| Literature DB >> 29649328 |
Hiromi Saito1, Atsuhiro Hirayama1, Takeji Umemura1, Satoru Joshita1, Kenji Mukawa2, Tomoaki Suga1, Eiji Tanaka1, Masao Ota1.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) consists of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Natural killer cell responses play a crucial role in autoimmune disease through innate immunity, in which killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) are closely involved. Although the genetic combination of KIRs with their specific HLA class I ligands has been associated with IBD in Caucasians, such KIR-HLA receptor-ligand combinations are not fully understood in the Japanese. We investigated 14 KIR genes along with HLA-Bw and -C ligands in 90 patients with UC and 50 patients with CD and compared them with the characteristics of 325 healthy control subjects. The frequency of HLA-Bw4 was significantly increased in patients with UC (P = 1.3 × 10-6; odds ratio [OR] = 3.39) and CD (P = 0.0065; OR = 2.32) versus controls. The UC group had a significantly higher frequency of KIR2DS3 (P = 0.024; OR = 1.94) and lower frequency of KIR2DS4 (P = 0.019; OR = 0.40) and KIR2DL1-HLA-C2 (P = 0.035; OR = 0.47). The Tel-A/B haplotype was significantly decreased in UC patients (P = 0.0056; OR = 0.49). The frequency of KIR3DL1-HLA-Bw4 was significantly higher in patients with UC (P = 4.3 × 10-6; OR = 3.12) and CD (P = 0.0067; OR = 2.30). In conclusion, HLA-Bw4 and KIR-HLA pairs may play an important role in the genetic susceptibility to IBD in the Japanese.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29649328 PMCID: PMC5897008 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195778
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Associations of HLA-Bw4, HLA-C1, and HLA-C2 ligands with KIR in UC, CD, and control subjects.
| HLA | UC | CD | Controls | UC vs. Controls | CD vs. Controls | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||||||
| Bw4 | 65 (72%) | 32 (64%) | 141 (43%) | 1.3 ×10−6 | 3.39 (2.04–5.65) | 0.0065 | 2.32 (1.25–4.30) |
| C1 | 90 (100%) | 49 (98%) | 320 (98%) | 0.52 | - | 0.72 | - |
| C2 | 11 (12%) | 8 (16%) | 68 (21%) | 0.063 | 0.53 (0.27–1.04) | 0.54 | - |
Data are expressed as n (%). OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.
Frequency of each KIR gene in 90 patients with UC, 50 patients with CD, and 325 healthy subjects.
| KIR | UC | CD | Controls | UC vs. Controls | CD vs. Controls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2DL1 | 90 (100%) | 50 (100%) | 325 (100%) | - | - |
| 2DL2 | 11 (12%) | 10 (20%) | 47 (15%) | 0.588 | 0.310 |
| 2DL3 | 88 (98%) | 49 (98%) | 324 (100%) | 0.232 | 0.626 |
| 2DL4 | 89 (99%) | 49 (98%) | 324 (100%) | 0.909 | 0.626 |
| 2DL5 | 34 (38%) | 22 (44%) | 131 (40%) | 0.664 | 0.621 |
| 2DS1 | 34 (38%) | 23 (46%) | 129 (40%) | 0.742 | 0.398 |
| 2DS2 | 12 (13%) | 11 (22%) | 53 (16%) | 0.492 | 0.319 |
| 2DS3 | 21 (23%) | 11 (22%) | 44 (14%) | 0.024 | 0.115 |
| 2DS4 | 79 (88%) | 49 (98%) | 308 (95%) | 0.019 | 0.522 |
| 2DS5 | 21 (23%) | 14 (28%) | 93 (29%) | 0.320 | 0.929 |
| 3DL1 | 83 (92%) | 49 (98%) | 309 (95%) | 0.295 | 0.576 |
| 3DL2 | 90 (100%) | 50 (100%) | 325 (100%) | - | - |
| 3DL3 | 90 (100%) | 50 (100%) | 325 (100%) | - | - |
| 3DS1 | 33 (37%) | 18 (36%) | 136 (42%) | 0.195 | 0.270 |
Data are presented as total number (%).
Frequency of centromeric and telomeric KIR haplotypes in UC, CD, and control subjects.
| UC | CD | Controls | UC vs. Controls | CD vs. Controls | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | ||||||
| Centromeric | ||||||
| Cen-A/A | 77 (86%) | 38 (76%) | 272 (84%) | 0.67 | 0.18 | |
| Cen-A/B | 11 (12%) | 11 (22%) | 53 (16%) | 0.34 | 0.32 | |
| Cen-B/B | 2 (2%) | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 0.067 | 0.28 | |
| Telomeric | ||||||
| Tel-A/A | 55 (61%) | 27 (54%) | 166 (51%) | 0.091 | 1.51 (0.93–2.42) | 0.70 |
| Tel-A/B | 24 (27%) | 22 (44%) | 139 (43%) | 0.0056 | 0.49 (0.29–0.82) | 0.87 |
| Tel-B/B | 11 (12%) | 1 (2%) | 20 (6%) | 0.053 | 2.12 (0.98–4.61) | 0.39 |
Data are expressed as n (%). OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.
Frequency of KIR-HLA combinations in UC, CD, and control subjects.
| KIR-HLA | UC | CD | Controls | UC vs. Controls | CD vs. Controls | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||||||
| 3DL1-Bw4 | 62 (69%) | 31 (62%) | 135 (42%) | 4.3×10−6 | 3.12 (1.89–5.13) | 0.0067 | 2.30 (1.24–4.24) |
| 3DS1-Bw4 | 22 (24%) | 11 (22%) | 50 (15%) | 0.045 | 1.78 (1.01–3.14) | 0.24 | - |
| 2DL1-C2 | 10 (11%) | 8 (16%) | 68 (21%) | 0.035 | 0.47 (0.23–0.96) | 0.42 | - |
| 2DS1-C2 | 5 (6%) | 4 (8%) | 26 (8%) | 0.57 | - | 0.78 | - |
| 2DL2-C1 | 11 (12%) | 10 (20%) | 47 (14%) | 0.59 | - | 0.31 | - |
| 2DL3-C1 | 89 (99%) | 49 (98%) | 324 (100%) | 0.91 | - | 0.63 | - |
| 2DS2-C1 | 12 (13%) | 11 (22%) | 53 (16%) | 0.49 | - | 0.32 | - |