Literature DB >> 29634973

Subgroups of adolescents differing in physical and social environmental preferences towards cycling for transport: A latent class analysis.

Hannah Verhoeven1, Ariane Ghekiere2, Jelle Van Cauwenberg3, Delfien Van Dyck4, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij5, Peter Clarys6, Benedicte Deforche7.   

Abstract

In order to be able to tailor environmental interventions to adolescents at risk for low levels of physical activity, the aim of the present study is to identify subgroups of adolescents with different physical and social environmental preferences towards cycling for transport and to determine differences in individual characteristics between these subgroups. In this experimental study, 882 adolescents (12-16 years) completed 15 choice tasks with manipulated photographs. Participants chose between two possible routes to cycle to a friend's house which differed in seven physical micro-environmental factors, cycling distance and co-participation in cycling (i.e. cycling alone or with a friend). Latent class analysis was performed. Data were collected from March till October 2016 across Flanders (Belgium). Three subgroups could be identified. Subgroup 1 attached most importance to separation of the cycle path and safety-related aspects. Subgroup 2 attached most importance to being able to cycle together with a friend and had the highest percentage of regular cyclists. In subgroup 3, the importance of cycling distance clearly stood out. This subgroup included the lowest percentage of regular cyclists. Results showed that in order to stimulate the least regular cyclists, and thus also the subgroup most at risk for low levels of active transport, cycling distances should be as short as possible. In general, results showed that providing well-separated cycle paths which enable adolescents to cycle side by side and introducing shortcuts for cyclists may encourage different subgroups of adolescents to cycle for transport without discouraging other subgroups.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active transport; Bicycling; Experiment; Physical environment; Social environment; Subgroup; Youth

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29634973     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  5 in total

1.  Differences in physical environmental characteristics between adolescents' actual and shortest cycling routes: a study using a Google Street View-based audit.

Authors:  Hannah Verhoeven; Linde Van Hecke; Delfien Van Dyck; Tim Baert; Nico Van de Weghe; Peter Clarys; Benedicte Deforche; Jelle Van Cauwenberg
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.918

2.  An acceptance divergence? Media, citizens and policy perspectives on autonomous cars in the European Union.

Authors:  Fabio Luis Marques Dos Santos; Amandine Duboz; Monica Grosso; María Alonso Raposo; Jette Krause; Andromachi Mourtzouchou; Alexandra Balahur; Biagio Ciuffo
Journal:  Transp Res Part A Policy Pract       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Built Environment, Psychosocial Factors and Active Commuting to School in Adolescents: Clustering a Self-Organizing Map Analysis.

Authors:  Javier Molina-García; Xavier García-Massó; Isaac Estevan; Ana Queralt
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-12-29       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  A Conceptual Framework for Modelling Safe Walking and Cycling Routes to High Schools.

Authors:  Mohammad Lutfur Rahman; Antoni Moore; Melody Smith; John Lieswyn; Sandra Mandic
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Access to bike lanes and childhood obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiongfeng Pan; Li Zhao; Jiayou Luo; Yinhao Li; Lin Zhang; Tong Wu; Melody Smith; Shaoqing Dai; Peng Jia
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 9.213

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.