Literature DB >> 2963515

Manual materials handling and the biomechanical basis for prevention of low-back pain in industry--an overview.

D B Chaffin1.   

Abstract

Two different but dependent strategies must be developed to prevent low-back pain in industry. One is of an administrative nature and is concerned with whether the worker who performs activities that stress back tissues is appropriately evaluated and trained for such work. The second strategy is of an engineering type, dealing with methods to assure that the workplace and work tasks are specified in ways that minimize injurious stresses to the low back. Both of these strategies rely on knowledge of the biomechanical requirements of a job. These must be carefully evaluated by informed observers using prescribed measurement and analysis procedures. The fundamental biomechanics of heavy lifting and observational procedures developed by an expert panel for NIOSH are described. The procedure rates the difficulty of a lifting task and then recommends whether administrative or engineering controls are warranted to reduce low-back stresses. Some suggestions for preventing excessive low-back stress by redesigning the workplace are presented also.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2963515     DOI: 10.1080/15298668791385967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J        ISSN: 0002-8894


  8 in total

1.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and back injury in ambulance officers.

Authors:  Alice Y M Jones; Raymond Y W Lee
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Low-back biomechanics and static stability during isometric pushing.

Authors:  Kevin R Granata; Bradford C Bennett
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Analysis of Difference in Center-of-Pressure Positions Between Experts and Novices During Asymmetric Lifting.

Authors:  Hieyong Jeong; Kenji Yamada; Michiko Kido; Shima Okada; Taishin Nomura; Yuko Ohno
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.316

4.  The Effects of Ramp Gradients and Pushing-Pulling Techniques on Lumbar Spinal Load in Healthy Workers.

Authors:  Chalearmpong Pinupong; Wattana Jalayondeja; Keerin Mekhora; Petcharatana Bhuanantanondh; Chutima Jalayondeja
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2020-05-20

5.  Psychophysical basis for maximum pushing and pulling forces: A review and recommendations.

Authors:  Arun Garg; Thomas Waters; Jay Kapellusch; Waldemar Karwowski
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.656

6.  The Effects of Direction of Exertion, Path, and Load Placement in Nursing Cart Pushing and Pulling Tasks: An Electromyographical Study.

Authors:  Huei Chu Kao; Chiuhsiang Joe Lin; Yung Hui Lee; Su Huang Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of Lifting Method, Safety Shoe Type, and Lifting Frequency on Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift, Physiological Responses, and Safety Shoes Discomfort Rating.

Authors:  Fares F Alferdaws; Mohamed Z Ramadan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Upper Extremity Muscular Strength in Push-Pull Tasks: Model Approach Towards Task Design.

Authors:  Joydeep Majumder; Sanjay M Kotadiya; Lokesh Kumar Sharma; Sunil Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018 Sep-Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.