Literature DB >> 29650178

The effective needle stick injury prevention strategies for nursing students in the clinical settings: a literature review.

Hanny Handiyani1, L Meily Kurniawidjaja2, Dewi Irawaty3, Rita Damayanti2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Nursing students are prone to needle stick injuries (NSIs) during their practice in the hospitals. This study aimed to identify the effective NSI prevention strategies for nursing students in the clinical settings.
METHOD: Literature review was performed using the databases of ScienceDirect, ProQuest, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL, SpringerLink, JSTOR, and PubMed. The search terms of "nursing students", "NSI incidents", "prevention", and "clinical settings" were entered, generating 103 articles published between 1991 and 2015.
RESULTS: Our study demonstrated the high rates of NSIs in low- and middle (India, 91.85%). and high-income countries (Taiwan, 56.00%). Most injuries especially occurred when students opening the ampules (53.15%) and performing intravenous cannulation (44.50%). Our review identified four main strategies to prevent NSIs; education, trainings, safe needle use, and effective communication. Our study suggested the development of education and trainings curriculum and self- report system and culture, the provision of financial, material and manpower resources to support the prevention of NSIs.
CONCLUSIONS: four main strategies to prevent NSIs were education, trainings, safe needle use and effective communication. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: collaboration of hospitals and educational institutions is essential to develop effective NSI prevention programs.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Needle stick injury; Nursing student; Prevention; Strategy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29650178     DOI: 10.1016/S1130-8621(18)30060-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Enferm Clin        ISSN: 1130-8621


  2 in total

1.  Needlestick and sharps injuries in an Indonesian tertiary teaching hospital from 2014 to 2017: a cohort study.

Authors:  Evy Yunihastuti; Dewi Mira Ratih; Matdoan Rifkiah Aisyah; Ainum Jhariah Hidayah; Alvina Widhani; Andri Sanityoso Sulaiman; Teguh Harjono Karjadi; Czeresna Heriawan Soejono
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Strengths and Weaknesses in the Risk Management of Blood-Borne Infections: Qualitative Research in Public Health.

Authors:  Anita Gębska Kuczerowska; Artur Błoński; Joanna Kuczerowska; Robert Gajda
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.