| Literature DB >> 29644087 |
Yong-Xiong Pan1, Guang-Gang Yang1, Zhong-Wan Li1, Zhong-Min Shi2, Zhan-Dong Sun1.
Abstract
This study investigated clinical outcomes of biomimetic mineralized collagen artificial bone putty for bone reconstruction in the treatment of calcaneus fracture. Sixty cases of calcaneal fractures surgically treated with open reduction and internal fixation in our hospital from June 2014-2015 were chosen and randomly divided into two groups, including 30 cases treated with biomimetic mineralized collagen artificial bone putty as treatment group, and 30 cases treated with autogenous ilia as control group. The average follow-up time was 17.2 ± 3.0 months. The results showed that the surgery duration and postoperative drainage volume of treatment group were significantly lower than control group; there were no statistically significant differences in the fracture healing time, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores at 3 and 12 months after surgery, Böhler's angle, Gissane's angle and height of calcaneus between the two groups. There were no significant differences in wound complication and reject reaction between the two groups, while significant difference in donor site complication. As a conclusion, the implantation of biomimetic mineralized collagen artificial bone putty in the open reduction of calcaneal fracture resulted in reliable effect and less complications, which is suitable for clinical applications in the treatment of bone defect in calcaneal fractures.Entities:
Keywords: bone grafting; bone substitute; calcaneus fracture; mineralized collagen artificial bone putty
Year: 2018 PMID: 29644087 PMCID: PMC5888141 DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbx033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Regen Biomater ISSN: 2056-3426
Figure 1Scanning electron microscopic observation of the mineralized collagen artificial bone putty
General data of the patients
| Group | Age | Gender | Cases (Sanders Classification II/III/IV) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ||||
| Treatment | 30 | 41.8 ± 10.0 | 27 | 3 | 9/18/3 |
| Control | 30 | 41.7 ± 7.7 | 28 | 2 | 7/19/4 |
| Statistic | |||||
Figure 2Critical steps of the treatment of a calcaneus fracture with mineralized collagen bone putty. (a) Exposure of bone defect of the calcaneus fracture; (b) implantation of the mineralized collagen artificial bone putty; c. fixation of the treated calcaneus with calcaneal anatomic locking plates; d. appearance at the completion of the surgery)
Clinical indexes comparison between the treatment and control groups
| Group | N | Operation duration (min) | Postoperative drainage volume (ml) | Fracture healing time (weeks) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 30 | 75.90 ± 4.75 | 231.33 ± 44.16 | 10.03 ± 1.73 |
| Control | 30 | 86.93 ± 5.26 | 266.00 ± 54.81 | 9.80 ± 1.75 |
| Statistic | ||||
Treatment effects between the treatment and control groups
| Group | Parameter | Preoperation | Postoperation | 12 months postoperation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Böhler’s angle (°) | 4.70 ± 6.52 | 31.40 ± 3.61 | 30.27 ± 3.35 |
| Gissane’s angle (°) | 137.17 ± 8.83 | 117.07 ± 5.70 | 116.17 ± 5.36 | |
| Calcaneus height (mm) | 39.13 ± 3.26 | 48.50 ± 3.22 | 47.77 ± 2.93 | |
| Control | Böhler’s angle (°) | 3.77 ± 7.15 | 30.87 ± 3.91 | 29.70 ± 3.11 |
| Gissane’s angle (°) | 137.70 ± 7.62 | 118.40 ± 5.84 | 117.40 ± 4.70 | |
| Calcaneus height (mm) | 38.20 ± 2.94 | 47.23 ± 2.86 | 46.47 ± 2.52 |
aIndicates that there was statistically significant difference compared with preoperation.
AOFAS scores between the treatment and control groups
| Group | 3 months | 12 months | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 30 | 65.23 ± 5.72 | 88.37 ± 3.61 |
| Control | 30 | 66.03 ± 4.20 | 88.37 ± 4.74 |
| Statistic | |||
Donor site complications between the treatment and control groups
| Group | Wound complications (cases) | Rejection (cases) | Donor site complications (cases) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 30 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Control | 30 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Statistic | ||||
Treatment effects of typical Case 1
| Observation time | Böhler’s angle (°) | Gissane’s angle (°) | Calcaneus height (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperation | −9 | 137 | 39 |
| Postoperation | 38 | 110 | 46 |
| 3 months postoperation | 37 | 109 | 45 |
| 12 months postoperation | 37 | 109 | 45 |
Treatment effects of typical Case 3
| Observation time | Böhler’s angle (°) | Gissane’s angle (°) | Calcaneus height (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperation | 0 | 128 | 40 |
| Postoperation | 23 | 118 | 44 |
| 3 months postoperation | 23 | 118 | 44 |
| 12 months postoperation | 23 | 118 | 44 |
AOFAS scores of the three typical Cases at 3 and 12 months postoperation
| Observation time | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months postoperation | 65 | 63 | 63 |
| 12 months postoperation | 87 | 85 | 90 |
Figure 3Plain radiographs of the first typical case. (a and b) Preoperative lateral and anteroposterior films; (c and d) immediately postoperative lateral and anteroposterior films; (e and f) 3 months postoperative lateral and anteroposterior films; (g and h) 12 months postoperative lateral and anteroposterior films)
Figure 4Plain radiographs of the second typical case. (a and b) Preoperative lateral and anteroposterior films; (c and d) immediately postoperative lateral and anteroposterior films; (e and f) 3 months postoperative lateral and anteroposterior films; (g and h) 12 months postoperative lateral and anteroposterior films)
Figure 5Plain radiographs of the third typical case. (a and b) preoperative lateral and anteroposterior films; (c and d) immediately postoperative lateral and anteroposterior films; (e and f) 3 months postoperative lateral and anteroposterior films; (g and h) 12 months postoperative lateral and anteroposterior films)
Treatment effects of typical Case 2
| Observation time | Böhler’s angle (°) | Gissane’s angle (°) | Calcaneus height (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperation | 5 | 135 | 39 |
| Postoperation | 38 | 119 | 48 |
| 3 months postoperation | 37 | 116 | 48 |
| 12 months postoperation | 37 | 116 | 48 |