Literature DB >> 29649900

In Vitro Comparison of a Novel Single Probe Dual-Energy Lithotripter to Current Devices.

Evan C Carlos1, Daniel A Wollin1, Brenton B Winship1, Ruiyang Jiang1, Daniela Radvak2, Ben H Chew3,4, Michael R Gustafson2, W Neal Simmons2, Pei Zhong2, Glenn M Preminger1, Michael E Lipkin1,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The LithoClast Trilogy is a novel single probe, dual-energy lithotripter with ultrasonic (US) vibration and electromagnetic impact forces. ShockPulse and LithoClast Select are existing lithotripters that also use a combination of US and mechanical impact energies. We compared the efficacy and tip motion of these devices in an in vitro setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Begostones, in the ratio 15:3, were used in all trials. Test groups were Trilogy, ShockPulse, Select ultrasound (US) only, and Select ultrasound with pneumatic (USP). For clearance testing, a single investigator facile with each lithotripter fragmented 10 stones per device. For drill testing, a hands-free apparatus with a submerged balance was used to apply 1 or 2 lbs of pressure on a stone in contact with the device tip. High-speed photography was used to assess Trilogy and ShockPulse's probe tip motion.
RESULTS: Select-USP was slowest and Trilogy fastest on clearance testing (p < 0.01). On 1 lbs drill testing, Select-US was slowest (p = 0.001). At 2 lbs, ShockPulse was faster than Select US (p = 0.027), but did not significantly outpace Trilogy nor Select-USP. At either weight, there was no significant difference between Trilogy and ShockPulse. During its US function, Trilogy's maximum downward tip displacement was 0.041 mm relative to 0.0025 mm with ShockPulse. Trilogy had 0.25 mm of maximum downward displacement during its impactor function while ShockPulse had 0.01 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Single probe dual-energy devices, such as Trilogy and ShockPulse, represent the next generation of lithotripters. Trilogy more efficiently cleared stone than currently available devices, which could be explained by its larger probe diameter and greater downward tip displacement during both US and impactor functions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ShockPulse; Trilogy; lithotripter; nephrolithotomy; percutaneous

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29649900     DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of stone elimination capacity and drilling speed of endoscopic clearance lithotripsy devices.

Authors:  Maximilian Eisel; Markus J Bader; Frank Strittmatter; Udo Nagele; Christian G Stief; Thomas Pongratz; Ronald Sroka
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Stone clearance times with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Comparison of a 1.5 mm ballistic/ultrasonic mini-probe vs. laser.

Authors:  Brennan Timm; Matthew Farag; Niall F Davis; David Webb; David Angus; Andrew Troy; Damien Bolton; Gregory S Jack
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Clinical application of the therapeutic ultrasound in urologic disease: Part II of therapeutic ultrasound in urology.

Authors:  Minh-Tung Do; Tam Hoai Ly; Min Joo Choi; Sung Yong Cho
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-05-16

4.  Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Tomas Andri Axelsson; Cecilia Cracco; Mahesh Desai; Mudhar Nazar Hasan; Thomas Knoll; Emanuele Montanari; Daniel Pérez-Fentes; Michael Straub; Kay Thomas; James C Williams; Marianne Brehmer; Palle J S Osther
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  An ex-vivo assessment of a new single probe triple modality (Trilogy) lithotripter.

Authors:  Charles Joseph O'Connor; Donnacha Hogan; Lee Chien Yap; Louise Lyons; Derek Barry Hennessey
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.661

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.