AIMS: With increasing attention to renovascular causes and targets for hypertension there arises a critical need for more detailed knowledge of renal arterial anatomy. However, a standardised nomenclature is lacking. The present study sought to develop a standardised nomenclature for renal anatomy considering the complexity and variation of the renal arterial tree and to assess the applicability of the nomenclature. METHODS AND RESULTS: One thousand hypertensive patients underwent invasive selective renal artery angiography in nine centres. Further, renovasography was performed in 249 healthy swine as a surrogate for normotensive anatomy. Anatomical parameters were assessed by quantitative vascular analysis. Patients' mean blood pressure was 168/90±26/17 mmHg. The right main renal artery was longer than the left (41±15 mm vs. 35±13 mm, p<0.001), but the left had a greater diameter (5.4±1.2 vs. 5.2±1.2 mm, p<0.001). Accessory renal arteries and renal artery disease were documented in 22% and 9% of the patients, respectively. Other than exhibiting a longer left main renal artery in uncontrolled hypertensives (+2.7 mm, p=0.034) there was no anatomical difference between patients with controlled and uncontrolled hypertension. Main renal artery mean diameter was smaller in patients with impaired kidney function (GFR <90 ml/min, left -0.5 mm, right -0.4 mm, both p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Renal arterial anatomy differs between sides but shows no difference between patients with and without blood pressure control. Impaired GFR was associated with small main renal artery diameter.
AIMS: With increasing attention to renovascular causes and targets for hypertension there arises a critical need for more detailed knowledge of renal arterial anatomy. However, a standardised nomenclature is lacking. The present study sought to develop a standardised nomenclature for renal anatomy considering the complexity and variation of the renal arterial tree and to assess the applicability of the nomenclature. METHODS AND RESULTS: One thousand hypertensivepatients underwent invasive selective renal artery angiography in nine centres. Further, renovasography was performed in 249 healthy swine as a surrogate for normotensive anatomy. Anatomical parameters were assessed by quantitative vascular analysis. Patients' mean blood pressure was 168/90±26/17 mmHg. The right main renal artery was longer than the left (41±15 mm vs. 35±13 mm, p<0.001), but the left had a greater diameter (5.4±1.2 vs. 5.2±1.2 mm, p<0.001). Accessory renal arteries and renal artery disease were documented in 22% and 9% of the patients, respectively. Other than exhibiting a longer left main renal artery in uncontrolled hypertensives (+2.7 mm, p=0.034) there was no anatomical difference between patients with controlled and uncontrolled hypertension. Main renal artery mean diameter was smaller in patients with impaired kidney function (GFR <90 ml/min, left -0.5 mm, right -0.4 mm, both p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Renal arterial anatomy differs between sides but shows no difference between patients with and without blood pressure control. Impaired GFR was associated with small main renal artery diameter.
Authors: Hazem Abou El Fettouh; Brian R Herts; Toni Nimeh; Susan L Wirth; Audrey Caplin; Mark Sands; Anup P Ramani; Jihad Kaouk; David A Goldfarb; Inderbir S Gill Journal: J Urol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: Hypertension Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Adam D Talenfeld; Ryan B Schwope; Huntley J Alper; Emil I Cohen; Robert A Lookstein Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: J Amighi; O Schlager; M Haumer; P Dick; W Mlekusch; C Loewe; G Böhmig; R Koppensteiner; E Minar; M Schillinger Journal: Eur J Clin Invest Date: 2009-06-12 Impact factor: 4.686
Authors: Lucas Lauder; Milan A Wolf; Sean S Scholz; Mathias Hohl; Felix Mahfoud; Michael Böhm Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Lucas Lauder; L Boyce Moon; Catherine A Pipenhagen; Sebastian Ewen; Jeffrey M Fish; Renu Virmani; James A Jensen; Michael Böhm; Felix Mahfoud Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 6.138