Literature DB >> 29649039

Barriers to Rehabilitation Care in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Bryce Noblitt1, Kristan P Alfonso, Margaret Adkins, Matthew L Bush.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess barriers to rehabilitation care for pediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional questionnaire study.
SETTING: Tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Parents of children who received a CI from October 1996 to June 2013. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Factors related to access to and barriers in audiology and speech therapy services, factors related to CI use, and performance with CI using the Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children (PEACH).
RESULTS: Thirty-five parents participated in the study (21 rural residents and 14 urban residents). Distance was a significant barrier to audiology services for rural participants compared with urban participants (p = 0.01). Consistent CI use was complicated by mechanical complications or malfunction in 70% of rural children compared with 33% of urban children (p = 0.05). Only 10% of rural children were able to access speech therapy services at diagnosis compared with 42% of urban children (p = 0.04). Low socioeconomic (SES) status and Medicaid insurance were associated with a lack of local speech therapists and medical/mechanical CI complications. Higher parental educational attainment was associated with higher PEACH scores in quiet conditions compared with families with lower parental education (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Rural children are often delayed in receipt of CI rehabilitation services. Multiple barriers including low SES, insurance type, and parental education can affect utilization of these services and may impact the recipient language development. Close follow-up and efforts to expand access to care are needed to maximize CI benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29649039      PMCID: PMC5940514          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  23 in total

1.  Demographic factors influencing educational placement of the hearing-impaired child with a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Noam Yehudai; Naama Tzach; Talma Shpak; Tova Most; Michal Luntz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Lack of financial barriers to pediatric cochlear implantation: impact of socioeconomic status on access and outcomes.

Authors:  David T Chang; Alvin B Ko; Gail S Murray; James E Arnold; Cliff A Megerian
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-07

3.  Project ASPIRE: Spoken Language Intervention Curriculum for Parents of Low-socioeconomic Status and Their Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children.

Authors:  Dana L Suskind; Eileen Graf; Kristin R Leffel; Marc W Hernandez; Elizabeth Suskind; Robert Webber; Sally Tannenbaum; Mary Ellen Nevins
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Language outcomes for children with cochlear implants enrolled in different communication programs.

Authors:  Ennur Yanbay; Louise Hickson; Nerina Scarinci; Gabriella Constantinescu; Shani J Dettman
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2014-05

5.  Language skills of children with early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Johanna G Nicholas; Allison L Sedey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Influence of implantation age on school-age language performance in pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Emily A Tobey; Donna Thal; John K Niparko; Laurie S Eisenberg; Alexandra L Quittner; Nae-Yuh Wang
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Developmental effects of family environment on outcomes in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Rachael Frush Holt; Jessica Beer; William G Kronenberger; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Ensuring the long-term use of cochlear implants in children: the importance of engaging local resources and expertise.

Authors:  Sue Archbold; Gerard M O'Donoghue
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Timing discrepancies of early intervention hearing services in urban and rural cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Matthew L Bush; Mary Burton; Ashley Loan; Jennifer B Shinn
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Performance of Indian Children with Cochlear Implant on PEACH Scale.

Authors:  Suman Kumar; Nachiketa Rout; Navnit Kumar; Indranil Chatterjee; H Selvakumaran
Journal:  ISRN Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-04
View more
  10 in total

1.  Identification of Potential Barriers to Timely Access to Pediatric Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Lisa Zhang; Anne R Links; Emily F Boss; Alicia White; Jonathan Walsh
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 2.  Evaluating Equity Through the Social Determinants of Hearing Health.

Authors:  Marissa R Schuh; Matthew L Bush
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 3.562

3.  Risk Factors for Operating Room No-Show in an Academic Otolaryngology Practice.

Authors:  Skylar Trott; Rory Young; Christopher Hayden; Olivia Yessin; Matthew Bush; Nikita Gupta
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.970

Review 4.  Conversations in Cochlear Implantation: The Inner Ear Therapy of Today.

Authors:  Grant Rauterkus; Anne K Maxwell; Jacob B Kahane; Jennifer J Lentz; Moises A Arriaga
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-04-29

5.  Identifying barriers and considerations for cochlear implantation in Amish children.

Authors:  Rachel Whelan; Jennifer L McCoy; Mahmoud Omar; David H Chi
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 1.808

6.  Feasibility of community health workers as teleaudiology patient-site facilitators: a multilevel training study.

Authors:  Laura Coco; Rosie Piper; Nicole Marrone
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.437

Review 7.  Defining Disparities in Cochlear Implantation through the Social Determinants of Health.

Authors:  Marissa Schuh; Matthew L Bush
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2021-12-09

Review 8.  Barriers to Adult Cochlear Implant Care in the United States: An Analysis of Health Care Delivery.

Authors:  Ashley M Nassiri; John P Marinelli; Donna L Sorkin; Matthew L Carlson
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2021-12-09

9.  Implementation Strategy for Highly-Coordinated Cochlear Implant Care With Remote Programming: The Complete Cochlear Implant Care Model.

Authors:  Ashley M Nassiri; Aniket A Saoji; Melissa D DeJong; Nicole M Tombers; Colin L W Driscoll; Brian A Neff; David S Haynes; Matthew L Carlson
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 2.619

10.  Cochlear Implantation in Infants: Why and How.

Authors:  Patricia L Purcell; Nicholas L Deep; Susan B Waltzman; J Thomas Roland; Sharon L Cushing; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.