Literature DB >> 29637794

Population impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines compared with the 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for hypertension management.

Julien Vaucher1, Pedro Marques-Vidal1, Gérard Waeber1, Peter Vollenweider1.   

Abstract

Background The 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines on hypertension management recommend the introduction of antihypertensive treatment for patients with new stage 1 hypertension thresholds (130-139/80-89 mm Hg) and with a cardiovascular disease or related condition. We compared the Swiss population and economic impact of antihypertensive treatment of the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines with the 2013 European guidelines. Methods Analyses were based on 4438 participants (aged 45-85 years; 2448 women) of the CoLaus|PsyCoLaus study recruited between 2014-2017. Participants eligible for antihypertensive treatment according to the 2017 ACC/AHA and 2013 European guidelines were sex and age standardised using the Swiss population for 2016. In addition, we estimated the population-wide annual costs of antihypertensive treatment. Results Individuals eligible for antihypertensive treatment were 40.3% (95% confidence interval 38.5-42.1) and 31.3% (29.7-32.9) according to the 2017 ACC/AHA and 2013 European guidelines, respectively. That difference would translate into approximately 250,000 additional individuals eligible for antihypertensive treatment, corresponding to an additional annual cost of 72.5 million CHF (63.0 million EUR). Conclusion The 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines on the management of hypertension substantially increase the number of individuals eligible for antihypertensive treatment compared to the 2013 European guidelines. While implementation of the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines is expected to lead to cost reduction by preventing cardiovascular diseases, that reduction might be mitigated by the costs incurred by antihypertensive treatments in a larger proportion of the population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hypertension; guidelines; prevention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29637794     DOI: 10.1177/2047487318768938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol        ISSN: 2047-4873            Impact factor:   7.804


  7 in total

1.  Associations of blood pressure categories defined by 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines with mortality in China: Pooled results from three prospective cohorts.

Authors:  Na Liu; Jae Jeong Yang; Ruiwei Meng; Xiong-Fei Pan; Xiaomin Zhang; Meian He; Honglan Li; Yu-Tang Gao; Yong-Bing Xiang; Xiao-Ou Shu; Wei Zheng; Tangchun Wu; Danxia Yu; An Pan
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 7.804

2.  Impact of single-visit American versus European office blood pressure measurement procedure on individual blood pressure classification: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Annina S Vischer; Thenral Socrates; Clemens Winterhalder; Jens Eckstein; Michael Mayr; Thilo Burkard
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Clinical outcomes and economic impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines on hypertension in China.

Authors:  Zengwu Wang; Guang Hao; Xin Wang; Zuo Chen; Linfeng Zhang; Zugui Zhang; Hao Hu; William S Weintraub; Runlin Gao
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 4.  Management of Dyslipidaemia in Real-world Clinical Practice: Rationale and Design of the VIPFARMA ISCP Project.

Authors:  Ricardo Lopez Santi; Felipe Martinez; Adrian Baranchuk; Alvaro Sosa Liprandi; Daniel Piskorz; Alberto Lorenzatti; Maria Pilar Lopez Santi; Juan Carlos Kaski
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2021-04-27

5.  Potential impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline on high blood pressure in normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from the CLARIFY registry.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Vidal-Petiot; Emmanuel Sorbets; Deepak L Bhatt; Gregory Ducrocq; Yedid Elbez; Roberto Ferrari; Ian Ford; Jean-Claude Tardif; Michal Tendera; Kim M Fox; Philippe Gabriel Steg
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  A systematic breakdown of the levels of evidence supporting the European Society of Cardiology guidelines.

Authors:  Wouter B van Dijk; Diederick E Grobbee; Martine C de Vries; Rolf H H Groenwold; Rieke van der Graaf; Ewoud Schuit
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 7.804

7.  Population impact of different hypertension management guidelines based on the prospective population-based Heinz Nixdorf Recall study.

Authors:  Janine Gronewold; Rene Kropp; Nils Lehmann; Andreas Stang; Amir Mahabadi; Christian Weimar; Martin Dichgans; Susanne Moebus; Knut Kröger; Barbara Hoffmann; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Raimund Erbel; Dirk Hermann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.