Literature DB >> 29651791

A Discrete Event Simulation Model to Assess the Economic Value of a Hypothetical Pharmacogenomics Test for Statin-Induced Myopathy in Patients Initiating a Statin in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention.

Dominic Mitchell1,2, Jason R Guertin3,4, Anick Dubois1,5,6, Marie-Pierre Dubé1,5,6, Jean-Claude Tardif1,5,6, Ange Christelle Iliza1,2, Fiorella Fanton-Aita1,2, Alexis Matteau1,2,7, Jacques LeLorier8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Statin (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor) therapy is the mainstay dyslipidemia treatment and reduces the risk of a cardiovascular (CV) event (CVE) by up to 35%. However, adherence to statin therapy is poor. One reason patients discontinue statin therapy is musculoskeletal pain and the associated risk of rhabdomyolysis. Research is ongoing to develop a pharmacogenomics (PGx) test for statin-induced myopathy as an alternative to the current diagnosis method, which relies on creatine kinase levels. The potential economic value of a PGx test for statin-induced myopathy is unknown.
METHODS: We developed a lifetime discrete event simulation (DES) model for patients 65 years of age initiating a statin after a first CVE consisting of either an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or a stroke. The model evaluates the potential economic value of a hypothetical PGx test for diagnosing statin-induced myopathy. We have assessed the model over the spectrum of test sensitivity and specificity parameters.
RESULTS: Our model showed that a strategy with a perfect PGx test had an incremental cost-utility ratio of 4273 Canadian dollars ($Can) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The probabilistic sensitivity analysis shows that when the payer willingness-to-pay per QALY reaches $Can12,000, the PGx strategy is favored in 90% of the model simulations.
CONCLUSION: We found that a strategy favoring patients staying on statin therapy is cost effective even if patients maintained on statin are at risk of rhabdomyolysis. Our results are explained by the fact that statins are highly effective in reducing the CV risk in patients at high CV risk, and this benefit largely outweighs the risk of rhabdomyolysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29651791     DOI: 10.1007/s40291-018-0323-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther        ISSN: 1177-1062            Impact factor:   4.074


  39 in total

1.  Two cases of rhabdomyolysis associated with high-dose simvastatin.

Authors:  Maryann Z Skrabal; Julie A Stading; Carrie A Cannella; Michael S Monaghan
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 2.637

2.  ACC/AHA/NHLBI clinical advisory on the use and safety of statins.

Authors:  Richard C Pasternak; Sidney C Smith; C Noel Bairey-Merz; Scott M Grundy; James I Cleeman; Claude Lenfant
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  The concept of the 'percent wasted patients' in preventive health strategies.

Authors:  Héloise Cardinal; Amir Abbas Tahami Monfared; Marc Dorais; Jacques Lelorier
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Cost-effectiveness of the use of low- and high-potency statins in people at low cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Jon Conly; Fiona Clement; Marcello Tonelli; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Scott Klarenbach; Anita Lloyd; Finlay A McAlister; Don Husereau; Natasha Wiebe; Flora Au; Braden Manns
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Statin-induced myopathy: a review and update.

Authors:  Thura T Abd; Terry A Jacobson
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.250

Review 6.  Effects of statins on skeletal muscle: a perspective for physical therapists.

Authors:  Stephanie L Di Stasi; Toran D MacLeod; Joshua D Winters; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-08-05

7.  Incidence of hospitalized rhabdomyolysis in patients treated with lipid-lowering drugs.

Authors:  David J Graham; Judy A Staffa; Deborah Shatin; Susan E Andrade; Stephanie D Schech; Lois La Grenade; Jerry H Gurwitz; K Arnold Chan; Michael J Goodman; Richard Platt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  2012 update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult.

Authors:  Todd J Anderson; Jean Grégoire; Robert A Hegele; Patrick Couture; G B John Mancini; Ruth McPherson; Gordon A Francis; Paul Poirier; David C Lau; Steven Grover; Jacques Genest; André C Carpentier; Robert Dufour; Milan Gupta; Richard Ward; Lawrence A Leiter; Eva Lonn; Dominic S Ng; Glen J Pearson; Gillian M Yates; James A Stone; Ehud Ur
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  Statin-induced rhabdomyolysis in patient with renal failure and underlying undiagnosed hypothyroidism.

Authors:  Sachinkumar N Ambapkar; Naresh Shetty; Arpita Dwivedy; Harshad Onkarrao Malve
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-05

10.  Economic Evaluation of a Pharmacogenomics Test for Statin-Induced Myopathy in Cardiovascular High-Risk Patients Initiating a Statin.

Authors:  Dominic Mitchell; Jason R Guertin; Ange Christelle Iliza; Fiorella Fanton-Aita; Jacques LeLorier
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.074

View more
  5 in total

1.  Value of a Hypothetical Pharmacogenomic Test for the Diagnosis of Statin-Induced Myopathy in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk.

Authors:  Dominic Mitchell; Jason R Guertin; Jacques LeLorier
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  Efficacy of Letrozole Combined with Urinary Gonadotropin for Ovulation Induction in Endocrine Abnormal Infertility Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center, Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Hao Peng; Ben Yuan; Junbiao Mao; Junling Wang; Shuhong Luo
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.809

3.  Systematic review of the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics-guided treatment for cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Ye Zhu; Kristi M Swanson; Ricardo L Rojas; Zhen Wang; Jennifer L St Sauver; Sue L Visscher; Larry J Prokop; Suzette J Bielinski; Liewei Wang; Richard Weinshilboum; Bijan J Borah
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  A Cost-Consequence Analysis of Preemptive SLCO1B1 Testing for Statin Myopathy Risk Compared to Usual Care.

Authors:  Charles A Brunette; Olivia M Dong; Jason L Vassy; Morgan E Danowski; Nicholas Alexander; Ashley A Antwi; Kurt D Christensen
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-10-31

5.  On the Use of Markov Models in Pharmacoeconomics: Pros and Cons and Implications for Policy Makers.

Authors:  Andrea Carta; Claudio Conversano
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-10-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.