| Literature DB >> 29637791 |
Adam Schickedanz1, Reshma Gupta1, Vineet M Arora2, Clarence H Braddock1.
Abstract
Graduate medical education (GME) lacks measures of resident preparation for high-quality, cost-conscious practice. The authors used publicly reported teaching hospital value measures to compare internal medicine residency programs on high-value care training and to validate these measures against program director perceptions of value. Program-level value training scores were constructed using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program hospital quality and cost-efficiency data. Correlations with Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine Annual Survey high-value care training measures were examined using logistic regression. For every point increase in program-level VBP score, residency directors were more likely to agree that GME programs have a responsibility to contain health care costs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.18, P = .04), their faculty model high-value care (aOR 1.07, P = .03), and residents are prepared to make high-value medical decisions (aOR 1.07, P = .09). Publicly reported clinical data offer valid measures of GME value training.Entities:
Keywords: cost-effectiveness; graduate medical education; quality; value
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29637791 PMCID: PMC6697657 DOI: 10.1177/1062860618767312
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Med Qual ISSN: 1062-8606 Impact factor: 1.852