In ophthalmological research, the use of zebrafish to investigate visual behaviors has been increasing, but can produce misleading, false-positive results if compounds adversely affect their motor functions or central nervous system. Therefore, histological analysis to identify a target organ is important in zebrafish toxicity assay. We investigated the retinal degeneration in zebrafish, using typical retinal toxicants, mainly sodium iodate and N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU). No histopathological changes were found after sodium iodate exposure at 1.0 mM for 5 or 7 days in the retina of larval, juvenile, and adult zebrafish. There were also no obvious histopathological changes in the retina of adult zebrafish at 0.1 mM, even after 30 days treatment with sodium iodate. In addition, many proliferating cell nuclear antigen-positive cells were found not only in the ciliary marginal zone, but also in the outer nuclear layer, especially in larval and juvenile zebrafish with or without sodium iodate exposure. However, the concentrations of iodine in the blood and the eyeballs of adult zebrafish increased remarkably after the treatment. General retinal damage emerged after MNU exposure at 150 mg/l for 60 min in adult zebrafish, but first pyknotic cells appeared in the inner nuclear layer and the ganglion cell layer. Our findings indicate that zebrafish retina have a different reactivity pattern from mammalian animals against some retinal toxicants, and in them it is difficult to detect histopathological changes.
In ophthalmological research, the use of zebrafish to investigate visual behaviors has been increasing, but can produce misleading, false-positive results if compounds adversely affect their motor functions or central nervous system. Therefore, histological analysis to identify a target organ is important in zebrafishtoxicity assay. We investigated the retinal degeneration in zebrafish, using typical retinal toxicants, mainly sodium iodate and N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU). No histopathological changes were found after sodium iodate exposure at 1.0 mM for 5 or 7 days in the retina of larval, juvenile, and adult zebrafish. There were also no obvious histopathological changes in the retina of adult zebrafish at 0.1 mM, even after 30 days treatment with sodium iodate. In addition, many proliferating cell nuclear antigen-positive cells were found not only in the ciliary marginal zone, but also in the outer nuclear layer, especially in larval and juvenile zebrafish with or without sodium iodate exposure. However, the concentrations of iodine in the blood and the eyeballs of adult zebrafish increased remarkably after the treatment. General retinal damage emerged after MNU exposure at 150 mg/l for 60 min in adult zebrafish, but first pyknotic cells appeared in the inner nuclear layer and the ganglion cell layer. Our findings indicate that zebrafish retina have a different reactivity pattern from mammalian animals against some retinal toxicants, and in them it is difficult to detect histopathological changes.
It is now generally accepted that zebrafish provide an excellent model system for biological
research, including drug discovery [7]. The use of
zebrafish, especially larval zebrafish, for early safety assessment has been increasing
recently because of its relatively good throughput property related with its small body size
and rapid growth [4, 9, 11].In ophthalmological research, the zebrafish is expected to be a useful organism because the
visual system of the zebrafish is basically similar to that of humans [1, 8]. For example, a number of
methods have been established for investigating zebrafish visual function, such as optomotor
response (OMR) assay, optokinetic response assay, startle response, escape response, and
visual motor response assay [1, 5]. Among these, the OMR assay and the visual motor response assay have good
throughput properties, and have been used to assess effect of compounds that are well known as
ocular toxicants on visual function [3, 16]. These studies indicated that the OMR assay using
larval zebrafish has a high predictability for drug toxicity.However, these visual assays based on behavioral response might produce misleading results if
the investigated compounds adversely affect in organs, motor functions, or central nervous
system, which critically effect behavior. For this reason, histological analysis is thought to
be essential to identifying a target organ in zebrafish.Sodium iodate is a typical retinal toxicant, and is thought to primarily induce retinal
pigmented epithelial cell necrosis, resulting in a patchy loss of the retinal pigmented
epithelial cells, followed by apoptosis of photoreceptor cells [10]. Sodium iodate-induced retinal toxicity has been reported in many
mammals, such as mice [10], rats [21], rabbits [2], and monkeys [12]. Sodium iodate, however, is known not to affect
zebrafish OMR activity [16], while
N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU), a well-known inducer of photoreceptor degeneration via DNA
alkylation of photoreceptors in mammals, induced massive rod photoreceptor degeneration after
only 60 min exposure in adult zebrafish [17, 18]. As the other toxicants, gentamicin or chloroquine are
known to cause retinal disorder [16, 22].In this study, we therefore examined whether sodium iodate induces retinal histopathological
changes in three different developmental stages of zebrafish. The retinal toxicity of MNU was
also tested in adult zebrafish. Such a study is of importance to provide information on
zebrafish as a model for ocular research. In addition, this study is of significance from a
viewpoint of the veterinary field; e.g., accumulating knowledge of comparative toxicology
between mammalians and fish, and characteristics of poisoning in aquatic animals. With this
background, we employed three different maturation stages of zebrafish, larva, juvenile, and
adult, to probe their different sensitivities against the toxicants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
Fertilized eggs of the AB strain of zebrafish (Danio rerio) were
provided by the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Research Institute Department
of Cell Biology (Osaka, Japan). Juvenile zebrafish (body length approx. 1.5–2 cm) were
purchased from the National Institute for Environmental Studies (Tsukuba, Japan). Adult
zebrafish (body length approx. 4 cm) were purchased from the National Institute for
Environmental Studies or another supplier (Meito Suien Co., Ltd., Nagoya, Japan).
Zebrafish were bred and maintained in accordance with standard procedures [20]. Zebrafish and fertilized eggs were maintained in
rooms on a 14-hr light/10-hr dark cycle at approximately 28.5°C, and were bred in 0.3%
artificial seawater, composed of distilled water with Sealife® (Marine Tech,
Tokyo, Japan) artificial sea salt. The juvenile and adult fish were fed a commercial feed
(Otohime B1, SAN-U Fish Farm, Osaka, Japan) twice daily.Male 7-week-old rats (strain: Sprague-Dawley) were obtained from Japan SLC, Inc.
(Hamamatsu, Japan) and total of twelve rats were used in this experiment when they were 8
weeks old. These were housed in air-conditioned rooms maintained at 20 to 26°C, 40 to 70%
relative humidity, and a 12-hr light/dark cycle. Rats were fed a commercial pellet feed
(CRF-1, Oriental Yeast Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and supplied with tap water ad
libitum.All experimental procedures involving animals were performed in accordance with the ARVO
Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research and were approved by
the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Exposure of zebrafish to sodium iodate
Larval zebrafish hatched from eggs were exposed by immersion in 0.3% artificial seawater
containing the final concentrations of 0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 mM sodium iodate (Sigma-Aldrich,
St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.) from 3 days post-fertilization (dpf) to 8 dpf in 12-well plates
with 10 larvae per well (N=10). Replacement of 0.3% artificial seawater containing sodium
iodate was performed at 6 dpf.Juvenile zebrafish were treated in 0.3% artificial seawater containing the final
concentrations of 0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 mM of sodium iodate for 7 days at a rearing density of
5 or less fish/l in 5-l tank (N=5).Adult zebrafish were treated in 0.3% artificial seawater containing the final
concentration of 1.0 mM of sodium iodate for 7 days at a rearing density of 3 fish/200
ml in 500-ml glass beakers (N=3). Replacement of the
compound in 0.3% artificial seawater was done every day. The maximum tolerated
concentration was estimated in larval and adult zebrafish, and was judged to be 1.0 mM,
based on observation for lethality and abnormal behavior. In order to examine long-term
toxicity, adult zebrafish were exposed to 0.1 mM of sodium iodate for 30 days (N=3). For
determination of iodine concentration, 9 adult zebrafish were used per group. Fish were
randomly divided into three subgroups of 3 fish each, and exposed to sodium iodate as
described above. The fish were decapitated, and the blood of each was collected into one
heparinized hematocrit capillary tube, and then the blood samples were pooled together
into a single tube (N=3). The eyes were enucleated, and one eye of each of 3 zebrafish was
put into one tube (N=3). In all experiments using zebrafish, 0.3% artificial seawater was
used as the vehicle control.
Exposure of zebrafish to MNU
Adult zebrafish were treated in 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.3), containing the final
concentration of 150 mg/l of MNU (Sigma-Aldrich) for 60 min (N=2), in
accordance with the previous description [17, 18].
Exposure of rats to sodium iodate
Sodium iodate was dissolved in sterile saline (Otsuka Pharmaceutical factory, Inc.,
Tokyo, Japan) as a 2% w/v stock solution. The 8-week-old rats were anesthetized by a 2.5
ml/kg intraperitoneal injection of a 4:1 mixture of 5% ketamine
hydrochloride (Daiichi Sankyo Propharma Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and 2% xylazine
hydrochloride (Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany). A single dose of sodium iodate (40 mg/kg) was
intravenously injected via the tail vein (N=3). The control animals were injected with the
same volume of the saline. For investigation of the time-specific effect of sodium iodate,
the rats were euthanized under the anesthesia described as above at 5 min, 2 hr, and 7
days after sodium iodate injection. The blood was collected from abdominal veins to
determine the exposure levels of sodium iodate. The eyes were enucleated to examine
histopathological changes and to determine the exposure levels of sodium iodate.
Histopathological examination
Whole larvae were fixed overnight in a solution of 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and 5%
sucrose in 0.1 M phosphate buffer at 4°C, and embedded in paraffin. Adult and juvenile
zebrafish were euthanized by immersion in ice-cold water or 1:1,000 dilution of
2-phenoxyethanol. After the euthanasia, adult and juvenile zebrafish were decapitated, and
the heads were fixed overnight in Bouin’s solution (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.,
Osaka, Japan) at 4°C, and thereafter embedded in paraffin. The paraffin blocks were cut in
5 µm thick sections, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin
(H&E).The eyes of rats were fixed overnight in a solution of 10% formalin (Wako Pure Chemical
Industries, Ltd.): 25% glutaraldehyde (Nacalai Tesque, Inc., Kyoto, Japan) (9:1) at 4°C,
and thereafter embedded in paraffin. H&E stained specimens were prepared under routine
method.
The procedure of fixation for the eyeballs was the same as described above, but slightly
modified: Whole larvae were fixed at room temperature for 60 min. The eyes of adult
zebrafish were enucleated and fixed in a solution of 4% PFA at 4°C overnight.Paraffin sections were pretreated with heating at approximately 98°C for 45 min in 10 mM
citrate buffer (pH 6.0). Immunostaining was performed in accordance with the standard
protocols using 5% normal goat serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, U.S.A.) in
0.2% Triton X-100 as a blocking reagent, and primary antibody was diluted with 1% normal
goat serum/0.2% Triton X-100. The secondary antibody was diluted with DAKO Real Antibody
Diluent (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, U.S.A.), as follows: The primary antibody
used was anti-PCNA (1:1,000, clone PC10, Sigma-Aldrich), and the secondary antibody used
was Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:1,000, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cell
nuclei were counterstained with 4’, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Thermo Fisher
Scientific).
Determination of blood/tissue iodine concentrations
The iodine from the blood and eyeballs were extracted by adding 0.1 N hydrogen chloride
and 1% Triton X-100. The concentrations of iodine were analyzed on an inductively coupled
plasma mass spectrometer (Agilent 7700x ICP-MS, Agilent Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) at
Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
RESULTS
Histopathology of sodium iodate-induced lesions and expression of PCNA in the larval,
juvenile and adult zebrafish retina
In larval zebrafish, there were no histopathological changes in the retina after sodium
iodate exposure from 3 to 8 dpf at any dose (Fig.
1). Many PCNA-positive cells were found in the ciliary marginal zone, where the stem
cell niche is located in the retina, and the outer nuclear layer in larval zebrafish with
and without treatment (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Representative images of H&E and PCNA staining of larval zebrafish eyes after
sodium iodate exposure at 0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 mM, respectively, from 3 to 8 dpf. No
significant differences were observed in H&E and PCNA staining between the
control group and the treatment groups. PCNA-positive cells were observed in the CMZ
and the ONL. Green: PCNA; Blue: DAPI; CMZ: ciliary marginal zone; GCL: ganglion cell
layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer. Scale bars indicate 100
µm.
Representative images of H&E and PCNA staining of larval zebrafish eyes after
sodium iodate exposure at 0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 mM, respectively, from 3 to 8 dpf. No
significant differences were observed in H&E and PCNA staining between the
control group and the treatment groups. PCNA-positive cells were observed in the CMZ
and the ONL. Green: PCNA; Blue: DAPI; CMZ: ciliary marginal zone; GCL: ganglion cell
layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer. Scale bars indicate 100
µm.Similarly, no histopathological changes were found in the retinas of the juvenile
zebrafish after sodium iodate exposure for 7 days at any dose (Fig. 2), and many PCNA-positive cells were also noted in the ciliary marginal zone and the
outer nuclear layer in juvenile zebrafish with and without treatment.
Fig. 2.
Representative images of H&E and PCNA staining of juvenile zebrafish retinas
after sodium iodate exposure at 0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 mM, respectively, for 7 days. No
significant differences were observed in H&E and PCNA staining between the
control group and the treatment groups. PCNA-positive cells were observed in the CMZ
and the ONL. Green: PCNA; Blue: DAPI; CMZ: ciliary marginal zone; GCL: ganglion cell
layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer. Scale bars indicate 100
µm.
Representative images of H&E and PCNA staining of juvenile zebrafish retinas
after sodium iodate exposure at 0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 mM, respectively, for 7 days. No
significant differences were observed in H&E and PCNA staining between the
control group and the treatment groups. PCNA-positive cells were observed in the CMZ
and the ONL. Green: PCNA; Blue: DAPI; CMZ: ciliary marginal zone; GCL: ganglion cell
layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer. Scale bars indicate 100
µm.In adult zebrafish, there were no histopathological changes after sodium iodate exposure
for 7 days at 1.0 mM, in spite of finding much fewer PCNA-positive cells in the ciliary
marginal zone and the outer nuclear layer than in larval and juvenile zebrafish (Fig. 3). In the examination for long-term toxicity, no obvious histopathological changes
were found at 0.1 mM, even after 30 days treatment with sodium iodate (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3.
Representative images of H&E and PCNA staining of adult zebrafish retinas after
sodium iodate exposure at 1.0 mM for 7 days. No significant differences were
observed in H&E and PCNA staining between the control group and the treatment
group. PCNA-positive cells were observed in the CMZ and the ONL. Green: PCNA; Blue:
DAPI; CMZ: ciliary marginal zone; GCL: ganglion cell layer; INL: inner nuclear
layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer. Scale bars indicate 100 µm.
Fig. 4.
Representative images of H&E staining of adult zebrafish retinas after sodium
iodate exposure at 0.1 mM for 30 days. No significant differences were observed
between the control group and the treatment group. Scale bars indicate 100
µm.
Representative images of H&E and PCNA staining of adult zebrafish retinas after
sodium iodate exposure at 1.0 mM for 7 days. No significant differences were
observed in H&E and PCNA staining between the control group and the treatment
group. PCNA-positive cells were observed in the CMZ and the ONL. Green: PCNA; Blue:
DAPI; CMZ: ciliary marginal zone; GCL: ganglion cell layer; INL: inner nuclear
layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer. Scale bars indicate 100 µm.Representative images of H&E staining of adult zebrafish retinas after sodium
iodate exposure at 0.1 mM for 30 days. No significant differences were observed
between the control group and the treatment group. Scale bars indicate 100
µm.
Histopathology of MNU-induced lesions in the adult zebrafish retina
Whereas sodium iodate did not induce retinal changes in any stage of zebrafish, MNU
induced retinal damage in adult zebrafish. Compared with the untreated control retina,
several pyknotic cells in the inner nuclear layer and a few of ones in the ganglion cell
layer appeared at 6 hr after MNU exposure (Fig.
5B, black arrowheads). The number of these cells increased at 24 hr (Fig. 5C, black arrowheads). At day 3, obscuration of
retinal structure between the inner nuclear layer and the photoreceptor layer was
advanced, and the number of cells likely to decrease in the inner nuclear layer and the
outer nuclear layer (Fig. 5D). At day 5, the
obscuration of the retinal structure sustained over time, and some parts of the inner
nuclear layer were fused with the outer nuclear layer (Fig. 5E, white arrows). In addition, cells appeared in the inner plexiform layer
(Fig. 5E, white arrowheads). At day 8,
amelioration of retinal structure obscuration was observed, accompanied by an increase in
the number of cells in the inner plexiform layer and the revelation of cell nests which
had hyperchromatic nuclei (Fig. 5F, black
arrow).
Fig. 5.
Representative images of H&E staining of adult zebrafish retinas after MNU
exposure. Each group of zebrafish was exposed to MNU for 60 min and thereafter
maintained under standard conditions for 6 hr, 24 hr, 3 days, 5 days and 8 days,
respectively. (A) Vehicle control; (B) Six hr of maintenance after exposure, the
pyknotic cells (black arrowheads) started to appear in the INL and the GCL; (C)
Twenty four hr of maintenance after exposure, the number of pyknotic cells increased
(black arrowheads); (D) Three days of maintenance after exposure, obscuration of
retinal structure between the INL and the ONL was observed; (E) Five days of
maintenance after exposure, some parts of the INL were fused with the ONL (white
arrow); (F) Eight days of maintenance after exposure, accumulation of cell clusters
was observed in the INL (black arrow) and cells appeared in the INL (white
arrowheads). GCL: ganglion cell layer; IPL: inner plexiform layer; INL: inner
nuclear layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer. Scale bars indicate 100
µm.
Representative images of H&E staining of adult zebrafish retinas after MNU
exposure. Each group of zebrafish was exposed to MNU for 60 min and thereafter
maintained under standard conditions for 6 hr, 24 hr, 3 days, 5 days and 8 days,
respectively. (A) Vehicle control; (B) Six hr of maintenance after exposure, the
pyknotic cells (black arrowheads) started to appear in the INL and the GCL; (C)
Twenty four hr of maintenance after exposure, the number of pyknotic cells increased
(black arrowheads); (D) Three days of maintenance after exposure, obscuration of
retinal structure between the INL and the ONL was observed; (E) Five days of
maintenance after exposure, some parts of the INL were fused with the ONL (white
arrow); (F) Eight days of maintenance after exposure, accumulation of cell clusters
was observed in the INL (black arrow) and cells appeared in the INL (white
arrowheads). GCL: ganglion cell layer; IPL: inner plexiform layer; INL: inner
nuclear layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer. Scale bars indicate 100
µm.
Measurement of iodine in the blood and the eyeballs of adult zebrafish and
rats
Table 1 shows the concentrations of iodine in the blood from adult zebrafish and
rats. After 7 days exposure of adult zebrafish to sodium iodate, the concentration of
iodine was approximately 450 times higher as compared with the control group. The
concentration of iodine in the blood in rats rapidly increased 5 min after intravenous
injection, and was sustained thereafter up to 2 hr (Table 1). Seven days after injection, the concentration of iodine in the blood
from rats returned to the base line.
Table 1.
Concentration of iodine in the whole blood of adult zebrafish and rats after
sodium iodate treatment at different time points
Sample No.
Concentration in blood
(ng/ml)
Adult zebrafish (1.0 mM)
Rat (40 mg/kg)
Control
Day 7
Control
5 min
2 hr
Day 7
1
57.0
24,299.1
253.4
3,681.2
15,341.2
144.8
2
94.9
49,584.8
182.7
11,845.1
10,709.8
100.4
3
70.1
28,923.8
71.5
17,046.8
8,085.6
91.9
Average
74.0
34,269.2
169.2
10,857.7
11,378.9
112.4
Table 2 shows the concentration of iodine in the eyeballs of adult zebrafish and
rats. The concentration of iodine in adult zebrafish was significantly higher in the
treatment group at 7 days than that of the control group. The concentration of iodine in
the eyeballs of rats also increased rapidly 5 min after intravenous injection, and was
sustained 2 hr after injection. Seven days after injection, the concentration of iodine in
eyeballs of rats had decreased to the base line.
Table 2.
Concentration of iodine in the eyeballs of adult zebrafish and rats after
sodium iodate treatment at different time points
Animal No.
Concentration in ocular tissue
(ng/g)
Adult zebrafish (1.0 mM)
Rat (40 mg/kg)
Control
Day 7
Control
5 min
2 hr
Day 7
1
26.0
4,863.6
97.2
444.5
4,953.5
50.3
2
26.6
4,285.9
117.6
1,541.8
3,603.2
BLQ (33.0)
3
21.6
6,663.9
BLQ (12.9)
4,562.4
2,729.3
BLQ (16.6)
Average
24.7
5,271.1
107.4
2,182.9
3,762.0
50.3
BLQ: Below the lower limit of quantification (50 ng/g). ():
Extrapolation value.
BLQ: Below the lower limit of quantification (50 ng/g). ():
Extrapolation value.As shown in Fig. 6, there were no histopathological changes at 5 min or at 2 hr after injection in rat
retina. The outer nuclear layer, the IS/OS junction, and the retinal pigment epithelium
layer were disrupted 7 days after injection. Simultaneously, retinal folding was evident
and the inner nuclear layer showed abnormal shape resulting from compression with the
outer nuclear layer. There were no histopathological changes in the ganglion cell
layer.
Fig. 6.
Representative images of H&E staining of rat retinas after sodium iodate
treatment at 40 mg/kg. (A) Vehicle control; (B) At 5 min after the treatment; (C) At
2 hr after the treatment; (D) Seven days after the treatment, the ONL, IS/OS
junction and the RPE layer were disrupted and retinal folding was observed. GCL:
ganglion cell layer; IPL: inner plexiform layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; ONL:
outer nuclear layer; RPE: retinal pigmented epithelium. Scale bars indicate 100
µm.
Representative images of H&E staining of rat retinas after sodium iodate
treatment at 40 mg/kg. (A) Vehicle control; (B) At 5 min after the treatment; (C) At
2 hr after the treatment; (D) Seven days after the treatment, the ONL, IS/OS
junction and the RPE layer were disrupted and retinal folding was observed. GCL:
ganglion cell layer; IPL: inner plexiform layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; ONL:
outer nuclear layer; RPE: retinal pigmented epithelium. Scale bars indicate 100
µm.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we investigated sodium iodate-induced histopathological changes in zebrafish
retina, but did not observe retinal lesions as histopathological changes at any of three
different developmental stages of zebrafish in short-term (larvae for 5 days, juvenile and
adult for 7 days) studies and a long-term (adult for 30 days) study. In order to compare the
retinal lesions between zebrafish and rats, sodium iodate was injected intravenously in rats
at a dose of 40 mg/kg, which generates toxicity consistently to the retina but not to other
organs [21]. In contrast to zebrafish, the outer
nuclear layer, the IS/OS junction, and the retinal pigment epithelium layer in rats were
disrupted 7 days after injection. Furthermore, adult zebrafish were exposed to gentamicin or
chloroquine, which are known as retinal toxicants, for 7 days at their maximum tolerated
doses in our preliminary study, but these chemicals did not induce histopathological changes
in the retina (data not shown). These findings lead us to consider that zebrafish have a
different feature of reactivity against sodium iodate from rats.We examined the effect of MNU on retina in adult zebrafish morphologically. As the result,
MNU induced retinal damage in zebrafish. This also verified our experimental procedure for
testing retinal damage in zebrafish under chemical exposure in an aquarium. MNU is well
known to be an alkylating agent, and induces severe retinal degeneration in mammals such as
mice [15] and rats [14]. The lesions are caused by DNA alkylation of the outer nuclear layer [14]. It is noteworthy that the retinal lesion induced by
MNU is somewhat different between zebrafish and mammalian species, i.e., we observed the
pyknotic cells in the inner nuclear layer and the ganglion cell layer first, and then the
number of cells in the inner nuclear layer and the outer nuclear layer gradually decreased,
which is different from the findings in previous reports [17, 18]. These results indicate the
difference in MNU-induced retinal morphological changes between zebrafish and mammals.It is well known that zebrafish regenerate their retinal tissue after physical damage
[23], chemical toxicity [6, 17], and light stimulation
[19]. As is evident from distribution of
PCNA-positive cells in our experiments, many PCNA-positive cells were found in the ciliary
marginal zone and the outer nuclear layer in larval and juvenile zebrafish. In adult
zebrafish retina, PCNA-positive cells were found in the same sites, but the number of cells
in adult zebrafish was much less than that of cells in larvae and juveniles. The number of
PCNA-positive cells was comparable between the control and the sodium iodate-treated groups
in all three developmental stages of zebrafish. Therefore, it is apparent that zebrafish
possess the regenerative activities during maturation and aging, even though some difference
exists in the parts of retina. Muto et al. [13] presented that zebrafish mutants generated with ethylnitrosourea are
morphologically indistinguishable from wild type, implying biological stability in retinal
morphology. It appears to be difficult to observe histopathological changes, especialy if
they are slight, in zebrafish retina because of their regeneration activity during
maturation or morphological stability. Future research is required to clarify these
different reactivities of zebrafish from those of mammalian animals against some retinal
toxicants.The concentration of iodine in the blood and the eyeballs of adult zebrafish and rats
increased remarkably. The concentration of iodine in zebrafish was higher than that in rats,
indicating that zebrafish should obtain sufficient exposure to sodium iodate in aquariums.
This result rules out the possibility of low exposure level as a cause of apparent
insensitivity of retinal changes to sodium iodate in zebrafish.We used different strains of zebrafish in this study. However, when adult zebrafish of AB
strain were exposed to sodium iodate for 7 days at 1.0 mM, no histopathological changes were
found (data not shown) as well. Therefore, we think that strain differences did not affect
the results of this study.The present results give us cause for caution in using zebrafish as a model of mammals
including humans. Taken together, our findings indicate that it is difficult to detect
retinal histopathological changes due to tolerance of organism. Moreover, zebrafish have a
different reactivity pattern from mammals against retinal toxicants.In summary, we present that zebrafish have different features of reactivity from mammals
against retinal toxicants, which cause difficulties in detecting histopathological changes
from chemical insults, even under sufficient chemical exposure. The present results provide
information in regards to the use of zebrafish as a model for mammals for retinal toxicity
and basic knowledge concerning characteristics of poisoning in fish.
Authors: T Yoshida; R Fukatsu; K Tsuzuki; Y Aizawa; Y Hayashi; N Sasaki; Y Takamaru; N Fujii; N Takahata Journal: Brain Res Date: 1997-08-01 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Ming Wai Hung; Zai Jun Zhang; Shang Li; Benson Lei; Shuai Yuan; Guo Zhen Cui; Pui Man Hoi; Kelvin Chan; Simon Ming Yuen Lee Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2012-08-05 Impact factor: 2.629