Catalyst control over reactions that produce multiple stereoisomers is a challenge in synthesis. Control over reactions that involve stereogenic elements remote from one another is particularly uncommon. Additionally, catalytic reactions that address both stereogenic carbon centers and an element of axial chirality are also rare. Reported herein is a catalytic approach to each stereoisomer of a scaffold containing a stereogenic center remote from an axis of chirality. Newly developed peptidyl copper complexes catalyze an unprecedented remote desymmetrization involving enantioselective C-N bond-forming cross-coupling. Then, chiral phosphoric acid catalysts set an axis of chirality through an unprecedented atroposelective cyclodehydration to form a heterocycle with high diastereoselectivity. The application of chiral copper complexes and phosphoric acids provides access to each stereoisomer of a framework with two different elements of stereogenicity.
Catalyst control over reactions that produce multiple stereoisomers is a challenge in synthesis. Control over reactions that involve stereogenic elements remote from one another is particularly uncommon. Additionally, catalytic reactions that address both stereogenic n class="Chemical">carbon centers and an element of axial chirality are also rare. Reported herein is a catalytic approach to each stereoisomer of a scaffold containing a stereogenic center remote from an axis of chirality. Newly developed peptidyl copper complexes catalyze an unprecedented remote desymmetrization involving enantioselective C-N bond-forming cross-coupling. Then, chiral phosphoric acid catalysts set an axis of chirality through an unprecedented atroposelective cyclodehydration to form a heterocycle with high diastereoselectivity. The application of chiral copper complexes and phosphoric acids provides access to each stereoisomer of a framework with two different elements of stereogenicity.
Authors: Steven R Laplante; Lee D Fader; Keith R Fandrick; Daniel R Fandrick; Oliver Hucke; Ray Kemper; Stephen P F Miller; Paul J Edwards Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2011-09-15 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Byoungmoo Kim; Alex J Chinn; Daniel R Fandrick; Chris H Senanayake; Robert A Singer; Scott J Miller Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Paulina K Sydor; Sarah M Barry; Olanipekun M Odulate; Francisco Barona-Gomez; Stuart W Haynes; Christophe Corre; Lijiang Song; Gregory L Challis Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2011-04-17 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Yongseok Kwon; Junqi Li; Jolene P Reid; Jennifer M Crawford; Roxane Jacob; Matthew S Sigman; F Dean Toste; Scott J Miller Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Christopher R Shugrue; Bianca R Sculimbrene; Elizabeth R Jarvo; Brandon Q Mercado; Scott J Miller Journal: J Org Chem Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 4.354
Authors: Anthony J Metrano; Alex J Chinn; Christopher R Shugrue; Elizabeth A Stone; Byoungmoo Kim; Scott J Miller Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Sagar D Vaidya; Sean T Toenjes; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Sean M Maddox; Jeffrey L Gustafson Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 15.419