Literature DB >> 27730012

Analysis of Difference in Center-of-Pressure Positions Between Experts and Novices During Asymmetric Lifting.

Hieyong Jeong1, Kenji Yamada1, Michiko Kido2, Shima Okada3, Taishin Nomura4, Yuko Ohno5.   

Abstract

Although numerous studies have analyzed the relationship between manual material handling (MMH) and the forces acting on the lumbar spine, the difference in the MMH between experts and novices through the analysis of measured data has not been well studied. The purpose of this paper was to analyze the difference in the MMH positions between ten skilled experts working at a freight transport company (Group 1) and five unskilled novices without any experience (Group 2) during asymmetric lifting. All the human subjects performed asymmetric lifting experiments with closed eyes; the experiments involved moving loads (6 and 18 kg) to the left side. Time series data of the vertical ground reaction force were measured, using a Wii Balance Board, and then, the center-of-pressure (CoP) trajectories were calculated. The balance board was used for the measurement, because it was reliable, inexpensive, and portable and provided good repeatability even on rough surfaces, and all the information pertaining to the load and worker under various conditions was captured without any omissions. Under the 18 kg load condition, the CoP positions for Group 2 were located on the same side during left asymmetric lifting; however, those for Group 1 were located on the opposite side during left asymmetric lifting ([Formula: see text]). Furthermore, under the 6 kg load condition, the load weight influenced asymmetric lifting for most subjects of Group 2 such that the CoP positions were located on the opposite side ([Formula: see text]). Based on the simulation and electromyography measurement results, we inferred that the difference in the CoP positions between the two different groups could be attributed to the difference in the hip positions. Most skilled experts position their hips in such a way that their CoP trajectories move toward the opposite side during left asymmetric lifting. Although the skillful characteristics of experts may be responsible for the lightening of the burden on the waist during asymmetric lifting, there are still two points that this paper does not clarify: the relationship between the experts' adjustment of the hip position and the load of the weight, and the influence of an imbalance of the CoP position on the forces acting on the lumbar spine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asymmetric lifting; center of pressure; foot pressure distribution; hip position; vertical ground reaction force

Year:  2016        PMID: 27730012      PMCID: PMC5052028          DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2016.2599185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med        ISSN: 2168-2372            Impact factor:   3.316


  37 in total

1.  The role of complex, simultaneous trunk motions in the risk of occupation-related low back disorders.

Authors:  F A Fathallah; W S Marras; M Parnianpour
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance.

Authors:  Ross A Clark; Adam L Bryant; Yonghao Pua; Paul McCrory; Kim Bennell; Michael Hunt
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  A simple polynomial that predicts low-back compression during complex 3-D tasks.

Authors:  S M McGill; R W Norman; J Cholewicki
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Manual materials handling and the biomechanical basis for prevention of low-back pain in industry--an overview.

Authors:  D B Chaffin
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1987-12

5.  Correlates of low back pain in a general population sample: a multidisciplinary perspective.

Authors:  A Roncarati; W McMullen
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Accelerometry--a technique for the measurement of human body movements.

Authors:  J R Morris
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders.

Authors:  W S Marras; S A Lavender; S E Leurgans; F A Fathallah; S A Ferguson; W G Allread; S L Rajulu
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  The mechanical relationship between the rearfoot, pelvis and low-back.

Authors:  Karine Duval; Tania Lam; Dave Sanderson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Motion of the center of gravity of the body in clinical evaluation of gait.

Authors:  L Tesio; P Civaschi; L Tessari
Journal:  Am J Phys Med       Date:  1985-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Medial-lateral hip positions predicted kinetic asymmetries during double-leg squats in collegiate athletes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yu Song; Ling Li; Elizabeth E Albrandt; Megan A Jensen; Boyi Dai
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  An Online Method to Detect and Locate an External Load on the Human Body with Applications in Ergonomics Assessment.

Authors:  Marta Lorenzini; Wansoo Kim; Elena De Momi; Arash Ajoudani
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Postural control and balance in a cohort of healthy people living in Europe: An observational study.

Authors:  Antonino Patti; Antonino Bianco; Neşe Şahin; Damir Sekulic; Antonio Paoli; Angelo Iovane; Giuseppe Messina; Pierre Marie Gagey; Antonio Palma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.