Literature DB >> 14596489

How meta-analysis increases statistical power.

Lawrence D Cohn1, Betsy J Becker.   

Abstract

One of the most frequently cited reasons for conducting a meta-analysis is the increase in statistical power that it affords a reviewer. This article demonstrates that fixed-effects meta-analysis increases statistical power by reducing the standard error of the weighted average effect size (T.) and, in so doing, shrinks the confidence interval around T.. Small confidence intervals make it more likely for reviewers to detect nonzero population effects, thereby increasing statistical power. Smaller confidence intervals also represent increased precision of the estimated population effect size. Computational examples are provided for 3 effect-size indices: d (standardized mean difference), Pearson's r, and odds ratios. Random-effects meta-analyses also may show increased statistical power and a smaller standard error of the weighted average effect size. However, the authors demonstrate that increasing the number of studies in a random-effects meta-analysis does not always increase statistical power.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14596489     DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  106 in total

1.  Differential interference effects of negative emotional states on subsequent semantic and perceptual processing.

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Marissa A Gorlick; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2011-12

2.  Continued chemotherapy after complete response to primary therapy among women with advanced ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lisa M Hess; Nan Rong; Patrick O Monahan; Paridha Gupta; Champ Thomaskutty; Daniela Matei
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  [Systematic reviews and meta-analysis].

Authors:  Gerald Gartlehner; Claudia Wild; Philipp Mad
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2008

4.  The CAG repeat polymorphism of androgen receptor gene and prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mingliang Gu; Xiaoqun Dong; Xuezhi Zhang; Wenquan Niu
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 5.  Association of XRCC3 gene rs861539 polymorphism with gastric cancer risk: evidence from a case-control study and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shidan Cheng; Liying Wang; Lei Wang; Zhengting Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-02-01

6.  Integrating prospective longitudinal data: modeling personality and health in the Terman Life Cycle and Hawaii Longitudinal Studies.

Authors:  Margaret L Kern; Sarah E Hampson; Lewis R Goldberg; Howard S Friedman
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2012-12-10

7.  Scalability of an Evidence-Based Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Program: New Evidence From 5 Cluster-Randomized Evaluations of the Teen Outreach Program.

Authors:  Kimberly Francis; Susan Philliber; Eric R Walsh-Buhi; Ashley Philliber; Roopa Seshadri; Ellen Daley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  No evidence of correlation between p53 codon 72 G > C gene polymorphism and cancer risk in Indian population: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raju K Mandal; Suraj S Yadav; Aditya K Panda
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-05-28

Review 9.  Candidate gene studies in gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kshitij Srivastava; Anvesha Srivastava; Kiran Lata Sharma; Balraj Mittal
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Handling Stress and Sample Storage Are Associated with Weaker Complement-Mediated Bactericidal Ability in Birds but Not Bats.

Authors:  Daniel J Becker; Gábor Á Czirják; Agnieszka Rynda-Apple; Raina K Plowright
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.247

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.