Literature DB >> 29644456

Genetic background effects in quantitative genetics: gene-by-system interactions.

Maria Sardi1,2, Audrey P Gasch3,4.   

Abstract

Proper cell function depends on networks of proteins that interact physically and functionally to carry out physiological processes. Thus, it seems logical that the impact of sequence variation in one protein could be significantly influenced by genetic variants at other loci in a genome. Nonetheless, the importance of such genetic interactions, known as epistasis, in explaining phenotypic variation remains a matter of debate in genetics. Recent work from our lab revealed that genes implicated from an association study of toxin tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae show extensive interactions with the genetic background: most implicated genes, regardless of allele, are important for toxin tolerance in only one of two tested strains. The prevalence of background effects in our study adds to other reports of widespread genetic-background interactions in model organisms. We suggest that these effects represent many-way interactions with myriad features of the cellular system that vary across classes of individuals. Such gene-by-system interactions may influence diverse traits and require new modeling approaches to accurately represent genotype-phenotype relationships across individuals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofuels; Epistasis; Genetic architecture; Quantitative genetics; Stress tolerance

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29644456     DOI: 10.1007/s00294-018-0835-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Genet        ISSN: 0172-8083            Impact factor:   3.886


  32 in total

1.  The tails of ubiquitin precursors are ribosomal proteins whose fusion to ubiquitin facilitates ribosome biogenesis.

Authors:  D Finley; B Bartel; A Varshavsky
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-03-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants.

Authors:  A H Tong; M Evangelista; A B Parsons; H Xu; G D Bader; N Pagé; M Robinson; S Raghibizadeh; C W Hogue; H Bussey; B Andrews; M Tyers; C Boone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Network analysis of GWAS data.

Authors:  Mark D M Leiserson; Jonathan V Eldridge; Sohini Ramachandran; Benjamin J Raphael
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 5.578

4.  eSGA: E. coli synthetic genetic array analysis.

Authors:  Gareth Butland; Mohan Babu; J Javier Díaz-Mejía; Fedyshyn Bohdana; Sadhna Phanse; Barbara Gold; Wenhong Yang; Joyce Li; Alla G Gagarinova; Oxana Pogoutse; Hirotada Mori; Barry L Wanner; Henry Lo; Jas Wasniewski; Constantine Christopolous; Mehrab Ali; Pascal Venn; Anahita Safavi-Naini; Natalie Sourour; Simone Caron; Ja-Yeon Choi; Ludovic Laigle; Anaies Nazarians-Armavil; Avnish Deshpande; Sarah Joe; Kirill A Datsenko; Natsuko Yamamoto; Brenda J Andrews; Charles Boone; Huiming Ding; Bilal Sheikh; Gabriel Moreno-Hagelseib; Jack F Greenblatt; Andrew Emili
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  The genetic landscape of a cell.

Authors:  Michael Costanzo; Anastasia Baryshnikova; Jeremy Bellay; Yungil Kim; Eric D Spear; Carolyn S Sevier; Huiming Ding; Judice L Y Koh; Kiana Toufighi; Sara Mostafavi; Jeany Prinz; Robert P St Onge; Benjamin VanderSluis; Taras Makhnevych; Franco J Vizeacoumar; Solmaz Alizadeh; Sondra Bahr; Renee L Brost; Yiqun Chen; Murat Cokol; Raamesh Deshpande; Zhijian Li; Zhen-Yuan Lin; Wendy Liang; Michaela Marback; Jadine Paw; Bryan-Joseph San Luis; Ermira Shuteriqi; Amy Hin Yan Tong; Nydia van Dyk; Iain M Wallace; Joseph A Whitney; Matthew T Weirauch; Guoqing Zhong; Hongwei Zhu; Walid A Houry; Michael Brudno; Sasan Ragibizadeh; Balázs Papp; Csaba Pál; Frederick P Roth; Guri Giaever; Corey Nislow; Olga G Troyanskaya; Howard Bussey; Gary D Bader; Anne-Claude Gingras; Quaid D Morris; Philip M Kim; Chris A Kaiser; Chad L Myers; Brenda J Andrews; Charles Boone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Epistasis and its implications for personal genetics.

Authors:  Jason H Moore; Scott M Williams
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Epistasis Is a Major Determinant of the Additive Genetic Variance in Mimulus guttatus.

Authors:  Patrick J Monnahan; John K Kelly
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  High-throughput, quantitative analyses of genetic interactions in E. coli.

Authors:  Athanasios Typas; Robert J Nichols; Deborah A Siegele; Michael Shales; Sean R Collins; Bentley Lim; Hannes Braberg; Natsuko Yamamoto; Rikiya Takeuchi; Barry L Wanner; Hirotada Mori; Jonathan S Weissman; Nevan J Krogan; Carol A Gross
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 9.  Data and theory point to mainly additive genetic variance for complex traits.

Authors:  William G Hill; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  A global analysis of genetic interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Alexandra B Byrne; Matthew T Weirauch; Victoria Wong; Martina Koeva; Scott J Dixon; Joshua M Stuart; Peter J Roy
Journal:  J Biol       Date:  2007-09-26
View more
  4 in total

1.  Homeostatic plasticity fails at the intersection of autism-gene mutations and a novel class of common genetic modifiers.

Authors:  Özgür Genç; Joon-Yong An; Richard D Fetter; Yelena Kulik; Giulia Zunino; Stephan J Sanders; Graeme W Davis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 2.  Stress modulation as a means to improve yeasts for lignocellulose bioconversion.

Authors:  B A Brandt; T Jansen; H Volschenk; J F Görgens; W H Van Zyl; R Den Haan
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Circuit diversification in a biofilm regulatory network.

Authors:  Manning Y Huang; Carol A Woolford; Gemma May; C Joel McManus; Aaron P Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 6.823

4.  Parallel evolution between genomic segments of seasonal human influenza viruses reveals RNA-RNA relationships.

Authors:  Jennifer E Jones; Valerie Le Sage; Gabriella H Padovani; Michael Calderon; Erik S Wright; Seema S Lakdawala
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 8.140

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.