| Literature DB >> 29637814 |
Sen-Lu Chen1, Ru-Huei Fu2,3,4, Shih-Fei Liao1, Shih-Ping Liu2,3, Shinn-Zong Lin5, Yu-Chi Wang1.
Abstract
It is extremely challenging to achieve strong adhesion in soft tissues while minimizing toxicity, tissue damage, and other side effects caused by wound sealing materials. In this study, flexible synthetic hydrogel sealants were prepared based on polyethylene glycol (PEG) materials. PEG is a synthetic material that is nontoxic and inert and, thus, suitable for use in medical products. We evaluated the in vitro biocompatibility tests of the dressings to assess cytotoxicity and irritation, sensitization, pyrogen toxicity, and systemic toxicity following the International Organization for Standardization 10993 standards and the in vivo effects of the hydrogel samples using Coloskin liquid bandages as control samples for potential in wound closure.Entities:
Keywords: biocompatibility; hydrogel; polyethylene glycol; wound closure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29637814 PMCID: PMC5898694 DOI: 10.1177/0963689717749032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Transplant ISSN: 0963-6897 Impact factor: 4.064
Cytotoxicity Evaluated Using Neutral Red Stain.
| Test Item | Cell Lysis (%) | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Blank (B) | 0 | 0 |
| Negative control (NC) | 1 | 0 |
| Positive control (PC) | 100 | 4 |
| Test sample (S) | 5 | 0 |
Fig. 1.The characteristics of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based hydrogel. (A) The picture displays the elasticity of PEG-based hydrogel containing 30% PEG-based hydrogel. A hydrogel strip can be easily stretched to about 10 times its initial length without visible or permanent deformation. (B) Swelling ratios of PEG-based hydrogel at different time points. (C) The relative mass of PEG-based hydrogel decreased over time due to degradation in the difference temperature.
Fig. 2.In vitro cell viability and 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The observed cell morphology of L929 cells (mouse fibroblast cell line) after being treated for 24 h under 100× inverted microscope. (A) Blank (B): culture medium. (B) Negative control (NC): high-density polyethylene. (C) Positive control (PC): 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). (D) Test sample (S): polyethylene glycol (PEG)–based hydrogel.
The Results of MTT Assay for Evaluation of Cell Viability.
| Test Item | Absorbance (OD570 nm) | Viability (%) | Mortality (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blank (B) | 1.065 ± 0.071 | 100 | 0 |
| Negative control (NC) | 1.051 ± 0.056 | 99 | 1 |
| Positive control (PC) | 0.294 ± 0.038 | 28 | 72 |
| Test sample (S) | 0.861 ± 0.053 | 81 | 19 |
Abbreviation: MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethyl-thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium.
Skin Reaction in Guinea Pigs.
| Group (0.9% saline) | Control | Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Number of animals | 5 | 10 |
| Erythema and eschar | 0/5 | 0/10 |
| Edema | 0/5 | 0/10 |
| Group (cottonseed oil) | Control | Treatment |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Number of animals | 5 | 10 |
| Erythema and eschar | 0/5 | 0/10 |
| Edema | 0/5 | 0/10 |
Note. n/n, no. of guinea pigs with abnormal clinical signs/no. of guinea pigs per group.
Fig. 3.Skin sensitization study. (A) Pictures for observation of skin reaction (0.9% saline). (B) Pictures for observation of skin reaction (cottonseed oil). (C) Pictures for observation of skin reaction (positive control).
Fig. 4.Intracutaneous irritation study. (A) Observation at the 24th h of administration. (B) Observation at the 48th h of administration. (C) Observation at the 72nd h of administration.
Pyrogen Study in White Rabbits.
| (A) Control Temperature of Rabbits | |
|---|---|
| Animal number | Control temperature (°C) |
| 79-1001 | 39.42 |
| 79-1002 | 39.37 |
| 79-1003 | 39.25 |
| (B) Temperature Elevation | |
| Animal number | Elevation (body temperature after administration) |
| 79-1001 | −0.46 °C |
| 79-1002 | −0.10 °C |
| 79-1003 | −0.05 °C |
Note. Temperature elevation = the highest body temperature (among 5 times measurement) subtract control temperature.
Acute System Injection Study.
| (A) Incidence of Clinical Observation in Mice | ||
|---|---|---|
| Polar group | ||
| Number of animals | 5 male | 5 male |
| Treated article | 0.9% saline | PEG-based hydrogel |
| Toxicity reaction | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| Death | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| Nonpolar group | ||
| Number of animals | 5 male | 5 male |
| Treated article | Cottonseed oil | PEG-based hydrogel |
| Toxicity reaction | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| Death | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| (B) Incidence of Gross Finding | ||
| Polar group | ||
| Dose level (mL/kg) | 50 | 50 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Animal number | 5 | 5 |
| Symptom | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| Nonpolar group | ||
| Dose level (mL/kg) | 50 | 50 |
| Gender | Male | Male |
| Animal number | 5 | 5 |
| Symptom | 0/5 | 0/5 |
Note. n/n, no. of mice with gross signs/no. of mice per group.
Fig. 5.Animal experiment for wound closure. Photographs of wound closures. Skin incisions on back of the rats were treated by Coloskin and hydrogel, (A) 1 and (B) 4 d postimplantation. The closure skin was harvested and fixed in p-formaldehyde solution (3.7 wt.%) for histological analysis by hematoxylin and eosin and Masson’s trichrome stain (C) after 14 d. (D) The statistical results of collagen assay after 14 d treatment (P < 0.01). (E) The differences in wound area between the 2 treatments after 7 d (P < 0.01).