Literature DB >> 29642690

Impella-protected PCI: the clinical results achieved so far.

Gabriele Pesarini1, Andrea Gratta1, Giulia Dolci1, Mattia Lunardi1, Flavio L Ribichini2.   

Abstract

The ability of interventional cardiologists to identify high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients, requires the integration of different features belonging to medical history, organ damage, coronary anatomy and the nature of the acute event. The selection of a subgroup of patients that could benefit from mechanical support during interventions is a key feature to success. The introduction of the Impella percutaneous axial pump have added an easy-to-set-up, less invasive and time-consuming active-support device to the interventional toolbox. Up to date, only few (four) randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have tried to address the clinical efficacy of Impella assistance for the treatment of this very high-risk population, but several large registries and multiple observational studies have demonstrated its safety, feasibility and hemodynamic performance. Although the largest RCT (PROTECT II) have been prematurely stopped due to the risk of futility despite the evidence of more complete revascularization in the Impella arm, the need for an adequate operator's learning curve must be considered. More recent insights suggest an effect of the device in optimizing end-organ perfusion and improving crucial parameters like renal function. Furthermore, available data suggest that vary early Impella support may improve patient's outcome in case of cardiogenic shock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29642690     DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4725.18.04678-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Cardioangiol        ISSN: 0026-4725            Impact factor:   1.347


  4 in total

1.  Mechanical circulatory support with Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump or medical treatment in cardiogenic shock-a critical appraisal of current data.

Authors:  Bernhard Wernly; Clemens Seelmaier; David Leistner; Barbara E Stähli; Ingrid Pretsch; Michael Lichtenauer; Christian Jung; Uta C Hoppe; Ulf Landmesser; Holger Thiele; Alexander Lauten
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry.

Authors:  Francesco Burzotta; Giulio Russo; Flavio Ribichini; Anna Piccoli; Domenico D'Amario; Lazzaro Paraggio; Leonardo Previ; Gabriele Pesarini; Italo Porto; Antonio Maria Leone; Giampaolo Niccoli; Cristina Aurigemma; Diana Verdirosi; Filippo Crea; Carlo Trani
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Role of acquired von Willebrand syndrome in the development of bleeding complications in patients treated with Impella RP devices.

Authors:  Mehmet Oezkur; Sara Reda; Heiko Rühl; Nils Theuerkauf; Stefan Kreyer; Georg Daniel Duerr; Efstratios Charitos; Miriam Silaschi; Marta Medina; Sebastian Zimmer; Christian Putensen; Hendrik Treede
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Comparative safety of percutaneous ventricular assist device and intra-aortic balloon pump in acute myocardial infarction-induced cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Waqas Ullah; Mohamed Zghouzi; Maryam Mukhtar; Ali Banisad; Gaith Alhatemi; Yasar Sattar; Salman Zahid; Homam Moussa Pacha; Delair Gardi; M Chadi Alraies
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.