MKK, LWK, YRI) and significantly different from European (CEU) and Asian (CHD, CHB); (p<<0.05/5*10) (Table 2).
Table 2

Genotype frequency of significant VIP variants in Tunisian population (n = 135) compared with ten HapMap populations.

Gene nameSNP IDFreq.(TUN)*p-values against ten populations after Bonferroni correction
AAABBBCEUTSIASWLWKMKKYRICHBCHDGIHMEX
CYP3A5rs7767460;660;260;081.403e-050.00010.00560.12420.09520.15070.048270.18360.21510.2151
HMGCRrs38466620.290.470.250.45080.81947.205e-122.2e-168.61e-102.2e-160.92710.83830.02260.2502
ABCB1rs10456420.490.330.180.02620.01520.0007-0.00046.802e-060.42460.00660.00660.0002
VKORC1rs72940.650.270.090.09020.00140.00134.081e-073.722e-062.226e-066.742e-050.00050.00010.0013
TCF7L2rs122553720.480.330.190.04870.02640.00710.00710.0236-0.023614.248e-100.00020.0216

Bonferroni correction was applied to the level of significance, which was set at (p.value < 0.05/5*10 = 0.001);p.value > (0.05/5*10) assigned in bold represent differences not statistically significant between Tunisia and the compared population, 0.00 not observed genotypes; -: not successfully genotyped or not compared by chi-square test. TUN* = (TN_Mc/TN_TC), MEX = Mexican ancestry in Los Angeles, California; TSI = Toscans in Italy; LWK = Luhya in Webuye, Kenya; ASW = African ancestry in Southwest USA; GIH = Gujarati Indians in Houston, Texas; MKK = Maasai.

Bonferroni correction was applied to the level of significance, which was set at (p.value < 0.05/5*10 = 0.001);p.value > (0.05/5*10) assigned in bold represent differences not statistically significant between Tunisia and the compared population, 0.00 not observed genotypes; -: not successfully genotyped or not compared by chi-square test. TUN* = (TN_Mc/TN_TC), MEX = Mexican ancestry in Los Angeles, California; TSI = Toscans in Italy; LWK = Luhya in Webuye, Kenya; ASW = African ancestry in Southwest USA; GIH = Gujarati Indians in Houston, Texas; MKK = Maasai. In order to assess the degree of similarity in the genetic structure between the different ethnic populations, we calculated the pairwise Fst values among the Tunisian population and the other 10 HapMap populations ranged from 0.00802 to 0.41201 (Table 3). Comparing Tunisia to other populations, the lowest level of differentiation was observed between the inner and costal part of centeral Tunisia (Fst = 0.01182), followed by the TSI (Fst = 0.02872) and MEX (Fst = 0,0269) populations, whereas the greatest divergence was observed with the LWK population (Fst = 0,35929).
Table 3

Estimating of pairwise Fst among the 11 populations.

TN_TCTN_MCASWCEUCHBCHDGIHLWKMEXMKKTSIYRI
TN_TC0
TN_MC0.011820
ASW0.155530.234780
CEU0.065170.049780.299140
CHB0.022680.023500.217650.097970
CHD0.065460.096020.268640.119890.001790
GIH0.106360.143720.178660.089290.183130.210730
LWK0.245210.320050.027440.355590.273470.329580.224480
MEX0.026910.026350.20410.0314360.046450.064780.085240.273370
MKK0.124470.215360.031730.252030.185010.189240.153480.092030.163980
TSI0.028720.016140.262260.008020.067360.114240.096390.342950.028160.225750
YRI0.275060.359290.017490.412010.325750.371060.292780.002760.322880.084040.386930

The pairwise differences Fst values between 11 populations. Fst value is less than 0.15 represent that there is no genetic differentiation between the two populations. The lowest level of differentiations were found between TN_TC and TN_MC (Fst = 0,01182) followed by the TSI (Fst = 0.02872) and MEX (Fst = 0,0269) populations, whereas the greatest divergence was observed with the LWK population (Fst = 0,35929).

The pairwise differences Fst values between 11 populations. Fst value is less than 0.15 represent that there is no genetic differentiation between the two populations. The lowest level of differentiations were found between TN_TC and TN_MC (Fst = 0,01182) followed by the TSI (Fst = 0.02872) and MEX (Fst = 0,0269) populations, whereas the greatest divergence was observed with the LWK population (Fst = 0,35929). Bayesian-based STRUCTURE analysis (Fig 2) provided complementary methods for visualizing patterns of genetic similarity and differentiation between the Tunisian population and the other 22 populations. According to the Evanno’s ΔK method for STRUCTURE, K = 3 was selected to detect the most likely number of genetic clusters (S2 and S3 Figs). The barplot shows three components: African, Asiatic and European. For the North African populations cluster regrouping (TN_MC, TN_TC, ALG, EGY, MCN, MCS, SAH and LIB), the European; (CEU, TSI, MEX, SPB, SPN, SPS), East African (MKK, LWK, ASW) and Asiatic subgroups (CHD, CHB). This graph demonstrates the predominance of the African and European components. Thus, reflecting that the Tunisian population is a mosaic of different populations which reflects the existence of different gene flows that have influenced genetic variability of the response to treatments.
Fig 2

STRUCTURE analysis of the genetic relationship between 24 populations.

K is the possible numbers of parental population clusters. One color represents one parental population into different color segments. Best K level was observed at K = 3, where a vertical the proportion of each ancestral component in a single individual is represented by a vertical bar divided into 3 colors. 601 markers study—displaying results for runs with highest likelihood out of 27 runs in each cluster K3 to 10. Black vertical lines identify the population boundaries. The height extent of each color within an individual’s color bar corresponds to the estimated membership of the individual in one of the clusters; each cluster is assigned a separate color. The bars with multiple colors can be interpreted as genetic admixture or as relative probabilities of belonging to the different clusters.

STRUCTURE analysis of the genetic relationship between 24 populations.

K is the possible numbers of parental population clusters. One color represents one parental population into different color segments. Best K level was observed at K = 3, where a vertical the proportion of each ancestral component in a single individual is represented by a vertical bar divided into 3 colors. 601 markers study—displaying results for runs with highest likelihood out of 27 runs in each cluster K3 to 10. Black vertical lines identify the population boundaries. The height extent of each color within an individual’s color bar corresponds to the estimated membership of the individual in one of the clusters; each cluster is assigned a separate color. The bars with multiple colors can be interpreted as genetic admixture or as relative probabilities of belonging to the different clusters.

Discussion

In the recent years, the use of pharmacogenomics witnessed important success in the improvement of healthcare by developing therapeutic treatment and predicting individual response [23]. Distribution of VIP variants exerts irreplaceable significance in pharmacogenomics knowledge [25]. In the present study, we showed that some VIP variants involved in MetS drug response, exhibited a great genetic variation among the studied populations, which directly impacts on the delivery of individualized medicine. The ethnicity should be taken into consideration, in routine clinical practice to ensure the efficacy and safety of the drug at the population level [46][47]. Our data confirm that ethnicity, even among close populations plays a significant role in differential distribution of variants implicated in drug response or ADR [46]. In Tunisian population, these variants displayed a close genetic affinity with the North African (ALG, LIB, MCN, MCS), Middle Eastern (EGY, LEB) and European populations (TSI, CEU, SPS, SBA, SPN) but they were distinct from the South Africans and Asians. Our results are in agreement with those of the study of Mizzi C et al, 2016, that used tailored DMET array and compared the generated data of 11 European populations against Saudi Arabian, Asian and South African populations. The study showed that there are no significant differences among the European populations. The great divergence was observed among European, Asian and South African population [46]. Another study of Abdelhedi et al., focused on the CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 variants implicated in the metabolism of anticoagulant response, concluded that Tunisians were similar to Europeans and Middle Easterners with regard to the allelic frequencies [27]. Pairwise Fst values of clinically relevant VIP variants, in our study, also revealed a more similarity between Tunisian, Tuscan and European populations (CEU). This was confirmed with analysis using admixture that showed the heterogeneity of Tunisian population and the contribution of the European, North African components. These observations were also reported on mitochondrial DNA, Y chromosomal and autosomal markers and interpreted as influences from different migration events [34, 48–50]. Obviously, differences in admixture history exert an important impact in the allelic and genotypic distribution of variants at the population level [47]. In the present study, five polymorphisms characterized as clinically relevant VIP variant, were selected, based on previous pharmacogenomics research to be further investigated (S4 Fig). The variant rs7294; 3730 G>A transition located on chromosome 16 in the 3’Untranslated Region (UTR) of VKORC1 gene. This gene encodes the vitamin K epoxide reductase protein, which is a crucial enzyme in vitamin K cycle and therefore involved in inter-individual drug variability of the majority of coumarin derivatives, such as warfarin, acenocoumarol and phenprocoumon which are frequently prescribed as oral anticoagulants to treat and prevent thromboembolism [51]. Because there is a large inter-individual and intra-individual variability in dose-response and a narrow therapeutic window, treatment with coumarin derivatives is challenging. Some polymorphisms in VKORC1 were associated with lower dose requirements and a higher risk of bleeding [52]. Patient with the TT genotype may require an increased dose to attend the curative effect of the anti-coagulant such as phenprocoumon or acenocoumarol as compared to patients with the TC or CC genotypes[53]. The frequency of TT genotype of rs7294 was generally lower in Tunisian population (0.09) than in African populations (MKK, LWK, ASW, YRI) respectively equal to (0.18, 0.28, 0.23) and East Asian populations (CHB, CHD) (0.89, 0.86) and similar to Europeans (CEU, MEX, TSI) (0.13, 0.09, 0.08) and Central Asians (GIH) (0.03) (S1 Table). Indeed, this result suggests that the Tunisians might require a lower dose of acenocoumarol or phenprocoumcon to achieve the therapeutic effect. Thus, the dosage regimen may be optimized on the specific genotypic frequency in Tunisian population. The rs1045642 (A>G) transition is synonymous variant located on ABCB1 (MDR1) gene which is one of many ubiquitous adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding cassette (ABC) genes that is responsible for cellular homeostasis [54, 55]. The ABCB1 C3435T (rs1045642) is extensively studied and some research showed that the ABCB1 C3435T genotype influences the absorption of clopidogrel [56] and is associated with poor clopidogrel response. Conversely, the frequencies of AA and AG genotypes of rs1045642 which respectively equal to (0.49, 0.33), in Tunisian population, were respectively much lower than that are reported in other populations. (S1 Table). In this case, AA and AG genotypes may have an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events such as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, when treated with clopidogrel in people with acute coronary syndrome or myocardial infarction as compared to people with GG genotypes. The rs3846662 located on intron 13 of HMGCR, was associated with differential induction, upon simvastatin exposure, of expression of full-length HMGCR transcript versus alternatively spliced transcript lacking exon 13 (HMGCRv_1). Homozygous individuals A/A exhibit 40% greater induction of full-length transcripts and 20% less alternatively spliced HMGCRv_1 transcript relative to A/G or G/G subjects [57]. These differences may have implications for simvastatin efficacy, since the AA genotype of rs3846662 was associated with the increased induction of the alternatively spliced transcript is correlated with reduced response to simvastatin [57]. For this variant, the Tunisian and European populations were genetically different to the African population (MKK, LWK, YRI) which represented a highly frequencies of the defective AA genotype which consisted respectively to the values of (0.93, 0.71, 0.92). These results mirror that the African populations were more sensitive to the statin treatment than Tunisian population which seems having a response similar to the European (TSI, CEU) (0.35, 0.32) (S1 Table). Rs776746 (C/T) variant located on CYP3A5 gene which is implicated in the biotransformation of the statin drugs, this variant creates a splice site in intron 3, resulting in altered mRNA splicing. The alternatively spliced isoform has an insertion in intron 3, which changes the reading frame and results in a premature termination codon and hences a non-functional protein[58]. Individuals with rs776746 TT genotype are considered to be CYP3A5 poor metabolizes. Indeed, Subjects carrying this genotype have a poor response to lipid lowering drugs such as statin (atorvastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin) [59], consequently they may develop severe muscle damage linked to this inappropriate treatment[60]. The aforementioned variant is the most frequent and well-studied variant allele of CYP3A5. Its frequency varies widely across human populations [61, 62]. In Tunisian population, it was more similar to the Africans (p.value < 0.05/5*10) and differed significantly to the European and Asian population (p.value > 0.05/5*10). The frequency of rs776746 TT in Tunisian and African were low, it ranged between (0.01 to 0.08). Thus, these populations may have similar statin metabolism and will be of great clinical significance in determining future therapeutic approaches. Regarding the variant rs776746, our findings show that Tunisian population has significant similarities with African populations in predicted atorvastatin response. Yet, they display a distinct profile on PCA. This result could be due to the high heterogeneity of the Tunisian genetic structure composed of European, African, and Asian (Near Eastern) components. For this reason, it seems plausible that for some VIP variant, Tunisians are similar to the Europeans and for others, Tunisians are similar to the Africans. As stated in the study of Mizzi C et al,. 2016, the population groups are distinguished according to the results of PCA or admixture analysis using genotyping data. This approach cannot lead to broad generalizations in the application for VIP variants at the individual level. Although, the approaches aiming to identify clinically relevant actionable VIP variants are conducted in small number of variants. Moreover, this result is in agreement with other studies showing that there are multiple pharmacogenomic profiles across African and non African populations which could affect the safety and efficacy of many therapeutic drugs with CYP3A5 substrate [59, 61]. In addition a considerable heterogeneity in North Africa but not in other geographic regions, has been highlighted revealing a selective pressure on CYP3A5 gene [63]. Based on the rich historic background of Tunisia, we suggest that adaptive T allele of rs776746 might have been introduced by a relatively recent gene flow. The intronic variant rs12255372, transition 113049143 G>T located on chromosome 10 of TCF7L2 gene have been thoroughly studied and found to be associated with increased risk of T2DM [64, 65]. The mechanisms by which TCF7L2 affects susceptibility to the disease remain unraveled. Nevertheless, several studies have shown that decreased TCF7L2 protein expression inhibits the insulin secretory response to an oral glucose through impaired incretin action[66]. The GODART study performed on Scottish subjects receiving sulfonylurea, showed an association of rs12255372 risk allele with reduced effect of Sulfonylureas hypoglycemic response [65, 66]. The results revealed that the TT patients undergoing early sulfonylurea treatment had approximately two-fold higher probability to fail the sulfonylureas medication (57% versus 17% for TT versus GG respectively)[65]. Conversely, our study shows that the frequency of Tunisians carriers of rs12255372 TT genotype (0.19) is much lower than TSI, ASW, LWK, MKK and CHB (respectively equal to 0.23, 0.22, 0.22, 0.29, 0.29) and much higher than CEU and MEX (0.07, 0.09). Tunisian population seems to be good responder to Sulfonylureas which should be the first line drug for patients, replacing insulin injections. Genotyping the rs12255372 located in TCF7L2 should be considered when using Sulfonylureas treatment [67]. SNP array designed for the Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) exploited in our study do not allow to fully assess the contributions of variants implicated in MetS drugs response due to the non-uniform coverage of all the chromosomal regions. Indeed, specialised pharmacovariants chip like DMET array increases the power to identify common and rare variations validated for their involvement in drugs metabolism [68-70]. The current clinical pharmacogenomics practice considered that inter-individual drug response variability is mainly based on genetic common variants [1, 3, 46, 47, 71]. For this reason, in our study, we have focused on common variants among Tunisian compared to other populations. Nevertheless, it is well known that rare variants are expected to have more effects on response to drug than common variants because they will not have been subject to purifying selection after the recent expansion of the human population. [72, 73].

Conclusion

The present study showed that Tunisian population is genetically heterogeneous regarding the studied pharmacogenes involved in the response to the MetS components. The allelic and genotypic frequencies do not differ homogenously among the components. This shows the complexity of the genetic components of response to treatment in admixed populations. This study should be extended to other North African population to take into account their peculiarities in order to effectively orient dose and drug prescription to ovoid serious adverse reactions.

Principal component analysis of the Tunisian subpopulation and worldwide populations.

The plot reveals three distinct clusters showing that the Tunisian population present a close affinity with the North Africans and Europeans and distinct from South Africans and Asians. Tunisian population; Capital Tunis TU_TC, coastal city of Monastir TU_MC (AffymetrixChip 6.0 genotyping array), African ancestry in the south Western USA (ASW); a northwestern European population (CEU); the Han Chinese in Beijing, China (CHB); a Chinese population of metropolitan Denver, Colorado, USA (CHD); the Gujarati Indians in Houston, Texas, USA (GIH); the Japanese population in Tokyo, Japan (JPT); the Luhya people in Webuye, Kenya (LWK); people of Mexican ancestry living in Los Angeles, California, USA (MEX); the Maasai people in Kinyawa, Kenya (MKK); the Tuscan people of Italy (TSI); and the Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria (YRI); data from HapMap: ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/hapmap/ and Algeria (ALG), Egyptia (EGY), Libya (LIB), Tunisia Dwiret TUN_Ber, Lebanon (LIB), Morocco South (MCS), Morocco North (MCN), Spain South (SPS), Spain North (SPN), Spain Basc (SBA),: Sub-Saharan (SAH), Canary Island (CIS); data from the literature. (TIFF) Click here for additional data file.

Distruct barplot result.

The figure shows the different bar plots according to the different K number. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Best_K_By_Evanno-Delta K By K graph.

The graph shows the best K equal to 3 according to delta K as proposed by Evanno. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Analysis pipeline.

(TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Genotype frequencies of clinical relevant VIP variant in Tunisia an ten HapMap populations.

The table reveals the similarities or divergences of the Tunisian population to the other studied populations. This table highlight that the genotype frequencies of VIP variants significantly affect a population’s response to a given drug. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  67 in total

Review 1.  Inheritance and drug response.

Authors:  Richard Weinshilboum
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies.

Authors:  Daniel Falush; Matthew Stephens; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A vision for the future of genomics research.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Eric D Green; Alan E Guttmacher; Mark S Guyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure.

Authors:  Mattias Jakobsson; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Surgeon-specific factors affecting treatment decisions among Canadian urologists in the management of pT1a renal tumours.

Authors:  Alexandra Leora Millman; Kenneth T Pace; Michael Ordon; Jason Young Lee
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Pharmacogenetics: practices and opportunities for study design and data analysis.

Authors:  Aiden A Flynn
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 7.851

7.  Landscape of warfarin and clopidogrel pharmacogenetic variants in Qatari population from whole exome datasets.

Authors:  Ambily Sivadas; Parul Sharma; Vinod Scaria
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 8.  Pharmacogenomics: the inherited basis for interindividual differences in drug response.

Authors:  W E Evans; J A Johnson
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.929

9.  Genetic findings and functional studies of human CYP3A5 single nucleotide polymorphisms in different ethnic groups.

Authors:  Su-Jun Lee; Khawja A Usmani; Brian Chanas; Burhan Ghanayem; Tina Xi; Ernest Hodgson; Harvey W Mohrenweiser; Joyce A Goldstein
Journal:  Pharmacogenetics       Date:  2003-08

10.  Common variants in the TCF7L2 gene and predisposition to type 2 diabetes in UK European Whites, Indian Asians and Afro-Caribbean men and women.

Authors:  Steve E Humphries; David Gable; Jackie A Cooper; Helen Ireland; Jeffrey W Stephens; Steven J Hurel; Ka Wah Li; Jutta Palmen; Michelle A Miller; Francesco P Cappuccio; Robert Elkeles; Ian Godsland; George J Miller; Philippa J Talmud
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  "Big Data" Approaches for Prevention of the Metabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Xinping Jiang; Zhang Yang; Shuai Wang; Shuanglin Deng
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 2.  Nonclassical Islet Peptides: Pancreatic and Extrapancreatic Actions.

Authors:  Andrew English; Nigel Irwin
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2019-12-12

3.  African Pharmacogenomics Consortium: Consolidating pharmacogenomics knowledge, capacity development and translation in Africa: Consolidating pharmacogenomics knowledge, capacity development and translation in Africa.

Authors:  Collet Dandara; Collen Masimirembwa; Yosr Z Haffani; Bernhards Ogutu; Jenniffer Mabuka; Eleni Aklillu; Oluseye Bolaji
Journal:  AAS Open Res       Date:  2019-06-04

4.  A map of copy number variations in the Tunisian population: a valuable tool for medical genomics in North Africa.

Authors:  Lilia Romdhane; Nessrine Mezzi; Hamza Dallali; Olfa Messaoud; Jingxuan Shan; Khalid A Fakhro; Rym Kefi; Lotfi Chouchane; Sonia Abdelhak
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 8.617

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.