Literature DB >> 29633939

Renal artery anatomy assessed by quantitative analysis of selective renal angiography in 1,000 patients with hypertension.

Lucas Lauder1, Sebastian Ewen, Abraham Rami Tzafriri, Elazer Reuven Edelman, Thomas Felix Lüscher, Peter J Blankenstijn, Oliver Dörr, Markus Schlaich, Faisal Sharif, Michiel Voskuil, Thomas Zeller, Christian Ukena, Bruno Scheller, Michael Böhm, Felix Mahfoud.   

Abstract

AIMS: With increasing attention to renovascular causes and targets for hypertension there arises a critical need for more detailed knowledge of renal arterial anatomy. However, a standardised nomenclature is lacking. The present study sought to develop a standardised nomenclature for renal anatomy considering the complexity and variation of the renal arterial tree and to assess the applicability of the nomenclature. METHODS AND
RESULTS: One thousand hypertensive patients underwent invasive selective renal artery angiography in nine centres. Further, renovasography was performed in 249 healthy swine as a surrogate for normotensive anatomy. Anatomical parameters were assessed by quantitative vascular analysis. Patients' mean blood pressure was 168/90±26/17 mmHg. The right main renal artery was longer than the left (41±15 mm vs. 35±13 mm, p<0.001), but the left had a greater diameter (5.4±1.2 vs. 5.2±1.2 mm, p<0.001). Accessory renal arteries and renal artery disease were documented in 22% and 9% of the patients, respectively. Other than exhibiting a longer left main renal artery in uncontrolled hypertensives (+2.7 mm, p=0.034) there was no anatomical difference between patients with controlled and uncontrolled hypertension. Main renal artery mean diameter was smaller in patients with impaired kidney function (GFR <90 ml/min, left -0.5 mm, right -0.4 mm, both p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Renal arterial anatomy differs between sides but shows no difference between patients with and without blood pressure control. Impaired GFR was associated with small main renal artery diameter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29633939      PMCID: PMC6541921          DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  35 in total

Review 1.  Renal-artery stenosis.

Authors:  R D Safian; S C Textor
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-02-08       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Additional renal arteries: incidence and morphometry.

Authors:  K S Satyapal; A A Haffejee; B Singh; L Ramsaroop; J V Robbs; J M Kalideen
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  Epidemiology and natural history of atherosclerotic renovascular disease.

Authors:  Constantina Chrysochou; Philip A Kalra
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.194

4.  Assessment of 100 live potential renal donors for laparoscopic nephrectomy with multi-detector row helical CT.

Authors:  Andrew Holden; Andrew Smith; Paul Dukes; Helen Pilmore; Motohiko Yasutomi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Prospective comparison of 3-dimensional volume rendered computerized tomography and conventional renal arteriography for surgical planning in patients undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Hazem Abou El Fettouh; Brian R Herts; Toni Nimeh; Susan L Wirth; Audrey Caplin; Mark Sands; Anup P Ramani; Jihad Kaouk; David A Goldfarb; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Translational medicine: the antihypertensive effect of renal denervation.

Authors:  Gerald F DiBona; Murray Esler
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Accessory renal arteries are not related to hypertension risk: a review of MR angiography data.

Authors:  Avneesh Gupta; Richard Tello
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  MDCT angiography of the renal arteries in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: implications for renal artery stenting with distal protection.

Authors:  Adam D Talenfeld; Ryan B Schwope; Huntley J Alper; Emil I Cohen; Robert A Lookstein
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Renal artery stenosis predicts adverse cardiovascular and renal outcome in patients with peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  J Amighi; O Schlager; M Haumer; P Dick; W Mlekusch; C Loewe; G Böhmig; R Koppensteiner; E Minar; M Schillinger
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 4.686

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Renal Denervation: Is It Ready for Prime Time?

Authors:  Lucas Lauder; Milan A Wolf; Sean S Scholz; Mathias Hohl; Felix Mahfoud; Michael Böhm
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Relationship between Accessory Renal Artery and Clinical Characteristics of Middle-Aged Patients with Primary Hypertension.

Authors:  Kai Kang; Yeshuo Ma; Chongfu Jia; Yunpeng Cheng; Yingchao Yang; Lixin Wang; Yinong Jiang; Yan Lu
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.420

3.  Quantitative analysis of renal arterial variations affecting the eligibility of catheter-based renal denervation using multi-detector computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Won Hoon Song; Jinhwan Baik; Eue-Keun Choi; Hae-Young Lee; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Sung-Min Park; Chang Wook Jeong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A drug-induced hypotensive challenge to verify catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation in an obese hypertensive swine model.

Authors:  Lucas Lauder; L Boyce Moon; Catherine A Pipenhagen; Sebastian Ewen; Jeffrey M Fish; Renu Virmani; James A Jensen; Michael Böhm; Felix Mahfoud
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 6.138

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.