Literature DB >> 30218425

Value of a Hypothetical Pharmacogenomic Test for the Diagnosis of Statin-Induced Myopathy in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk.

Dominic Mitchell1,2, Jason R Guertin3,4, Jacques LeLorier5,6.   

Abstract

We recently conducted two economic evaluations of a hypothetical pharmacogenomic test for statin-induced myopathy (SIM) in patients at high cardiovascular risk. Although the models differed in modeling technique and data inputs, both yielded similar results. We believe our approach to assessing the economic value of a diagnostic test was highly advantageous as it characterized the complete range of false-negative and false-positive test outcomes. We used a broad interpretation of test parameters that reflected physician and patient behavioral responses to the test results and accounted for patient adherence to treatment. Both economic evaluations indicated that a highly accurate pharmacogenomic test for SIM would provide a positive incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) for a provincial payer in Canada. However, the value of the test would depend on its ability to accurately diagnose patients when they experience musculoskeletal pain symptoms and guide patients with a test result indicating no SIM to adhere to treatment. Interestingly, our results indicated that a highly inaccurate test would still yield a positive INMB. We found this surprising result was driven by the imbalance of the risk of cardiovascular events outweighing the risk of rhabdomyolysis in patients at high cardiovascular risk. A highly accurate pharmacogenomic test for SIM in patients at high cardiovascular risk would provide economic value for payers. However, the economic and clinical value of the test would depend on the credibility of the test results and their success in influencing patients without SIM to adhere to therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30218425     DOI: 10.1007/s40291-018-0356-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther        ISSN: 1177-1062            Impact factor:   4.074


  58 in total

1.  ACC/AHA/NHLBI clinical advisory on the use and safety of statins.

Authors:  Richard C Pasternak; Sidney C Smith; C Noel Bairey-Merz; Scott M Grundy; James I Cleeman; Claude Lenfant
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Statin myotoxicity: a review of genetic susceptibility factors.

Authors:  M Needham; F L Mastaglia
Journal:  Neuromuscul Disord       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 4.296

Review 3.  A principled approach to setting optimal diagnostic thresholds: where ROC and indifference curves meet.

Authors:  R John Irwin; Timothy C Irwin
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.487

4.  Paying for personalized care: cancer biomarkers and comparative effectiveness.

Authors:  Rahber Thariani; David L Veenstra; Josh J Carlson; Louis P Garrison; Scott Ramsey
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 5.  Statin-induced myopathy: a review and update.

Authors:  Thura T Abd; Terry A Jacobson
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.250

Review 6.  Effects of statins on skeletal muscle: a perspective for physical therapists.

Authors:  Stephanie L Di Stasi; Toran D MacLeod; Joshua D Winters; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-08-05

Review 7.  2012 update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult.

Authors:  Todd J Anderson; Jean Grégoire; Robert A Hegele; Patrick Couture; G B John Mancini; Ruth McPherson; Gordon A Francis; Paul Poirier; David C Lau; Steven Grover; Jacques Genest; André C Carpentier; Robert Dufour; Milan Gupta; Richard Ward; Lawrence A Leiter; Eva Lonn; Dominic S Ng; Glen J Pearson; Gillian M Yates; James A Stone; Ehud Ur
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 8.  Statin pharmacogenomics: pursuing biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Joseph P Kitzmiller; Philip F Binkley; Saurabh R Pandey; Adam M Suhy; Damiano Baldassarre; Katherine Hartmann
Journal:  Discov Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.970

Review 9.  Economic evaluation of targeted cancer interventions: critical review and recommendations.

Authors:  Elena B Elkin; Deborah A Marshall; Nathalie A Kulin; Ilia L Ferrusi; Michael J Hassett; Uri Ladabaum; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Economic Evaluation of a Pharmacogenomics Test for Statin-Induced Myopathy in Cardiovascular High-Risk Patients Initiating a Statin.

Authors:  Dominic Mitchell; Jason R Guertin; Ange Christelle Iliza; Fiorella Fanton-Aita; Jacques LeLorier
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.074

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.